Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims:

Singing for Lung Health (SLH) is a novel intervention for individuals with respiratory disease. Qualitative results suggest benefits to physical, mental and emotional health. Limited data also suggest objective improvements in measures of quality of life with SLH are achievable. It is not known how effective the SLH groups supported by the British Lung Foundation (BLF) in the UK are. The objective was to understand the clinical impact SLH has on individuals with respiratory disease.

Methods:

The BLF conducted a questionnaire survey of singers with respiratory disease from new SLH groups set up in 2016–2017. Questionnaires were administered prior to participants’ first session and after 12 weeks of singing. Health-related quality of life, patient activation, anxiety and breathlessness outcomes were included. Healthcare resource utilisation including general practitioner (GP) visits, hospitalisations and frequency of inhaler use were recorded.

Results:

A total of 228 singers participated from 26 SLH groups in the UK. Participants were 70.7 (10.1) years old, 156 (68.4%) were female and 114 (47.5%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In all, 113 (49.5%) participants provided 12-week data. There were significant improvements in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (Mean = –1.4, CI: (−0.25 to −2.48) ( p = .017)). Furthermore, 45% of singers reported reduced GP visits ( p ≤ .001) and 18% reported reduced hospital admissions ( p = .01). However, there were no significant improvements in general quality of life, anxiety, patient activation, breathlessness or inhaler use. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between people who completed the 12-week evaluation and those who did not.

Conclusions:

This service evaluation found that participants in SLH groups report improvement in respiratory health-related quality of life and a reduction in healthcare utilisation. SLH has potential economic and health benefits. Therefore, to confirm these findings, these endpoints should be evaluated further in large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Keywords

Singing for Lung Health COPD asthma rehabilitation self-management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lewis

Cave

Stern

et al . Singing for Lung Health – a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2016; 26: 16080.

McNaughton

Aldington

Williams

et al . Sing your lungs out: a qualitative study of a community singing group for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BMJ Open 2016; 6(9): e012521.

Lord

Hume

Kelly

et al . Singing classes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med 2012; 12(1): 69.

Lord

Cave

Hume

et al . Singing teaching as a therapy for chronic respiratory disease – a randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation. BMC Pulm Med 2010; 10: 41–8.

Skingley

Page

Clift

et al . ‘Singing for breathing’: participants’ perceptions of a group singing programme for people with COPD. Arts Health 2014; 6(1): 59–74.

Morrison

Clift

Page

et al . A UK feasibility study on the value of singing for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). UNESCO Observ Mult Discip J 2013; 3(3): 1–19.

Bott

Blumenthal

Buxton

et al . Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical, spontaneously breathing patient. Thorax 2009; 64(Suppl. 1): 1–51.

Gick

Nicol

. Singing for respiratory health: theory, evidence and challenges. Health Promot Int 2016; 31(3): 725–34.

Baz

Haji

Menzies-Gow

et al . Dynamic laryngeal narrowing during exercise: a mechanism for generating intrinsic PEEP in COPD? Thorax 2015; 70(3): 251–7.

10.

Goldenberg

. Singing lessons for respiratory health: a literature review. J Voice 2018; 32(1): 321–94.

11.

Clift

Skingley

Page

et al . Singing for better breathing: findings from the Lambeth and Southwark singing and COPD project. Folkestone: Sidney De Haan Research Centre for Arts and Health; 2017, pp. 1–64.

12.

Skingley

Clift

Hurley

et al . Community singing groups for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: participant perspectives. Perspect Public Health 2018; 138(1): 66–75.

13.

Bonilha

Onofre

Vieira

et al . Effects of singing classes on pulmonary function and quality of life of COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2009; 4(1): 1–8.

14.

Lewis

Cave

Hopkinson

. Singing for Lung Health: a qualitative assessment of a British Lung Foundation Programme for group leaders. BMJ Open Respir Res 2017; 4(1): e000216.

15.

Jones

Harding

Berry

et al . Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J 2009; 34(3): 648–54.

16.

Alma

de Jong

Jelusic

et al . Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2016; 26: 16041.

17.

Kon

Canavan

Jones

et al . Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD assessment test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2(3): 195–203.

18.

Hibbard

Mahoney

Stock

et al . Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Serv Res 2007; 42(4): 1443–63.

19.

Mullerova

Landis

Aisanov

et al . Health behaviors and their correlates among participants in the Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 11: 881–90.

20.

Plummer

Manea

Trepel

et al . Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2016; 39: 24–31.

21.

Szende

Janssen

Cabases

. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht; Heidelberg; New York; London: Springer; 2014, pp. 1–210.

22.

Nolan

Longworth

Lord

et al . The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference. Thorax 2016; 71(6): 493–500.

23.

Poor

Rencz

. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in psoriasis patients. Qual Life Res 2017; 26(12): 3409–19.

24.

Bhandari

Wagner

. Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63(2): 217–35.

25.

Hoogendoorn

van Wetering

Schols

et al . Self-report versus care provider registration of healthcare utilization: impact on cost and cost-utility. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25(4): 588–95.

26.

Roberts

Bergstralh

Schmidt

et al . Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49(9): 989–95.

27.

Spruit

Singh

Garvey

et al . An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188(8): e13–64.

28.

Jones

. St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID. COPD 2005; 2(1): 75–9.

29.

Banzett

O’Donnell

Guilfoyle

et al . Multidimensional dyspnoea profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research. Eur Respir J 2015; 45(6): 1681–91.

30.

Yorke

Moosavi

Shuldham

et al . Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12. Thorax 2010; 65(1): 21–6.

31.

Steiner

Holzhauer-Barrie

Lowe

et al . Pulmonary rehabilitation: steps to breathe better National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Audit Programme: clinical audit of pulmonary rehabilitation services in England and Wales 2015. London: Royal College of Physcians; 2016, pp. 1–89.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

Singing for Lung Health: service evaluation of the British Lung Foundation programme

Abstract

Aims:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material