Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims:

Social prescribing is a growing health policy agenda to improve the quality and effectiveness of health systems. However, systematically collected knowledge on factors influencing the effective implementation of SP is scarce. A systematic review was conducted to identify and categorize factors influencing social prescribing initiatives.

Methods:

A search of three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge) was carried out to retrieve studies from inception to May 2022, supplemented by grey literature searching and snowballing of the relevant references. The inclusion criteria were original empirical research, qualitative data collection, and a description of factors affecting social prescribing initiatives. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. We categorized the results of individual studies using a narrative approach.

Results:

A total of 23 studies were included for analysis. Along with patient-related factors (patient-centeredness, clinical complexity, perception, knowledge), three main settings of social prescribing initiatives (including healthcare providers, link workers, and voluntary and community sectors) are affected by (1) individual characteristics (knowledge, perception, skill mix); (2) interpersonal relations (collaboration, trust, feedback, supportive climate, follow-up, sustained connection, peer support within and across sectors); (3) organizational contingencies (resource adequacy, staffing, training, role description, continuity of support, caseload management, monitoring, affordability, accessibility, referral criteria, and tailored support); and (4) political context (national policy and guidance, stewardship, planning, cocreation, bureaucracy, economic condition, and the number of support organizations).

Conclusion:

Many factors influencing social prescribing initiatives were identified. The results of this review can be applied by different stakeholders of social prescribing to guide development, implementation, description, and evaluation.

Keywords

social determinants of health social prescribing systematic review qualitative evidence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Havranek

Mujahid

Barr

, et al. Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;132(9):873–98.

Braveman

Gottlieb

. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014;129(suppl 2):19–31.

Donkin

Goldblatt

Allen

, et al. Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Global Health 2018;3(suppl 1):e000603.

Drinkwater

Wildman

Moffatt

. Social prescribing. BMJ 2019;364:l1285.

Zimmermann

Mews

Kloppe

, et al. Social problems in primary health care–prevalence, responses, course of action, and the need for support from a general practitioners’ point of view. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2018;131:81–9.

Schwenker

Kroeber

Deutsch

, et al. Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11(12):e051383.

Aughterson

Baxter

Fancourt

. Social prescribing for individuals with mental health problems: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers experienced by general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21(1):194.

Brown

RCH

Mahtani

Turk

, et al. Social prescribing in National Health Service primary care: what are the ethical considerations? Milbank Q 2021;99(3):610–28.

Torjesen

. Social prescribing could help alleviate pressure on GPs. BMJ 2016;352:i1436.

10.

Tierney

Wong

Roberts

, et al. Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review. BMC Med 2020;18(1):49.

11.

Davis-Hall

. The Bromley by Bow Centre: harnessing the power of community. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68(672):333.

12.

Foster

Thompson

Holding

, et al. Impact of social prescribing to address loneliness: a mixed methods evaluation of a national social prescribing programme. Health Soc Care Community 2021;29(5):1439–49.

13.

Kimberlee

. What is the value of social prescribing? Adv Soc Sci Res J 2016;3(3):29–35.

14.

Pescheny

Randhawa

Pappas

. The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Public Health 2020;30(4):664–73.

15.

Greenhalgh

Papoutsi

. Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. New York: Springer; 2018, pp. 1–6.

16.

Hawe

. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Ann Rev Public Health 2015;36:307–23.

17.

Bickerdike

Booth

Wilson

, et al. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open 2017;7(4):e013384.

18.

Thomas

Lynch

Spencer

. A systematic review to examine the evidence in developing social prescribing interventions that apply a co-productive, co-designed approach to improve well-being outcomes in a community setting. Int J Enviro Res Public Health 2021;18(8):3896.

19.

Dronina

Ndombi

Kim

, et al. Financing mechanisms of social prescribing projects: a systematic review. Health Policy Manag 2020;30(4):513–21.

20.

Page

McKenzie

Bossuyt

, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Sur 2021;88:105906.

21.

Noyes

Popay

Pearson

, et al. Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews, 2015. Available online at: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_20/20_qualitative_research_and_cochrane_reviews.htm

22.

Hannes

. Critical appraisal of qualitative research, 2011. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1794169?limo=0

23.

Batinic

Opacic

Ignjatov

, et al. Comorbidity and suicidality in patients diagnosed with panic disorder/agoraphobia and major depression. Psychiatr Danub 2017;29(2):186–94.

