Exploring Eurasian integration through the lenses of Carl Schmitt: The Eurasian Economic Union as an example of Schmittian “Great Space”

Abstract

The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) embodies Russia’s latest attempt to restore interconnections among former Soviet countries through economic means rather than military might. The literature on the EAEU views the initiative as a geopolitical tool, a post-imperial escamotage, a platform to enhance reforms, or a counterhegemonic strategy. This article wishes to understand the EAEU as an example of Carl Schmitt’s theorizations, especially in relation to the concept of Great Space. The EAEU resembles the Schmittian Great Space in four main respects: the existence of a regional hegemon with spheres of interest beyond its fixed borders, the expression of an “imperial” community of cultural and historical affinity, the overcome of the rigid Westphalian state model expressed by the jus publicum Europeaum in favor of a large space, and the manifestation of the nomos of the Earth, that is a telluric civilization within the Schmittian contraposition between Land and Sea. The application of the Schmittian Great Space paradigm to the EAEU—in tandem with the proliferation of other regional integration initiatives and organizations—confirms the ongoing global shift from rigid Westphalian nation-states to highly integrated political-economic blocs based on civilizational identity in the frame of a multipolar world.

Keywords

Carl Schmitt Eurasian Economic Union Eurasian integration geo-economic space Great Space

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

(2012) Comparative regionalism: A field whose time has come? The International Spectator 47(1): 3–15.

Auer

(2015) Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine crisis and the return of geopolitics. International Affairs 91(5): 953–968.

Axtmann

(2007) Humanity or enmity? Carl Schmitt on international politics. International Politics 44(5): 531–551.

Balakrishnan

(2000) The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.

Bond

(2017) The EU, the Eurasian Economic Union and One Belt, One Road: Can They Work Together? London: Center for European Reform, pp.1–13.

Burgess

(2009) The new nomos of Europe. Geopolitics 14(1): 135–160.

Casier

(2016) From logic of competition to conflict: Understanding the dynamics of EU–Russia relations. Contemporary Politics 22(3): 376–394.

Croce

Salvatore

(2012) The Legal Theory of Carl Schmitt. Abingdon: Routledge.

Dean

(2006) A political mythology of world order: Carl Schmitt’s Nomos. Theory Culture & Society 23(5): 1–22.

10.

Delcour

Kostanyan

(2014) Towards a fragmented neighbourhood: Policies of the EU and Russia and their consequences for the area that lies in between. CEPS Essays 17: 1–10.

11.

Delcour

Kostanyan

Vandecasteele

, et al. (2015) The implications of Eurasian integration for the EU’s relations with the countries in the post-Soviet space. Studia Diplomatica 68(1): 5–34.

12.

Dobbs

(2015) The Eurasian Economic Union: A bridge to nowhere? European Leadership Network Policy Brief (4 March). Available at: https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-brief/the-eurasian-economic-union-a-bridge-to-nowhere/ (accessed 5 October 2021).

13.

Dragneva-Lewers

(2016) Can the Eurasian Economic Union be a part of a new constructive EU-Russia settlement? Dahrendorf Forum (13 May). Available at: http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/can-the-eurasian-economic-union-be-a-part-of-a-new-constructive-eu-russia-settlement/ (accessed 15 September 2021).

14.

Dragneva

(2021) Pork, peace and principles: The relations between the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union. In: Lorenzmeier

Petrov

Vedder

(eds) EU External Relations Law: Shared Competences and Shared Values in Agreements Between the EU and Its Eastern Neighbourhood. Cham: Springer, pp.229–252.

15.

Dragneva

Wolczuk

(2012) Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, stagnation or rivalry? Chatham House Briefing Paper 1: 1–16.

16.

Dragneva

Wolczuk

(2013) The Eurasian Customs Union: Framing the analysis. In: Dragneva

Wolczuk

(eds) Eurasian Economic Integration: Law Policy and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.1–12.

17.

Dreyer

Popescu

(2014) The Eurasian Customs Union: The Economics and the Politics. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), pp.1–4.

18.

Dugin

(2012) The Fourth Political Theory. London: Arktos.

19.

Dugin

(2014) Eurasian Mission: An Introduction to Neo-Eurasianism. London: Arktos.

20.

Dugin

(2015) Last War of the World-Island. London: Arktos.

21.

Dugin

(2017) The Rise of the Fourth Political Theory. London: Arktos.

22.

Elden

(2011) Reading Schmitt geopolitically: Nomos, territory and Großraum. In: Legg

(ed.) Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt. Geographies of the Nomos. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.91–102.

23.

Eurasian Economic Commission (2015) Eurasian economic integration: Facts and figures. Available at: http://www.eurasiancommission.org/en/Documents/broshura26_ENGL_2014.pdf (accessed 12 August 2021).

