In an attempt to reduce infection rates following coronary artery bypass graft surgery, surveillance was introduced that included post-discharge follow-up. Prospective surveillance was conducted over two periods, each of three-month duration.
Collated data indicated that using a sample size of 218 patients, 6.4% of infections occurred following discharge from the acute setting. These results had not previously been identified by the surveillance of the rate of surgical site infections occurring in in-patients alone.
AvatoJLLaiKK (2002) Impact of post-discharge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology23(7): 364–7.
2.
EmmersonAMEnstoneJEGriffinMKelseyMCSmythETM (1996) The second national prevalence survey of infection in hospitals: overview of results. Journal of Hospital Infection32: 175–90.
3.
HaleyR. (1995) The scientific basis for using surveillance and risk factor data to reduce nosocomial infection rates. Journal of Hospital Infection30: 3–14.
4.
HaleyRWCulverDHWhiteJWMorganWMEmoriTGMunnVP (1985) The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. American Journal of Epidemiology121: 182–205.
5.
HoltzTHWenzelRP (1992) Post-discharge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary. American Journal of Infection Control20: 206–13.
6.
HormanTCGaynesRPMartoneWJJarvisWREmoniTG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections. American Journal of Infection Control20: 271–4.
7.
JenneyAHarrintonGRussoPSpelmanD. (2001) Cost of surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass surgery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery71: 662–4.
8.
MitchellDHSwiftGGilbertGH (1999) Surgical wound infection surveillance: the importance of infections that develop after discharge. Australian and New Zealand journal of Surgery69: 117–20.
9.
National Audit Press Office. (2000) The management and control of hospital acquired infection in acute NHS Trusts in England. HC 230 session, 1999: 17th February 2000.
10.
NoyDCreedyD. (2002) Post-discharge surveillance surgical site infections: a multi-method approach to data collection. American Journal of Infection Control30: 417–24.
11.
PlowmanRCravenNGriffinMRobertsJ. (1999) The socio-economic burden of hospital acquired infection. London. Public Health Laboratory Service: London.
12.
RidderstolpeLGillHGranfeldtHAhfeldtHRutbergH. (2001) Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality. European Journal of Cardio Thoracic Surgery20: 1168–75.
13.
SandsKVineyardGPlattR. (1996) Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. Journal of Infectious Diseases173: 963–70.
14.
SmythETMEmmersonAM (1996) Survey of infections in hospitals: use of an automated data entry system. Journal of hospital infection34: 87–97.
15.
StockleyJMAllenRMThomlinsonDFConstantineCE (2001) A district hospital's method of post-discharge follow-up developed over a five-year period. Journal of Hospital Infection49: 48–54.
