Perspectives on cervical cancer screening and prevention: challenges faced by providers and patients along the Texas

Abstract

Background:

The Rio Grande Valley (RGV) and Laredo regions located along the Texas–Mexico border consist of seven counties with a population of approximately 1.5 million people and a high uninsured rate (33.5%). Cervical cancer mortality in these border counties is approximately 30% higher than the rest of Texas. The RGV and Laredo areas were studied to better understand the state of access to cervical cancer prevention services along the Texas–Mexico border.

Methods:

Data on the population served and the services provided were analyzed to determine the gap between cervical cancer screenings recommended versus those received. Through interviews, we gathered the perspectives of 16 local stakeholders regarding cervical cancer screening for underserved individuals in the region.

Findings:

It is estimated that 69,139 uninsured women aged 21–64 years in the RGV/Laredo per year are recommended to undergo cervical cancer screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, but only 8941 (12.9%) Pap tests are being performed by the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) serving uninsured women in these regions. Systemic barriers identified include insufficient provider clinical capacity, the high cost of healthcare, and uncertainty about government funding sources. Patient barriers identified include inadequate knowledge on navigating the local healthcare system, low health literacy, lack of money and childcare, an inability to miss work, limited transportation, and fear of deportation.

Conclusion:

Decreasing the disparity between cervical cancer screening services provided and those recommended requires addressing the barriers, identified by local experts, which prevent uninsured women from accessing care. These challenges are being addressed through ongoing programs and collaborations.

Keywords

cervical cancer screening barriers human papillomavirus (HPV)project ECHO Texas–Mexico border

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Eng J Med 2007;356:1915–27.

Paavonen

Naud

Salmeron

et al . Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 2009;374:301–14.

Saslow

Solomon

Lawson

et al . American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(3):147–72.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Cervical cancer: screening. Rockville, MD: US Preventive Services Task Force; 2012.

Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin number 131: screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1222–38.

Siegel

Zou

et al . Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9–29.

Schiffman

Wentzensen

Wacholder

et al . Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:368–383.

Papanicolaou

. A new procedure for staining vaginal smears. Science 1942;95:438–439.

United States–México Border Health Commission. Healthy border 2020: a prevention & health promotion initiative. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/res_2805.pdf

10.

Texas Department of State Health Services. Texas cancer registry. Available at: https://www.dshs.texas.gov/tcr/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

11.

US Department of Commerce. United States Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

12.

National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: cervix uteri cancer. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html (last accessed 23 June 2018).

13.

The University of Texas. MD Anderson Cancer Center. Available at: https://www.mdanderson.org (last accessed 23 June 2018).

14.

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). UTHealth School of Public Health in Brownsville. Available at: https://sph.uth.edu/campuses/brownsville/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

15.

Su Clínica. Available at: https://www.suclinica.org/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

16.

The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. Regional Maternal Child Health Program. Available at: https://www.utmbhealth.com/services/rmchp/home (last accessed 23 June 2018).

17.

Becker

. Mobile medicine on the border. Texas Medical Center News, 6th December 2016. Available at: http://www.tmc.edu/news/2016/12/mobile-medicine-border/

18.

Arora

Kalishman

Dion

et al . Partnering urban academic medical centers and rural primary care clinicians to provide complex chronic disease care. Health Aff 2011;30:1176–84.

19.

Arora

Kalishman

Thornton

et al . Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment – Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology 2010;52:1124–33.

20.

Arora

Thornton

Murata

et al . Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2199–207.

21.

Katzman

Comerci

Jr Boyle

et al . Innovative telementoring for pain management: project ECHO pain. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2014;34:68–75.

22.

Colleran

Harding

Kipp

et al . Building capacity to reduce disparities in diabetes: training community health workers using an integrated distance learning model. Diabetes Educ 2012;38:386–96.

23.

Mercy . Mercy Ministries of Laredo. Available at: https://www.mercy.net/practice/mercy-ministries-of-laredo/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

24.

Gateway Community Health Center. Available at: gatewaychc.com/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

25.

American Society of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (ASSCP). Guidelines. Available at: http://www.asccp.org/asccp-guidelines (last accessed 23 June 2018).

26.

US Department of Health & Human Services. Health resources & services administration data warehouse. Available at: https://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/ (last accessed 23 June 2018).

27.

Texas Health and Human Services Commission: Women’s Health Services Division. Fiscal year 2017 policy and procedure manual: breast and cervical cancer services. Available at: https://hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/doing-business-with-hhs/providers/health/women/healthy-texas-women-provider-manual.pdf

28.

Texas Health and Human Services. BCCS eligibility. Available at: https://hhs.texas.gov/doing-business-hhs/provider-portals/health-services-providers/womens-health-services/healthy-texas-women/breast-cervical-cancer-services/bccs-eligibility

29.

Fisher-Hoch

Vatcheva

Laing

et al . Missed opportunities for diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia in a Mexican American population, Cameron county Hispanic cohort, 2003-2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:110298.

30.

Boone

Lewis

Karp

. Discontent and confusion: primary care providers’ opinions and understanding of current cervical cancer screening recommendations. J Womens Health 2016;25:255–62.

31.

Gonzalez

Atwood

Garcia

et al . Hispanics and cancer preventive behavior: the development of a behavioral model and its policy implications. J Health Soc Policy 1989;1:55–73.

32.

Wallace

Mendez-Luck

Castaneda

. Heading South: why Mexican immigrants in California seek health services in Mexico. Med Care 2009;47:662–9.

33.

Access to health-care and preventive services among Hispanics and non-Hispanics – United States, 2001-2002. MMWR Morbid Mortal W 2004;53:937–41.

34.

Carter-Pokras

Brown

Martinez

et al . Latin American-trained nurse perspective on Latino health disparities. J Trans Nurs 2008;19:161–6.

35.

Durden

Hummer

. Access to healthcare among working-aged Hispanic adults in the United States. Soc Sci Quar 2006;87:1319–43.

36.

Vistnes

Schone

. Pathways to coverage: the changing roles of public and private sources. Health Aff 2008;27:44–57.

37.

Solis

Marks

Garcia

et al . Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982-84. Am J Public Health 1990;80(Suppl):11–9.

38.

Seid

Castaneda

Mize

et al . Crossing the border for health care: access and primary care characteristics for young children of Latino farm workers along the US-Mexico border. Ambul Pediatr 2003;3:121–30.

39.

Zuvekas

Weinick

. Changes in access to care, 1977-1996: the role of health insurance. Health Serv Res 1999;34:271–9.

40.

Weinick

Zuvekas

Cohen

. Racial and ethnic differences in access to and use of health care services, 1977 to 1996. Med Care Res Rev 2000;57(Suppl 1):36–54.

41.

Landeck

Garza

. Utilization of physician health care services in Mexico by U.S. Hispanic border residents. Health Mark Q 2002;20:3–16.

42.

Bergmark

Barr

Garcia

. Mexican immigrants in the US living far from the border may return to Mexico for health services. J Immigr Minor Health 2010;12:610–4.

43.

Horton

Cole

. Medical returns: seeking health care in Mexico. Soc Sci Med 2011;72:1846–52.

44.

Reininger

Barroso

Mitchell-Bennett

et al . Socio-ecological influences on health-care access and navigation among persons of Mexican descent living on the U.S./Mexico border. J Immigr Minor Health 2014;16:218–228.

Perspectives on cervical cancer screening and prevention: challenges faced by providers and patients along the Texas–Mexico border

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Findings:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References