Abstract

The following text did not appear correctly in the article:
“OS for the favorable/intermediate prognostic groups (according to MSKCC criteria) was not reached (NR)/12 months while PFS was 25/17 months. For the favorable/intermediate prognostic groups as assessed according to Heng criteria, OS was NR/12 months while PFS was NR/25 months.”
The correct text reads as follows:
“PFS for the favorable/intermediate prognostic groups (according to MSKCC criteria) was not reached (NR)/12 months while OS was 25/17 months. For the favorable/intermediate prognostic groups as assessed according to Heng criteria, PFS was NR/12 months while OS was NR/25 months.”
The authors apologize for this error in their submission.
