Illegal state actions are sometimes interpreted as civil disobedience. Yet, liberal theorists insist that, to count as such, states must intend to reform the systemic imperfections of the international legal order. Moreover, states must have the capacity to engineer such reforms responsibly. These requirements result in an elitist conception of international civil disobedience because weaker states cannot refashion the key rules of the international legal order. By introducing a broader conception of resistance than found in existing theory, I show how weaker states can still engage in civil disobedience. A conceptual framework of two types of power supports my argument: constituent power and destituent power. If state action were expressed through these two types of power, then more states and more types of illegal action would count as examples of civil disobedience.
BuchananA (2001) From Nuremberg to Kosovo: The morality of illegal international legal reform. Ethics111(4): 673–705.
6.
BuchananA (2003) Reforming the international law of humanitarian intervention. In: HolzgrefeJLKeohaneRO (eds) Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–173.
7.
BuchananA (2004) Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DyzenhausD (2012) Constitutionalism in an old key: Legality and constituent power. Global Constitutionalism1(2): 229–260.
9.
GoodinRE (2005) Toward an international rule of law: Distinguishing international law-breakers from would-be law-makers. The Journal of Ethics9(1/2): 225–246.
10.
HoagRW (2007) Violent civil disobedience: Defending human rights, rethinking just war. In: BroughMWLangoJWvan der LindenH (eds) Rethinking the Just War Tradition. Albany, NY: State University of New York, pp. 223–242.
11.
HurdI (2011) Is humanitarian intervention legal? The rule of law in an incoherent world. Ethics & International Affairs25(3): 293–313.
KantI (2006) Toward perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In: KleingeldP (ed.) Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 66–109.
14.
KingML (1973) Letter from Birmingham Jail. In: CrawfordC (ed.) Civil Disobedience: A Casebook. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, pp. 229–235.
15.
LaudaniR (2013) Disobedience in Western Political Thought: A Genealogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LingPJ (2002) Martin Luther King, Jr. New York: Routledge.
17.
LyonsD (1998) Moral judgment, historical reality, and civil disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs27(1): 31–49.
18.
MiddletonS (1987) The fugitive slave crisis in Cincinnati, 1850-1860: Resistance, enforcement, and Black refugees. The Journal of Negro History72(1/2): 20–32.
19.
MurphyC (2009) Power and responsibility in the global community. In: FranceschetA (ed.) The Ethics of Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., pp. 159–167.
20.
NeubauerG. (2009) State civil disobedience: Morally justified violations of international law considered as civil disobedience. No. 86, TranState working papers. Available at: http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/27899
21.
PerryL (2013) Civil Disobedience: An American Tradition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
23.
SchabasW (2009) International crimes. In: ArmstrongD (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Law. New York: Routledge, pp. 268–280.
24.
ThornhillC (2012) Contemporary constitutionalism and the dialectic of constituent power. Global Constitutionalism1(3): 369–404.
25.
WaltonHJr (1971) The Political Philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Corporation.
