Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of the current study is to describe the prevalence and characteristics of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states to explore opportunities and overcome barriers to effective ASP implementation.

Methods:

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was used to evaluate the current status of ASP: major stewardship components, barriers of implementation and program impact in acute care hospitals of GCC states.

Results:

Forty-seven healthcare professionals responded from four GCC states, the majority from Saudi Arabia (81%). Twenty-nine (62%) participating hospitals had ASP in place. Of these established programs, 35 (75%) reported lack of funding and personnel as major barriers to program implementation. The top three objectives cited for the hospital ASP were to reduce resistance (72.3%), improve clinical outcomes (70.2%) and reduce costs (44.7%). The reported impact of existing ASP was reduction of inappropriate prescribing (68%), reduction of broad spectrum antibiotic use (63.8%), reduction of healthcare-associated infections (61.7%), reduction of length of stay or mortality metrics (59.6%), reduction in direct antibiotic cost (57.4%) and reduction of reported antibiotic resistance (55.3%).

Conclusion:

Survey participants from GCC states who have implemented ASP report significant impacts in the reduction of broad spectrum antibiotic use, hospital-acquired infection, inappropriate prescribing and antimicrobial resistance. These findings suggest a promising opportunity to enhance existing ASP through sharing of best practices and support the development of regional guidelines across GCC states.

Keywords

Antimicrobial stewardship antibiotics Saudi Arabia Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aly

Balkhy

. (2012) The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates from Gulf Corporation Council countries. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 1: 26.

Arnold

McDonald

Smith

Newman

Ramirez

. (2006) Improving antimicrobial use in the hospital setting by providing usage feedback to prescribing physicians. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 27: 378–382.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2011. Available at: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/NSQHS-Standards-Sept2011.pdf.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the US, 2013. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: www.cdc.gov/AntibioticResistanceThreats/index.html.

Cosgrove

Patel

Song

Miller

Speck

Banowetz

Hadler

Sinkowitz-Cochran

Cardo

Srinivasan

. (2007) Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28: 641–646.

Di Pentima

Chan

. (2010) Impact of antimicrobial stewardship program on vancomycin use in a pediatric teaching hospital. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 29: 707–711.

File

Jr Srinivasan

Bartlett

. (2014) Antimicrobial stewardship: importance for patient and public health. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59(S3): s93–96.

Forrest

Van Schooneveld

Kullar

Schulz

Duong

Postelnick

. (2014) Use of electronic health records and clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial stewardship. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59(S3): S122–133.

Johannsson

Beekmann

Srinivasan

Hersh

Laxminarayan

Polgreen

. (2011) Improving antimicrobial stewardship: the evolution of programmatic strategies and barriers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 32(4): 367–374.

10.

Kullar

Goff

Schulz

Fox

Rose

. (2013) The “epic” challenge of optimizing antimicrobial stewardship: the role of electronic medical records and technology. Clinical Infectious Diseases 57(7): 1005–1013.

11.

Nathan

Cars

. (2014) Antibiotic resistance – problems, progress and prospects. New England Journal of Medicine 371: 1761–1763.

12.

Paterson

. (2006) The role of antimicrobial management programs in optimizing antibiotic prescribing within hospitals. Clinical Infectious Diseases 42 (Suppl. 2): S90–95.

13.

Shibl

Memish

Kambal

Ohaly

Ishaq

Senok

Livermore

. (2014) National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-positive bacteria in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Chemotherapy 26(1): 13–18.

14.

Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. (2012) Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 33(4): 322–327.

15.

Trivedi

Dumartin

Gilchrist

Wade

Howard

. (2014) Identifying best practices across three countries: hospital antimicrobial stewardship in the United Kingdom, France, and the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59(S3): S170–178.

16.

Trivedi

Rosenberg

. (2013) The state of antimicrobial stewardship programs in California. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 34(4): 379–384.

17.

World Health Organization. (2013) Antibiotic resistance – a threat to global health security. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/drugresistance/activities/wha66_side_event/en/.

18.

Zowawi

Balkhy

Walsh

Paterson

. (2013) B-lactamase production in key Gram-negative pathogen isolates from the Arabian Peninsula. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 26(3): 361–380.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB