Abstract
The study assessed the impact on nursing home (NH) resident infection rates of providing staff with a personal alcohol-based hand product (ABHP) with and without training on its use.
Fifteen North Wales NHs were recruited and randomly allocated into one of three groups. All monitored infection rates throughout the study period of 18 weeks (Phase I [weeks 1—9], Phase II [weeks 11—19]). NHs used liquid soap and water for hand washing throughout the study. Groups B and C introduced interventions during week ten: Group B were provided with personal ABHPs without training on use; Group C personal ABHPs with standard training from the sponsoring hand hygiene company. Infection rates between groups and pre- and post-intervention were compared.
Infection rates (per 1,000 bed days) for Phase I vs. Phase II of the study were: Group A: 6.99 vs. 7.16; Group B: 6.08 vs. 3.46; and Group C: 5.04 vs. 6.78 respectively. Change in infection rates in Groups B and C pre- and post-intervention did not reach statistical significance, p = 0.097 and p = 0.072 respectively.
Comparison of rates in non-intervention Group A with the intervention groups indicated a significantly lower rate after the intervention in Group B (p = 0.035) but not Group C (p = 0.765).
Findings are limited due to sample size; introduction of personal ABHPs with training did not reduce infection rates. This conflicts with other studies examining education and improvement of hand hygiene compliance. However, infection rates fell in NHs not receiving training, possibly mediated through a sense of `ownership' of the intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.