This article investigates the contradictions between public health protocols and infection containment efforts concerning Zika virus and reproductive rights. In El Salvador, for example, women are being advised to avoid pregnancy until 2018, at which time local authorities hope that the virus will be under control. This is not so easy, however, as there is limited access to contraception, abortion is illegal in all instances, and women tend to have little household authority. In this article, I examine the policy, legal, and political contradictions related to the global proliferation of Zika virus in the context of ongoing debates about stratified reproduction. This term conceptualizes the phenomenon that accords different values to reproductive tasks undertaken by women in different socioeconomic, cultural, and national contexts. Whereas reproduction and reproductive autonomy tend to be highly respected and protected for relatively privileged women in the Global North, they tend to be much less so for women of the Global South. Furthermore, the adherence to public and private divisions in both national and transnational contexts segregates reproductive rights from the mainstream of political negotiation and public health intervention, and in doing so frustrates progress toward the realization of global reproductive rights.
ColenS (1995) “Like a mother to them”: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In: GinsburgFRappR (eds) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 78–102.
11.
FarmerP (1999) Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
12.
FarmerP (2003) Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
13.
FarmerPKimJYKleinmanA. (eds) (2013) Reimagining Global Health: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
GinsburgFRappR (1991) The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology20: 311–344.
16.
GreeneJBasilicoMTKimHFarmerP. (2013) Colonial medicine and its legacies. In: FarmerPKimJYKleinmanABasilicoM. (eds) Reimagining Global Health: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 33–73.
17.
GrimesS (1998) From population control to “reproductive rights”: Ideological influences in population policy. Third World Quarterly19(3): 375–393.
18.
HannaBKleinmanA (2013) Unpacking global health: Theory and critique. In: FarmerPKimJYKleinmanA. (eds) Reimagining Global Health: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 15–32.
19.
HoughCA (2010) Loss in childbearing among Gambia’s kanyalengs: Using a stratified reproduction framework to expand the scope of sexual and reproductive health. Social Science & Medicine71(10): 1757–1763.
McDougallL (2016) Discourse, ideas and power in global health policy networks: Political attention for maternal and child health in the millennium development goal era. Globalization and Health12(21): 1–14.
SchoenJ (2005) Choice and Coercion: Birth Control, Sterilization, and Abortion in Public Health and Welfare. Chapel Hill, NC; London: The University of North Carolina Press.
WhaleyEP (2004) Global Population Policy: From Population Control to Reproductive Rights. Aldershot: Ashgate.
40.
WhittakerASpeierA (2010) “Cycling overseas”: Care, commodification, and stratification in cross-border reproductive travel. Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness29(4): 363–383.
