L’implication des patients et du public (IPP) dans la recherche interventionnelle est incontournable mais présente des défis à relever. L’IPP requiert une réflexion éthique et collégiale en amont de la conception de l’étude, des moyens et une gouvernance adaptée afin de tenir compte des enjeux collectifs et individuels qui sous-tendent ce nouveau partenariat.
BirdMOuelletteCWhitmoreCLiLNairKMcGillionMH, et al. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research. Health Expectations. 2020; 23: 523–539.
SkovlundPCNielsenBKThaysenHVSchmidtHFinsetAHansenKA, et al. The impact of patient involvement in research: a case study of the planning, conduct and dissemination of a clinical, controlled trial. Res Involv Engagem [Internet]. 19juill2020 [cité 4 août 2020]; 6. Disponible sur : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370448/
5.
HoweAMathieEMundayDCoweMGoodmanCKeenanJ, et al. Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Res Involv Engagem. 2017; 3: 1.
6.
CrockerJCRicci-CabelloIParkerAHirstJAChantAPetit-ZemanS, et al. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. The BMJ [Internet]. 28nov2018; 363. Disponible sur: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259046/
7.
MannCChilcottSPlumbKBrooksEManM-S. Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study. Res Involv Engage. 2018; 4: 15.
8.
BrettJStaniszewskaSMockfordCHerron-MarxSHughesJTysallC, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect Int J Public Particip Health Care Health Policy. 2014; 17: 637–650.
9.
DomecqJPPrutskyGElraiyahTWangZNabhanMShippeeN, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2014; 14: 89.
10.
ConcannonTWFusterMSaundersTPatelKWongJBLeslieLK, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29: 1692–1701.
11.
ForsytheLPCarmanKLSzydlowskiVFayishLDavidsonLHickamDH, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Health Affairs. 2019; 38: 359–367.
12.
AndermannA. Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. CMAJ. 2016; 188: E474–E483.
13.
WalmsleyJ. Involving users with learning difficulties in health improvement: lessons from inclusive learning disability research. 2004, 11: 54–64.
14.
ManafoEPetermannLMason-LaiPVandall-WalkerV. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Pol Syst. 2018; 16: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4
15.
NewmanSDAndrewsJOMagwoodGSJenkinsCCoxMJWilliamsonDC. Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a synthesis of best processes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A70.
16.
HahnDLHoffmannAEFelzienMLeMasterJWXuJFagnanLJ. Tokenism in patient engagement. Fam Pract. 2017; 34: 290–295.
17.
« A New Social Reformer: The Patient », Préface in Behavioral aspects of Aids and other sexually transmitted diseases, éd. OstrowD. G., New York, Plenum, 1990.
18.
StraussA. La trame de la négociation, Sociologie qualitative et interactionniste. Paris, 1992, L'Harmattan.