24.

Calderón-Larrañaga

Milner

Clinch

, et al. Tensions and opportunities in social prescribing. Developing a framework to facilitate its implementation and evaluation in primary care: a realist review. BJGP Open 2021;5(3):BJGPO.2021.0017.

25.

Pons-Vigués

Berenguera

Coma-Auli

, et al. Qualitative evaluation of a complex intervention to implement health promotion activities according to healthcare attendees and health professionals: EIRA study (phase II). BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e023872.

26.

White

Cornish

Kerr

. Front-line perspectives on ‘joined-up’ working relationships: a qualitative study of social prescribing in the west of Scotland. Health Soc Care Community 2017;25(1):194–203.

27.

Pescheny

Randhawa

Pappas

. Patient uptake and adherence to social prescribing: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2018;2(3):bjgpopen18X101598.

28.

Moffatt

Steer

Lawson

, et al. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open 2017;7(7):e015203.

29.

Holding

Thompson

Foster

, et al. Connecting communities: a qualitative investigation of the challenges in delivering a national social prescribing service to reduce loneliness. Health Soc Care Community 2020;28(5):1535–43.

30.

Wormald

Waters

Sleap

, et al. Participants’ perceptions of a lifestyle approach to promoting physical activity: targeting deprived communities in Kingston-upon-Hull. BMC Public Health 2006;6:202.

31.

Schmidt

Absalah

Nierkens

, et al. Which factors engage women in deprived neighbourhoods to participate in exercise referral schemes? BMC Public Health 2008;8:371.

32.

Southby

Gamsu

. Factors affecting general practice collaboration with voluntary and community sector organisations. Health Soc Care Community 2018;26(3):e360–9.

33.

Whitelaw

Thirlwall

Morrison

, et al. Developing and implementing a social prescribing initiative in primary care: insights into the possibility of normalisation and sustainability from a UK case study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2017;18(2):112–21.

34.

Carnes

Sohanpal

Frostick

, et al. The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Services Research 2017;17(1):835.

35.

Faulkner

. Supporting the psychosocial needs of patients in general practice: the role of a voluntary referral service. Patient Educ Couns 2004;52(1):41–6.

36.

Bertotti

Frostick

Hutt

, et al. A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018;19(3):232–45.

37.

Din

Moore

Murphy

, et al. Health professionals’ perspectives on exercise referral and physical activity promotion in primary care: findings from a process evaluation of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales. Health Educ J 2015;74(6):743–57.

38.

Graham

Dugdill

Cable

. Health professionals’ perspectives in exercise referral: implications for the referral process. Ergonomics 2005;48(11–14):1411–22.

39.

Wildman

Moffatt

Penn

, et al. Link workers’ perspectives on factors enabling and preventing client engagement with social prescribing. Health Soc Care Community 2019;27(4):991–8.

40.

Frostick

Bertotti

. The frontline of social prescribing–how do we ensure link workers can work safely and effectively within primary care? Chronic Illn 2021;17(4):404–15.

41.

Wildman

Moffatt

Steer

, et al. Service-users’ perspectives of link worker social prescribing: a qualitative follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):98.

42.

Heijnders

Meijs

. ‘Welzijn op Recept’ (social prescribing): a helping hand in re-establishing social contacts–an explorative qualitative study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018;19(3):223–31.

43.

Beardmore

. Working in social prescribing services: a qualitative study. J Health Organ Manag 2019;34:40–52.

44.

Payne

Walton

Burton

. Steps to benefit from social prescription: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract 2020;70(690):e36–44.

45.

Skivington

Smith

Chng

, et al. Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68(672):e487–94.

46.

Franken

Koolman

. Health system goals: a discrete choice experiment to obtain societal valuations. Health Policy 2013;112(1):28–34.

47.

Greene

. Tracking the six aims of the IOM report: crossing the quality chasm – healthcare in the 21st century. J Ambul Care Manag 2007;30(4):281–2.

48.

LoCurto

Berg

. Trust in healthcare settings: scale development, methods, and preliminary determinants. SAGE Open Med 2016;4:2050312116664224.

49.

Santric Milicevic

Vasic

Edwards

, et al. Strengthening the public health workforce: an estimation of the long-term requirements for public health specialists in Serbia. Health Policy 2018;122(6):674–80.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Factors influencing social prescribing initiatives: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Abstract

Aims:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material