24.

Eurasian Economic Union (2016) Trade and Investment Agreements Handbook, vol. 1. Washington, DC: International Business Publications.

25.

Fawcett

(2008) Regionalism in world politics: Past and present. In: Kösler

Zimmek

(eds) Elements of Regional Integration. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp.13–28.

26.

Frye

(1966) Carl Schmitt’s concept of the political. The Journal of Politics 28(4): 818–830.

27.

Haas

(1958) Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

28.

Haukkala

(2015) From cooperative to contested Europe? The conflict in Ukraine as a culmination of a long-term crisis in EU–Russia relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23(1): 25–40.

29.

Hohendahl

(2018) Perilous Futures: On Carl Schmitt’s Late Writings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

30.

Hooker

(2009) Carl Schmitt’s International Thought: Order and Orientation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

International Crisis Group (2016) The Eurasian Economic Union: Power, politics and trade. Europe and Central Asia. Report No 240.

32.

Jovchelovitch

(2019) Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.

33.

Kalyvas

(2009) The Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Kaplan

(2013) The Revenge of Geography. What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.

35.

Keohane

Nye

(1973) Power and interdependence. Survival 15(4): 158–165.

36.

Kirkham

(2016) The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies 7(2): 111–128.

37.

Kuznetsova

(2017) Greater Eurasia: Perceptions from Russia, the European Union, and China. In: Schulze

(ed.) Core Europe and Greater Eurasia: A Roadmap for the Future. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, pp.177–196.

38.

Legg

(ed.)(2011) Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt. Geographies of the Nomos. Abingdon: Routledge.

39.

Lewis

(2020) Russia’s New Authoritarianism: Putin and the Politics of Order. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

40.

Libin

Patapan

(2020) Schmitt Fever: The use and abuse of Carl Schmitt in contemporary China. International Journal of Constitutional Law 18(1): 130–146.

41.

Libman

(2020) (Mis)interpreting the Eurasian Economic Union? Images of the EAEU in Russia and the west. In: Parlar Dal

Emre

(eds) Russia in the Changing International System. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.77–94.

42.

Mackinder

(1904) The geographical pivot of history. Geographical Journal 23(4): 421–321.

43.

Mackinder

(1919) Democratic Ideals and Realities. A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. London: Constable & Co. Ltd.

44.

Mackinder

(1943) The round world and the winning of the peace. Foreign Affairs 21(4): 595–605.

45.

Mahan

(1890) The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

46.

Marder

(2010) Groundless Existence: The Political Ontology of Carl Schmitt. London: Continuum.

47.

Matrakova

(2020) Political transitions in EU-Russia shared neighbourhood: Geopolitics and values as opportunities or challenges for the quality of democracy. PhD Diss.

48.

Meister

(2016) There is no consensus in the EU on cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union. Russian International Affairs Council (21 September). Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/shtefan-mayster-v-es-net-konsensusa-po-voprosu-o-sotrudniche/?sphrase_id=70238484 (accessed 21 September 2021).

49.

Mendieta

(2011) Land and sea. In: Legg

(ed.) Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt. Geographies of the Nomos. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.260–267.

50.

Minca

Rowan

(2015) The question of space in Carl Schmitt. Progress in Human Geography 39(3): 268–289.

51.

Minca

Vaughan-Williams

(2012) Carl Schmitt and the concept of the border. Geopolitics 17(4): 756–772.

52.

Moravcsik

(1993) Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.

53.

Murphy

(1997) The Heroic Earth: Geopolitical Thought in Weimar Germany, 1918-1933. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.

54.

Naumann

(1915) Mitteleuropa. Berlin: Georg Reimer Verlag.

55.

Neal

(2010) Exceptionalism and the Politics of Counter-Terrorism. Abingdon: Routledge.

56.

Odysseos

Petito

(eds) (2007) The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt. Abingdon: Routledge.

57.

Pabst

(2017) Europe’s commonwealth: Greater Europe beyond core EU and economic Eurasia. In: Schulze

(ed.) Core Europe and Greater Eurasia: A Roadmap for the Future. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, pp.71–93.

58.

Pizzolo

(2020a) Eurasianism: An Ideology for the Multipolar World. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

59.

Pizzolo

(2020b) Eurasian versus Euro-Atlantic integration in the South Caucasus: Successes, failures, and stalemates. Small Wars Journal (11 August). Available at: https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/eurasian-versus-euro-atlantic-integration-south-caucasus-successes-failures-and-stalemates (accessed 3 October 2021).

60.

Pizzolo

(2021) La Maledizione Dello Spazio. Il Pensiero Geopolitico Nazista e Il Sogno Di Hitler Di Un Impero in Eurasia. Rome: Aracne Editrice.

