Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for influenza and mosquito-borne illnesses

Abstract

Aims:

We conducted a statewide online survey to understand public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for mosquito-borne diseases and influenza in Arizona.

Methods:

The survey included knowledge of diseases, major health concerns, and sources of health information and KAP of NPIs for influenza and mosquito-borne diseases. Our team worked with Qualtrics^®, an online survey company, to recruit a representative sample of 1500 adults in Arizona.

Results:

Of the 1531 respondents who completed the survey, most indicated that chronic conditions were their primary health concern (48%), with the other half split between infectious diseases (25%) and health effects of environmental conditions (26%). The majority (88%) of respondents indicated that they use the Internet to get their health information. Approximately one in eight people reported not emptying standing water and reducing potential mosquito habitats, despite respondents citing them as being the most effective factors in reducing mosquitoes. Regarding specific diseases, about half of the respondents were concerned about West Nile virus and/or Zika virus. Most (85%) people knew the signs and symptoms of influenza and 63% of people reported being likely to get the influenza shot. Those who did not vaccinate (n = 285) reported concerns that the vaccine would make them sick (41%), was ineffective (37%), or others indicated, ‘I don’t want to’ (37%).

Conclusions:

Overall, respondents were most concerned with chronic conditions and received their information from the Internet. Knowledge about mosquito-borne diseases was low. There were high levels of acceptance and self-reported uptake of the influenza vaccine.

Keywords

emergency preparedness and response influenza/pandemic influenza vector-borne disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Teasdale

Santer

Geraghty

AWA

et al. Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of respiratory infection: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health 2014;14:589.

Roehrig

Layton

Smith

et al. The emergence of West Nile virus in North America: ecology, epidemiology, and surveillance. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002;267:223–40.

Rosenberg

Lindsey

Fischer

et al. Vital signs: trends in reported vectorborne disease cases – United States and territories, 2004–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67(17):496–501.

Fox

Averett

Hansen

et al. The effect of health communications on a statewide West Nile Virus public health education campaign. Am J Health Behav 2006;30:483–94.

Bodner

LaDeau

Biehler

et al. Effectiveness of print education at reducing urban mosquito infestation through improved resident-based management. PLoS ONE 2016;11(5):e0155011.

Matthias

Zielinski-Gutierrez

Tisch

et al. Evaluating public housing residents for knowledge, attitudes, and practices following dengue prevention outreach in Key West, Florida. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2014;14(11):788–93.

Dickinson

Paskewitz

Willingness to pay for mosquito control: how important is West Nile virus risk compared to the nuisance of mosquitoes?

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2012;12(10):886–92.

Haenchen

Hayden

Dickinson

et al. Mosquito avoidance practices and knowledge of arboviral diseases in cities with differing recent history of disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016;95(4):945–53.

Aledort

Lurie

Wasserman

et al. Non-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base. BMC Public Health 2007;7:208.

10.

Smith

SMS

Sonego

Wallen

et al. Use of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the transmission of influenza in adults: a systematic review. Respirology 2015;20(6):896–903.

11.

Bults

Beaujean

DJMA

Richardus

et al. Perceptions and behavioral responses of the general public during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2015;9(2):207–19.

12.

Chowell

Ayala

Berisha

et al. Risk factors for mortality among 2009 A/H1N1 Influenza Hospitalizations in Maricopa County, Arizona, April 2009 to March 2010. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:914196.

13.

Jones

Lopez

Adams

et al. Binational Dengue outbreak along the United States–Mexico border – Yuma County, Arizona, and Sonora, Mexico, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65(19):495–9.

14.

Qualtrics . Provo, UT: Qualtrics; 2013. Available online at: www.qualtrics.com

15.

Sharma

Yadav

et al. Zika virus pandemic – analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am J Infect Control 2017;45(3):301–2.

16.

Rice

Galang

Roth

et al. Vital signs: Zika-associated birth defects and neurodevelopmental abnormalities possibly associated with congenital Zika virus infection – U.S. territories and freely associated states, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:858–67.

17.

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Final cumulative maps and data (West Nile virus). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/westnile/statsmaps/cumMapsData.html#seven (last accessed 3 October 2018)

18.

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza vaccination coverage (seasonal influenza (flu)). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/index.htm (last accessed 3 October 2018)

19.

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC vaccine price list. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/awardees/vaccine-management/price-list/index.html (2019, last accessed 25 September 2019)

20.

Chao

Halloran

Longini

Jr.

School opening dates predict pandemic influenza A(H1N1) epidemics in the USA. J Infect Dis 2010;202(6):877–80.

Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for influenza and mosquito-borne illnesses – a statewide survey in Arizona