Interventions to increase participation in cancer screening programs have been developed and evaluated by our research team. The results observed provide an opportunity to consider which methods of communication should be encouraged to improve those interventions. The objective of this commentary is to recommend communication strategies which should be adopted to efficiently reach and support disadvantaged individuals to engage in cancer screening, as a healthy behaviour.
OuédraogoSDabakuyo-YonliTSRoussotADiallaPOPornetCPoillotM-L, et al. [Breast cancer screening in thirteen French departments]. Bull Cancer (Paris). 2015; 102: 126–138.
2.
AllaryCBourmaudATinquautFOriolMKalecinskiJDutertreV, et al. ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas—study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2016; 16: 416.
3.
BourmaudASoler-MichelPOriolMRegnierVTinquautFNourissatA, et al. Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 12885–12892.
Levi-StraussC. The Savage Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1966.
6.
StaceyDLégaréFLewisKBarryMJBennettCLEdenKB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4: CD001431.
7.
DoughertyMKBrennerATCrockettSDGuptaSWheelerSBCoker-SchwimmerM, et al. Evaluation of interventions intended to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 1645–1658.
8.
MorrowJBDalloFJJulkaM. Community-based colorectal cancer screening trials with multi-ethnic groups: a systematic review. J Community Health. 2010; 35: 592–601.
9.
SpadeaTBelliniSKunstAStirbuICostaG. The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review. Prev Med. 2010; 50: 159–164.
10.
SunnyARustveldL. The role of patient navigation on colorectal cancer screening completion and education: a review of the literature. J Cancer Educ. 2018; 33: 251–259.
11.
KotlerPZaltmanG. Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. J Mark. 1971; 35: 3–12.
MoranMBWalkerMWAlexanderTNJordanJWWagnerDE. Why peer crowds matter: incorporating youth subcultures and values in health education campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: 389–395.
14.
ScholzCJovanovaMBaekECFalkEB. Media content sharing as a value-based decision. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020; 31: 83–88.
15.
PaekH-JHoveTJeonJ. Social media for message testing: a multilevel approach to linking favorable viewer responses with message, producer, and viewer influence on YouTube. Health Commun. 2013; 28: 226–236.
16.
HinyardLJKreuterMW. Using narrative commu-nication as a tool for health behavior change: a conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Educ Behav. 2007; 34: 777–792.
17.
BraunLAZomorodbakhschBKeinkiCHuebnerJ. Information needs, communication and usage of social media by cancer patients and their relatives. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019; 145: 1865–1875.
18.
ComelloMLGFarmanL. Identity as a moderator and mediator of communication effects: evidence and implications for message design. J Psychol. 2016; 150: 822–836.
19.
WakefieldMALokenBHornikRC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet Lond Engl. 2010; 376: 1261–1271.
20.
HanCJLeeYJDemirisG. Interventions using social media for cancer prevention and management: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2018; 41: E19–E31.
21.
CroagerEJGrayVPrattISSlevinTPettigrewSHolmanCD, et al. Find cancer early: evaluation of a community education campaign to increase awareness of cancer signs and symptoms in people in regional Western Australians. Front Public Health. 2018; 6: 22.
22.
ChenY-RRSchulzPJ. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18: e18.
