Cet article interroge les effets des modalités partenariales de recherche du projet GREENH-City associant des chercheur.e.s au Réseau français des Villes-Santé OMS (RfVS). Il propose une analyse de l’appropriation des connaissances scientifiques liées au projet par les villes membres du RfVS à partir du modèle de partage de connaissances. L’article montre qu’un décalage temporel peut s’opérer entre la production et l’utilisation des données liées au projet et interroge les modalités de partage de connaissances comme les pratiques de cette recherche interventionnelle.
Bureau Régional de L’Europe. Rapport sur la santé en Europe 2018. Au-delà des chiffres, des bases factuelles pour tous. Faits marquants. 2018; 24.
2.
LeclercAFassinDGranjeanMKaminskiMLangT. Les inégalités sociales de santé. Paris: La Découverte; 2000.
3.
BoazAGoughD. Towards a systems perspective on evidence-based policy. Evid Policy. 2014; 10: 311–312.
4.
AllaFCambonL. Transformation of health systems: contribution of population health intervention research. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2: e539.
5.
PorcherieMLe Bihan-YouinouBPommierJ. Les évolutions des modes d’action pour agir sur les inégalités sociales de santé dans les recommandations politiques à l’international et en France. Santé Publique (Paris). 2018; 1: 33–46.
6.
HawePPotvinL. What is population health intervention research?Can J Public Health. 2009; 100: Suppl I8–Suppl I14.
7.
MooreGFAudreySBarkerMBondLBonellCHardemanW, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350: h1258.
8.
CraigPCooperCGunnellDHawSLawsonKMacintyreS, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66: 1182–1186.
9.
JagoshJBushPLSalsbergJMacaulayACGreenhalghTWongG, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 725.
10.
ViotMVaillantZHarelLRicanSDauchezMBBaronM, et al. Knowledge co-production and local transfer to reduce inequalities of access to breast cancer screening|Transfert de connaissances pour réduire les inégalités infra-communales d’accès au dépistage du cancer du sein. Santé Publique (Paris). 2015; 27: 321–330.
11.
PorcherieMVaillantZFaureERicanSSimosJCantoreggiNL, et al. The GREENH-City interventional research protocol on health in all policies. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 820.
12.
CambonLTerralPAllaF. From intervention to interventional system: towards greater theorization in population health intervention research. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1–7.
13.
LemireSTSouffezKLaurendeauM. Animer un processus de transfert de connaissances: bilan des connaissances et outil d’animation. Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec; 2009.
14.
World Health Organization. Urban Green Spaces: A Brief for Action. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2017, p.24.
15.
WeissESAndersonRMLaskerRD. Making the most of collaboration: exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning. Health Educ Behav. 2002; 29: 683–698.
16.
DrahotaAMezaRDBrikhoBNaafMEstabilloJAGomezED, et al. Community-academic partnerships: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Q. 2016; 94: 163–214.
17.
LauASRodriguezABandoLInnes-GombergDBrookman-FrazeeL. Research community collaboration in observational implementation research: complementary motivations and concerns in engaging in the study of implementation as usual. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020; 47: 210–226.
18.
CorbinJJonesJBarryMM. What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature. Health Promot Int. 2018; 33: 4–26.
19.
RogersEM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 2002; 27: 989–993.
20.
HoekstraFMrklasKJSibleyKMNguyenTVis-DunbarMNeilsonCJ, et al. A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach. Syst Rev. 2018; 7: 217.
21.
Roué Le GallALemaireNJabotF. Lessons learned from co-constructing a guide on healthy urban planning and on integrating health issues into Environmental Impact Assessments conducted on French urban development projects. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 2018; 36: 68–80.
22.
FaureEHernandez-GonzalezELuxembourgC. La ville: quel genre ? L’espace public à l’épreuve du genre. Montreuil: Le temps des Cerises; 2017, p.310.
23.
HoekstraFMrklasKJKhanMMcKayRCVis-DunbarMSibleyKM, et al. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020; 18: 1–23.
24.
MoullinJCDicksonKSStadnickNAAlbersBNilsenPBroder-FingertS, et al. Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implement Sci Commun. 2020; 1: 42.
25.
KingdonJ. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013, p.240.
26.
Rycroft-MaloneJWilkinsonJBurtonCRHarveyGMcCormackBGrahamI, et al. Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013; 18(3 Suppl): 13–26.
