Medical professionalism is an evolving entity, requiring continual development according to shifting societal priorities. The public trust that underpins the medical profession is imperative for maintaining effective partnerships with patients, their families and the wider community. This article provides an overview of what constitutes medical professionalism, including the current protocols and assessments for general practice training. The aim is to improve understanding of the current issues surrounding professionalism in primary care. Fictional case scenarios are used to illustrate modern professional dilemmas and to promote reflection on the complex interacting factors that influence professional practice and clinical decision-making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cooper-MossNSmithNChauhanU (2020) The importance of significant event analysis. InnovAiT13(10): 613–7. DOI: 10.1177/1755738020941231.
2.
CruessSRCruessRL (2008) Understanding medical professionalism: A plea for an inclusive and integrated approach. Medical Education42(8): 755–757. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03134.x.
Edelstein L (1943) The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
5.
GeorgeDRRovniakLSKraschnewskiJL (2013) Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology56(3): 453–462. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318297dc38.
6.
Ghaye T and Lillyman S (2010) Reflection: Principles and Practices for Healthcare Professionals. London: Quay Books.
Greenhalgh T, Koh GC and Car J (2020) Covid-19: A remote assessment in primary care. The BMJ 368: m1182. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1182.
11.
HamiltonJS (1986) Scribonius Largus on the medical profession. Bulletin of the History of Medicine60(2): 209–216.
12.
HiltonS (2004) Medical professionalism: How can we encourage it in our students?The Clinical Teacher1(2): 69–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2004.00032.x.
13.
Iacobucci G (2020) Doctors still at “considerable risk” from lack of PPE, BMA warns. The BMJ 368: m1316. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1316.
14.
Jasper M, Rosser M and Mooney G (2013) Professional Development, Reflection and Decision-making in Nursing and Healthcare. Swansea: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.
JonesR (2019) In place of fear. British Journal of General Practice69(685): 371DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704669.
16.
Li H, Ding N, Zhang Y, et al. (2017) Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties. PLoS ONE 12(5): e0177321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177321.
17.
LynchDCSurdykPMEiserAR (2004) Assessing professionalism: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher26(4): 366–373. DOI: 10.1080/01421590410001696434.
Monrouxe LV and Rees CE (2017) Healthcare Professionalism: Improving Practice through Reflections on Workplace Dilemmas. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
O’ShaughnessySMJoyceP (2015) Summative and formative assessment in medicine: The experience of an anaesthesia trainee. International Journal of Higher Education4(2): 198–206. DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p198.
23.
PapanikitasA (2017) Self-awareness and professionalism. InnovAiT10(8): 452–457. DOI: 10.1177/1755738017710962.
RosenDH (1992) Inborn basis for the healing doctor-patient relationship. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society55(4): 17–21.
26.
Royal College of Physicians (2005) Doctors in society: Medical professionalism in a changing world. Report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. Available at: www.rcplondon.ac.uk/file/11741/download?token=p-lUq0QX (accessed 16 May 2021).
27.
Shi W and Jiao Y (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: A live class on medical professionalism. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine hcaa157. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa157.
28.
Thornton J (2020) Covid-19: How coronavirus will change the face of general practice forever. The BMJ 368: m1279. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1279.
Van MookWNde GraveWSWassV, et al. (2009) Professionalism: Evolution of the concept. European Journal of Internal Medicine20(4): 81–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.10.005.
