Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Charte d’Ottawa pour la Promotion de la Santé. 1° Conférence Internationale pour la Promotion de la Santé. Ottawa, Canada: OMS; 1996: 4.
6.
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Charte de Bangkok pour la Promotion de la Santé à l’heure de la mondialisation. 6° Conférence mondiale sur la Promotion de la Santé. Bangkok, Thailand; 2005: 1–6.
7.
HesseBWO’ConnellMAugustsonEMChouW-YSShaikhARRuttenLJF. Realizing the promise of web 2.0: engaging community intelligence. J Health Comm. 2012; 16 suppl. 1: 10–31.
8.
GuistiniD. How web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ. 2006; 333(7582): 1283–1284.
9.
De KerkhoveD. McLuhan and the “Toronto School of Communication”. Can J Comm [internet]. 1989; 14(4): 73–79.
10.
CarpenterES. They Became What They Beheld. New York, NY, USA: Outerbridge & Dienstfrey / E.P. Dutton; 1970.
BiscopeSPolandBSkinnerH. Quality of internet access: barrier behind internet use statistics. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(5): 875–880.
29.
BodieGDuttaMJ. Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: ehealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health Market Q. 2008; 25(1): 175–203.
ChinnD. Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73(1): 60–67.
32.
NormanCDSkinnerHA. Ehealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res [internet]. 2006; 8(2): e9 (cité le 12 juillet 2012).
33.
NormanCD. Ehealth literacy 2.0: problems and opportunities with an evolving concept. J Med Internet Res [internet]. 2011; 13(4): e125. http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e125/
34.
NutbeamD. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(12): 2072–2078.
35.
NormanCD. Health promotion as a systems science and practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009; 15(5): 868–872.
36.
PattonMQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press;2010.
37.
ChristensenCOverdorfM. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harv Bus Rev. 2000; 78(2): 66–77.
