“A Review of Mental Health Morbidity Associated With OFSTED Inspections of Schools in one Metropolitan Local Authority”. Journal of Occupational Medicine (1999), November, Volume 49, Issue 8.
2.
DishionT. J.McCordJ., and PoulinF. (1999). When Interventions Harm. American Psychologist54(9): 755–764.
3.
DemingWE. (1986). Out of the Crisis: Quality Productivity and Competitive Position.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Engineering Council. (2000). Measuring the Mathematics Problem.London: Engineering Council.
5.
Fitz-GibbonC. T. (1985). A-Level Results in Comprehensive Schools: The Combse Project Year 1. Oxford Review of Education11(1): 43–58.
6.
Fitz-GibbonC. T., and VincentL. (1994). Candidates’ Performance In Public Examinations in Mathematics and Science.London, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA).
7.
Fitz-GibbonC. T. (1997). The Value Added National Project: Final Report: Feasibility studies for national system of Value Added indicators.London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
8.
Fitz-GibbonC. T. (1998). Ofsted: time to go?Managing Schools Today7(6): 22–25.
9.
Fitz-GibbonC. T., and Stephenson-ForsterN. J. (1999). Is Ofsted helpful? An evaluation using social science criteria. An Inspector Calls: Ofsted and its effect on school standards.C. Cullingford.London, Kogan Page: 97–118.
10.
McCordJ. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist33: 284–289.
11.
RaabG. (2002). Evaluating teacher delivered sex-education counter-intuitive results. Paper presented at the Royal Statistical Society International meeting, Plymouth.
12.
ShewhartW. A. (1986). Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control (Graduate School, Department of Agriculture, Washington, 1939); Dover 1987.
TymmsP., and Fitz-GibbonC.T. (2001) Standards, Achievement and Educational Performance: A Cause for Celebration? In PhillipsRobert, and FurlongJohn (Eds) Education, Reform and the State: Twenty-Five Years of Politics, Policy and Practice.London: Routledge Falmer.
