Health-promoting educational settings in Taiwan: development and evaluation of the Health-Promoting School Accreditation System

Abstract

Introduction:

The Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare and Ministry of Education launched the Health-Promoting School (HPS) program in 2002. One of the most significant barriers to evaluating HPS is the absence of adequate instruments. The main aim of this study is to develop the Taiwan Health-Promoting School Accreditation System (HPSAS) framework and then evaluate its accreditation effectiveness.

Methods:

The HPSAS accreditation standards were derived mainly from the World Health Organization (WHO) publication, WHO Health Promoting Schools: A Framework for Action in 2008 and the Taiwan School Health Act. Delphi technique and pilot test were used to confirm the availability and acceptability of the standards and procedures for HPSAS in 2011. After that, two rounds of school evaluations were completed in 2012 (214 participant schools) and 2014 (182 participant schools). The accreditation operation process included documentary reviews, national and international accredited commissioners conducted on-site visits. Descriptive analyses were used to indicate HPS award level distribution.

Results:

The study established six key HPSAS standards. Each standard had at least two components; overall, there were 21 components and 47 scoring elements. Of the participating schools evaluated in 2012, four were at the gold, 14 silver, and 120 bronze levels, compared with five, 20, and 31, respectively, of schools evaluated in 2014. The study showed that schools at different award levels had different full-score rates in six standards. The schools at the gold level performed exceptionally well. The worst performance among the six standards at each award level was in the skill-based health curriculum.

Conclusion:

The HPSAS is an objective instrument used to evaluate the process and outcomes of the HPS program. In the future, combinations of different types of data (e.g. students’ health behaviors, school climate, or teachers’ health-teaching innovations) will enable further validation of the HPS effectiveness.

Keywords

health promoting schools health promotion Taiwan evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, 1986. [Online]. 1986. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/policy-documents/ottawa-charter-for-health-promotion,-1986 (accessed March 16, 2015).

World Health Organization. School Health promotion-Series 5: Regional Guidelines: Development of health promoting schools: A Framework of action. Manila, Philippines: WHO; 1996.

Lee

Keung

VMW

ASC

Kwong

Armstrong

. Developing a framework for evaluating efficacy in Health Promoting Schools in Hong Kong. Health Educ. 2014; 114: 225–242.

Lee

Cheng

FFK

Fung

St Leger

. Can Health Promoting Schools contribute to the better health and wellbeing of young people? The Hong Kong experience. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60: 530–536.

Lee

Cheng

Yuen

Leung

. Achieving good standard of Health Promoting Schools: Preliminary analysis after one year implementation of Hong Kong Healthy Schools Award Scheme. Public Health. 2007; 121: 752–760.

Lee

Wong

MCS

Keung

UMW

Yuen

HSK

Cheng

Mok

JSY

. Can the concept of Health Promoting Schools help to improve students’ health knowledge and practices to combat the challenge of communicable diseases: Case study in Hong Kong? BMC Public Health. 2008; 8: 42.

Lee

. Health-promoting schools: evidence for a holistic approach to promoting health and improving health literacy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009; 7: 11–17.

Phaitrakoon

Powwattana

Lagampan

Klaewkla

. The diamond level health promoting schools (DLHPS) program for reduced child obesity in Thailand: lessons learned from interviews and focus groups. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014; 23: 293–300.

Health Promotion Administration. Health Promoting Schools. In: Health Promotion Administration Annual Report. Taipei, Taiwan: Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare R.O.C. (Taiwan); 2013, pp. 65–68.

10.

Liu

Chen

Chiou

Chang

Yen

. Taiwan Health Promoting School Center Planning Report. Taipei, Taiwan: Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare R.O.C. (Taiwan); 2009.

11.

Chen

Chiou

Guo

Wang

. A Health Promoting School International Accreditation Program in Taiwan Project Report. Taipei, Taiwan: Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare R.O.C. (Taiwan); 2012.

12.

Ministry of Education. Four cities won Excellent City Award on Health Promoting School Project in Taiwan (R.O.C). 2015. Available from: http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=26220&wid=ddc91d2b-ace4–4e00–9531-fc7f63364719&Index=1 (accessed March 11, 2015).

13.

Mukoma

Flisher

. Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies. Health Promot Int. 2004; 19: 357–368.

14.

Inchley

Muldoon

Currie

. Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland. Health Promot Int. 2006; 22: 65–71.

15.

Valois

Slade

Ashford

. The Healthy School Communities Model: Aligning Health and Education in the School Setting, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 2011. Available from: http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/Aligning-Health-Education.pdf (accessed March 11, 2015).

16.

St Leger

. Australian teachers’ understandings of the health promoting school concept and the implications for the development of school health. Health Promotion Int. 1998; 139: 223–235.

17.

Gyarmathy

McNutt

Molnar

Morse

DeHovitz

Ujhelyi

. Evaluation of a comprehensive AIDS education curriculum in Hungary—the role of good educators. J Adolesc. 2002; 25: 495–508.

18.

Midford

Munro

McBride

Snow

Ladzinski

. Principles that underpin effective school-based drug education. J Drug Educ. 2002; 32: 363–386.

19.

Leurs

MTW

Bessems

Schaalma

Vries

. Focus points for school health promotion improvements in Dutch primary schools. Health Educ Res. 2007; 22: 58–69.

20.

Maes

Lievens

. Can the school make a difference? A multilevel analysis of adolescent risk and health behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56: 517–529.

21.

Ahmed

Flisher

Mathews

Jansen

Mukoma

Schaalma

. Process evaluation of the teacher training for an AIDS prevention programme. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 621–632.

22.

Visser

. Life skills training as HIV/AIDS preventive strategy in secondary schools: evaluation of a large-scale implementation process. SAHARA-J-J. SOC ASP HIV/AIDS. 2005; 2: 203–216.

23.

Botvin

Griffin

. Life skills training: empirical findings and future directions. J Prim Prev. 2004; 25: 211–232.

24.

Hahn

Noland

Rayens

Christie

. Efficacy of training and fidelity of implementation of the life skills training program. J School Health. 2002; 72: 282–287.

25.

Fahlman

Hall

Gutuskey

. The impact of a health methods class on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and intent to teach health. Am J Health Educ. 2013; 44: 316–323.

26.

Yang

. Dilemmas of education reform in Taiwan: internationalization or localization? Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society; 2001 Mar 13–17; Washington D.C., USA.

27.

Yang

. A study of the policy of promoting the twelve-year public education program. B Educ Res. 2006; 52: 1–31.

28.

Hardré

Chen

Huang

Chiang

Jen

Warden

. Factors affecting high school students’ academic motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Educ. 2006; 26: 189–207.

29.

Macneil

Prater

Busch

. The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. Int J Leadership Educ. 2009; 12: 73–84.

30.

Hoyle

Samek

Valois

. Building capacity for the continuous improvement of health-promoting schools. J School Health. 2008; 78: 1–8.