61.

Pizzolo

Carteny

(2022) The “New Great Game” in Central Asia: From a Sino-Russian axis of convenience to Chinese primacy? The International Spectator 57(2): 85–102.

62.

Prozorov

(2010) Ethos without nomos: The Russian–Georgian war and the post-Soviet state of exception. Ethics & Global Politics 3(4): 255–275.

63.

Putin

(2011) Novyy integratsionnyy proyekt dlya Yevraziy – Budushcheye kotoroye rozhdayetsya segodnya [A new integration project for Eurasia – the future, which is being born today]. Izvestiya (3 October). Available at: http://komitet.info/eurasian-integration/eurasia-project-history/338/ (accessed 31 August 2021).

64.

Putin

(2013) Meeting of the Valdai international discussion club, Novgorod region (19 September). Available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19243/videos (accessed 31 August 2021).

65.

Putin

(2023) Address by President of Russia Vladimir Putin to heads of Eurasian Economic Union member states (23 January). Available at: https://russiaeu.ru/en/news/address-president-russia-vladimir-putin-heads-eurasian-economic-union-member-states (accessed 1 February 2023).

66.

Ratzel

(1896) Der Staat und Sein Boden Geographisch Betrachtet [The State and Its Soil Viewed Geographically]. Leipzig: Hirzel.

67.

Ratzel

(1904) Das Alter und die Allgemeinheit der nationalitätenbedingungen [The age and generalization of nationality conditions]. Historische Zeitschrift 93: 1–46.

68.

Rosamond

(2000) Theories of European Integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

69.

Salter

(2012) Carl Schmitt: Law as Politics, Ideology and Strategic Myth. Abingdon: Routledge.

70.

Schmitt

(1997 [1954]) Land and Sea: A World-Historical Meditation. Corvallis, OR: Plutarch Press.

71.

Schmitt

(2003 [1950]) The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europeaum. New York: Telos Press.

72.

Schmitt

(2004 [1963]) Theory of the Partisan. Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

73.

Schmitt

(2007 [1932]) The Concept of the Political, expand edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

74.

Schmitt

(2011a [1941]) The Großraum order of international law with a ban on intervention for spatially foreign powers: A contribution to the Concept of Reich in International Law (1939-1941). In: Schmitt

(ed.) Writings on War. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.75–124.

75.

Schmitt

(2011b [1939]) Großraum versus universalism. The international legal struggle over the Monroe Doctrine. In: Legg

(ed.) Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt. Geographies of the Nomos. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.46–54.

76.

Schneider

(2020) Rapprochement between the EU and the EAEU offers more than economic benefits. European Leadership Network Policy Brief (27 January). Available at: https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/rapprochement-between-the-eu-and-the-eaeu-offers-more-than-economic-benefits/ (accessed 5 October 2021).

77.

Schulze

(ed.) (2017) Core Europe and Greater Eurasia: A Roadmap for the Future. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

78.

Shapiro

(2010) Carl Schmitt and the Intensification of Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

79.

Shendrikova

(2015) Going regional the Russian way: The Eurasian Economic Union between instrumentalism and global social appropriateness. GR:EEN Working Paper Series, 54, pp.1–21.

80.

Slomp

(2009) Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

81.

Söderbaum

(2016) Old, new, and comparative regionalism. In: Börzel

Risse

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.16–37.

82.

Taubes

(2013) To Carl Schmitt: Letters and Reflections. New York: Columbia University Press.

83.

Ter-Matevosyan

Drnoian

Mkrtchyan

, et al. (2017) Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union: Reasons for joining and its consequences. Eurasian Geography and Economics 58(3): 340–360.

84.

Valdai Discussion Club (2015) Toward the Great Ocean-3: Creating Central Eurasia. Valdai Discussion Club Report (4 June). Available at: https://valdaiclub.com/a/reports/toward_the_great_ocean_3_creating_central_eurasia/ (accessed 7 September 2021).

85.

Van Herpen

(2015) Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

86.

Vaughan-Williams

(2009) Border Politics: The Limits of Sovereign Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

87.

Vinokurov

(2017) Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results. Russian Journal of Economics 3(1): 54–70.

88.

Wolczuk

Dragneva

(2017) The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. London: Chatham House Research Paper, pp.1–15.

89.

Zheng

(2015) Carl Schmitt, Mao Zedong and the Politics of Transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

90.

Zotti

Fassi

(2018) The EU and the EAEU: Normative power and geopolitics in EU-Russia shared neighbourhood. In: Pashayeva

Frappi

(eds) Cooperation in Eurasia: Linking identity, security, and development. Milan: Ledizioni, pp.21–52.