The National Health Service (NHS) in England continues to experience ongoing change in order to complete the transition to the new delivery system outlined in Liberating the NHS (Department of Health, 2010a). Treating and caring for patients in a safe environment and protecting them from acquiring avoidable infections remains a high priority and a central quality improvement component within the outcome Indicator set for 2013/14 (NHS Commissioning Board, 2012a). Infection prevention and control practitioners will be required to use a range of innovative quality improvement strategies to facilitate engagement with clinicians and meet the challenges that lie ahead for the NHS. The purpose of this paper is to report on the implementation of an infection prevention and control self-audit (IPCSA) project within general practice. The aim of the project was to empower practice staff to become actively involved with an infection prevention and control (IPC) audit in order to support the development of an IPC quality improvement culture within general practice teams. The paper outlines the methodology used to implement self-audit. The findings suggest that IPCSA can be used as an effective alternative to an IPC nurse-led infection prevention and control audit.
BlackN. (1992) The relationship between evaluative research and audit. Journal of Public Health Medicine14: 361–6.
2.
BowermanMRabyHHumphreyC. (2000) In search of the audit society: some evidence from health care police and schools. International Journal of Auditing4: 71–100.
3.
BowiePQuinnPPowerA. (2009) Independent feedback on clinical audit performance: a multi-professional pilot study. Clinical Governance: An International Journal14(3): 198–214.
4.
BowiePBradleyNARushmerR. (2010) Clinical audit and quality improvement: time for a rethink?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice18: 42–8.
5.
ChooV. (1998) Thin line between research and audit. Lancet352: 337–8.
6.
ClossSJCheaterFM. (1996) Audit or research – what is the difference?Journal of Clinical Nursing5: 249–56.
7.
DaviesHPowellARushmereR. (2007) Healthcare professionals views on clinician engagement in quality improvement: a literature. The Health Foundation: London.
8.
Department of Health. (1989a) Working for patients. Cm 555. HMSO: London.
9.
Department of Health. (1989b) Working for patients: working paper No 6 medical audit. HMSO: London.
10.
Department of Health. (1998) A first class service: quality in the new NHS. HMSO: London.
11.
Department of Health. (2000) The NHS plan. HMSO: London.
12.
Department of Health. (2010a) Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. Cm 7881. Stationery Office: London.
13.
Department of Health. (2010b) Health and Social Care Act. DH: London.
HayA. (2006) Audit in infection control. Journal of Hospital Infection62: 270–7.
16.
HillLSmallN. (2006) Differentiating between research, audit and quality improvement: governance implications. Clinical Governance: An International Journal11(2): 98–107.
17.
HoldenJD. (1999) Audit in British general practice: domination or disillusionment?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice53: 313–22.
18.
HumphreyCOwenD. (2000) Debating the ‘power’ of audit. International Journal of Auditing4: 29–50.
19.
Infection Control Nurses Association. (2005) Audit tools for monitoring infection control guidelines within the community setting. ICNA: Bathgate, UK.
20.
IversNJamtvedtGFlottorpSYoungJMOdgaard-JensenJFrenchSDO’BrienMAJohansenMGrimshawJOxmanAD. (2012) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Review. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.
21.
JohnstonGCrombieIKAlderEMDaviesHTOMillardA. (2000) Reviewing audit; barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Quality in Healthcare9: 123–36.
22.
KarapetrovicSWillbornW. (2001) Self-audit of process performance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management1: 24–45.
23.
KaufmanDM. (2003) Applying educational theory in practice. British Medical Journal326: 213–16.
24.
LevyBRockallT (2009) The role of clinical audit in clinical governance. Surgery Journal27(9): 367–70.
25.
LynnJ. (2004) When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge. Quality and Safety in Health Care13: 67–70.
26.
MillwardSBarnettJThomlinsonD. (1993) A clinical infection control audit programme: evaluation of an audit tool used by infection control nurses to monitor standards and assess effective staff training. Journal of Hospital Infection24: 219–32.
NiZKarapetrovicS. (2003) Perennial self-audit: model and applications. Managerial Auditing Journal18(5): 363–73.
30.
PaxtonRWhittyPZaatarAFairbainALothianJ. (2006) Research audit and quality improvement. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance19(1): 105–11.
31.
PowerM. (1994) The audit explosion. Demos: London.
32.
RixGCuttingK. (1996) Clinical audit: the case for ethical scrutiny. International Journal of Healthcare Quality Assurance9(6): 18–20.
33.
SchonD. (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
34.
SiriwardenaAN. (2009) Engaging clinicians in quality improvement initiatives; art or science?Quality in Primary Care17: 303–5.
35.
SkinnerDSpiraLF. (2003) Trust and control – a symbiotic relationship?Corporate Governance3(4): 28–35.
36.
SmithHERussellGIFrewAJDawesPT. (1992) Medical audit: the differing perspectives of managers and clinicians. Journal of Royal College of Physicians26: 177–80.
37.
WadeDT. (2005) Ethics audit and research: all shades of grey. British Medical Journal303: 468–71.
38.
WarlowC. (2004) Clinical research under the cosh again. British Medical Journal329: 241–2.
39.
WilsonAGrimshawGBakerR. (1999) Differentiating between audit and research: postal survey of health authorities’ views. British Medical Journal319: 1235–41.
40.
ZwarensteinMGoldmanJReevesS. (2009) Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Review. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester.
