AmendolaJASegreAMMillerAC, et al. (2023) Using thermal imaging to track cellulitis. Open Forum Infectious Diseases10(5): ofad214. DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofad214.
2.
AtkinLBućkoZConde MonteroE, et al. (2019) Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds. Journal of Wound Care28(Sup3a): S1–S49. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3a.S1.
3.
AtkinLTettelbachW (2019) TIMERS: expanding wound care beyond the focus of the wound. British Journal of Nursing28(20): S34–S37. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.20.S34.
4.
FarooquiMFShamimA (2016) Low cost inkjet printed smart bandage for wireless monitoring of chronic wounds. Scientific Reports6: 28949. DOI: 10.1038/srep28949.
5.
GaoYNguyenDTYeoT, et al. (2021) A flexible multiplexed immunosensor for point-of-care in situ wound monitoring. Science Advances7(21): eabg9614. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg9614.
6.
GodauBJardimAPaganE, et al. (2025) In vivo validation of a smart sensor-enabled dressing for remote wound monitoring. Biosensors & Bioelectronics285: 117474. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117474.
7.
GuestJFAyoubNMcIlwraithT, et al. (2015) Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open5: e009283. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283.
8.
HaidariHVasilevKCowinA, et al. (2022) Bacteria-activated dual pH- and temperature-responsive hydrogel for targeted elimination of infection and improved wound healing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces14(39): 43980–43995. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c11453.
9.
HuangXDengLHuangJ, et al. (2023) The ratio of serum uric acid to glycosylated haemoglobin as a predictor of all-mortality in elderly patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy16: 2779–2790. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S423017.
10.
KalasinSSangnuangPSurareungchaiW (2022) Intelligent wearable sensors interconnected with advanced wound dressing bandages for contactless chronic skin monitoring: artificial intelligence for predicting tissue regeneration. Analytical Chemistry94(5): 2345–2353. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04759.
11.
KoLNRaffABGarza-MayersAC, et al. (2018) Skin surface temperatures measured by thermal imaging aid in the diagnosis of cellulitis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology138(3): 520–526. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.022.
12.
LiMWangCYuQ, et al. (2024) A wearable and stretchable dual-wavelength LED device for home care of chronic infected wounds. Nature Communications15: 53579. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53579-6.
13.
MiraniBHadisiZPaganE, et al. (2023) Smart dual-sensor wound dressing for monitoring cutaneous wounds. Advanced Healthcare Materials12(18): e2203233. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202203233.
14.
MiraniBPaganECurrieB, et al. (2017) An advanced multifunctional hydrogel-based dressing for wound monitoring and drug delivery. Advanced Healthcare Materials6(19): 1700718. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700718.
15.
MostafaluPTamayolARahimiR, et al. (2018) Smart bandage for monitoring and treatment of chronic wounds. Small14(33): 1703509. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201703509.
16.
O’CallaghanSGalvinPO’MahonyC, et al. (2020) ‘Smart’ wound dressings for advanced wound care: a review. Journal of Wound Care29(7): 394–406. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.7.394.
17.
OhYSKimJHXieZ, et al. (2021) Battery-free, wireless soft sensors for continuous multi-site measurements of pressure and temperature from patients at risk for pressure injuries. Nature Communications12: 5008. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25324-w.
18.
PalAGoswamiDCuellarHE, et al. (2018) Early detection and monitoring of chronic wounds using low-cost, omniphobic paper-based smart bandages. Biosensors & Bioelectronics117: 696–705. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.060.
19.
PangQLouDLiS, et al. (2020) Smart flexible electronics-integrated wound dressing for real-time monitoring and on-demand treatment of infected wounds. Advanced Science7(15): 1902673. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902673.
20.
PunjiyaMMostafaluPSonkusaleS (2017a) Smart bandages for chronic wound monitoring and on-demand drug delivery. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Boston, MA, 6–9 August. New York: IEEE, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/MWSCAS.2017.8052965.
21.
PunjiyaMNejadHRMostafaluP, et al. (2017b) pH sensing threads with CMOS readout for smart bandages. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Baltimore, MD, 28–31 May. New York: IEEE, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ISCAS.2017.8050981.
22.
PunjiyaMRezaeiHZeeshanMA, et al. (2017c) A flexible pH sensing smart bandage with wireless CMOS readout for chronic wound monitoring. In: 19th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 18–22 June. New York: IEEE, pp. 1700–1702. DOI: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2017.7994413.
23.
RahimiRBrenerUOchoaM, et al. (2017) Flexible and transparent pH monitoring system with NFC communication for wound monitoring applications. In: IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMS and Nanophotonics (OMN), Las Vegas, NV, 22–26 January. New York: IEEE, pp. 1–2. DOI: 10.1109/OMN.2017.8078394.
24.
Rezvani GhomiENiaziMRamakrishnaS (2022) The evolution of wound dressings: From traditional to smart dressings. Polymers for Advanced Technologies34(2): 520–530. DOI: 10.1002/pat.5929.
25.
SinghHLiWKazemianM, et al. (2019) Lipase-responsive electrospun theranostic wound dressing for simultaneous recognition and treatment of wound infection. ACS Applied Bio Materials2(1): 327–338. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.8b00741.
26.
WangXGaoXZhangJ, et al. (2019) Engineered bioresorbable conductive materials for real-time monitoring and eradication of biofilm-infected wounds. ACS Nano13(9): 10279–10292. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05608.
27.
WinterGD (1962) Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature193: 293–294. DOI: 10.1038/193293a0.
28.
XuGLuYChengC, et al. (2021) Battery-free and wireless smart wound dressing for wound infection monitoring and electrically controlled on-demand drug delivery. Advanced Functional Materials31(26): 2100852. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202100852.