Student-school connectedness is inversely associated with multiple health risk behaviors, yet research is limited on the relative contributions of a student’s connectedness with school and an overall context of school social cohesion to peer victimization/bullying.
Purpose:
We examined associations of perceived school cohesion and student-school connectedness with physical victimization, verbal victimization, and social exclusion in the past six months in adolescents in grades 6–11 (N = 774) attending 11 public and private urban schools in Colombia.
Methods:
Cross-sectional data were collected via a self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression models.
Results:
Higher perceived school cohesion was inversely related with exposure to three bullying types examined (p < 0.05); student-school connectedness was negatively related to verbal victimization among girls only (p < 0.01). In full models, school cohesion maintained inverse associations with three bullying types after controlling for student-school connectedness (p ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion:
Enhancing school cohesion may hold benefits for bullying prevention beyond a student’s individual school connectedness.
AntonovskyA. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int.1996;11: 11–18.
2.
OlweusD. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do (Understanding Children’s Worlds). Massachusetts: Blackwell; 1993.
3.
SmithPKBrainP. Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggress Behav. 2000; 26: 1–9.
4.
HawkerDSBoultonMJ. Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000; 41: 441–455.
5.
CardNAStuckyBDSawalaniGMLittleTD. Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Dev. 2008; 79: 1185–1229.
6.
GiniGPozzoliT. Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics.2009;123: 1059–1065.
7.
SrabsteinJPiazzaT. Public health, safety and educational risks associated with bullying behaviors in American adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008; 20: 223–233.
8.
EspelageDLHoltMK. Suicidal ideation and school bullying experiences after controlling for depression and delinquency. J Adolesc Health.2013;53 (1 Suppl): S27–S31.
9.
FlemingLCJacobsenKH. Bullying among middle-school students in low and middle income countries. Health Promot Int.2009; 25: 73–84.
10.
DuePHolsteinBE. Bullying victimization among 13 to 15 year old school children: results from two comparative studies in 66 countries and regions. Int J Adolesc Med Health.2008; 20: 209–221.
11.
ChauxEMolanoAPodleskP. Socio-economic, socio-political and socio-emotional variables explaining school bullying: a country-wide multilevel analysis. Aggress Behav. 2009; 35: 520–529.
12.
Villar-MárquezE. School-based violence in Colombia: Links to state-level armed conflict, educational effects and challenges. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization/Education for All Global Monitoring Report; 2010. Available from:http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001912/191228e.pdf (accessed June 16, 2014).
13.
SrabsteinJCLeventhalBL. Prevention of bullying-related morbidity and mortality: a call for public health policies. Bull World Health Organ.2010; 88: 403.
14.
BattistichVHomA. The relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 1997–2001.
15.
Simons-MortonBBCrumpAD. The association of parental involvement and social competence with school adjustment and engagement among sixth graders. J Sch Health.2002; 73: 121–126.
16.
LowSVan RyzinMJBrownECSmithBHHaggertyKP. Engagement matters: lessons from assessing classroom implementation of steps to respect: a bullying prevention program over a one-year period. Prev Sci.2014; 15: 165–176.
17.
SpringerAParcelGBaumlerERossM.Supportive social relationships and adolescent health risk behavior among secondary school students in El Salvador. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1628–1640.
18.
ZaykowskiHGunterW. Youth victimization: school climate or deviant lifestyles?J Interpers Violence.2012; 27: 4431–4452.
19.
GoodenowC. The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: scale development and educational correlates.Psychol Sch. 1993; 30: 70–90.
20.
ResnickMDBearmanPSBlumRW. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. JAMA.1997; 278: 823–832.
21.
MoutonSGHawkinsJMcPhersonRHCopleyJ. School attachment: perspectives of low-attached high school students. Educational Psychology. 1996; 16: 297–304.
22.
HawkinsJDWeisJG. The social development model: an integrated approach to delinquency prevention. J Prim Prev. 1985; 6: 73–97.
FinnJD. Withdrawing from school. Rev Educ Res. 1989; 59: 117–142.
25.
HirschiT. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.
26.
KleinJCornellDKonoldT. Relationships between bullying, school climate, and student risk behaviors. Sch Psychol Q. 2012; 27: 154–169.
27.
ElsaesserCGorman-SmithDHenryD. The role of the school environment in relational aggression and victimization. J Youth Adolesc.2013; 42: 235–249.
28.
EliotMCornellDGregoryAFanX. Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. J Sch Psychol. 2010; 48: 533–553.
29.
HenryDBFarrellADSchoenyMETolanPHDymnickiAB. Influence of school-level variables on aggression and associated attitudes of middle school students. J Sch Psychol.2011; 49: 481–503.
30.
GoldammerLSwahnMHStrasserSMAshbyJSMeyersJ. An examination of bullying in Georgia schools: demographic and school climate factors associated with willingness to intervene in bullying situations. West J Emerg Med. 2013; 14: 324–328.
31.
Simons-MortonBGCrumpADHaynieDLSaylorKE. Student-school bonding and adolescent problem behavior. Health Educ Res.1999; 14: 99–107.
32.
Cuevas JaramilloMCHoyos HernándezPAOrtíz GómezY. Prevalencia de intimidación en dos instituciones educativas del departamento del Valle del Cauca. Pensamiento Psicológico. 2009; 6: 153–172.
BejaranoLMDíazCValenciaJCuevasMC. Prevalencia de violencia entre compañeros y efectos psicológicos para las víctimas entre segundo y once grado de un colegio privado de la ciudad de Cali. Universidad Javeriana-Cali;2008.
36.
DeVellisRF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd ed.California: Sage; 2003.
37.
SpringerAEMcQueenAQuintanillaGArrivillagaMRossM. Reliability and validity of the student perceptions of school cohesion scale in a sample of Salvadoran secondary school students.BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009; 9: 30.
38.
CatellRB. The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res.1966; 1: 245–276.
39.
KaiserHF. The application of electronic-computers to factor-analysis. Educ Psychol Meas.1960; 20: 141–151.
40.
MurrayD. Design and Analysis of Group Randomized Trials.United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1998.
41.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.2nd ed.New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
42.
AnteghiniMFonsecaHIrelandMBlumRW. Health risk behaviors and associated risk and protective factors among Brazilian adolescents in Santos, Brazil. J Adolesc Health.2001; 28: 295–302.
43.
KliewerWMurrelleL. Risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: findings from a study in selected Central American countries. J Adolesc Health.2007;40: 448–455.
44.
BlumRWIrelandM. Reducing risk, increasing protective factors: findings from the Caribbean Youth Health Survey. J Adolesc Health.2004; 35: 493–500.
45.
DemanetJVan HoutteM. School belonging and school misconduct: the differing role of teacher and peer attachment. J Youth Adolesc.2012; 41: 499–514.
46.
SchroederBAMessinaASchroederD. The implementation of a statewide bullying prevention program: preliminary findings from the field and the importance of coalitions. Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13: 489–495.
47.
WaasdorpTEBradshawCPLeafPJ. The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: a randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012; 166: 149–156.
