The responsibility to protect: Words,deeds and humanitarian interventions

Alvarez JE (2008) The schizophrenia of R2P. In: MacDonald E Alston P (eds) Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–284.

Annan K (1999) Two concepts of sovereignty. The Economist, pp. 51–52. Available at: http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sg/stories/kaecon.html (accessed 15 March 2014).

Arbour L (2008) The responsibility to protect as a duty of care in international law and practice. Review of International Studies 34(3): 445–458.

Arbour L (2013) Entmachtet die Großmächte. Die ZEIT, 14 November. Available at: http://www.zeit.de/2013/47/intervention-vereinte-nationen (accessed 29 J 2014).

Badescu CG Weiss TG (2010) Misrepresenting R2P and advancing norms: An alternative spiral? International Studies Perspective 11(4): 354–374.

Bain W (2010) Responsibility and obligation in the ‘Responsibility to Protect’. Review of International Studies 36(Suppl. 1): 25–46.

Bellamy AJ (2011) Global Politics and The Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Brown C Ainley K (2009) Understanding International Relations. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brunnée J Toope SJ (2010) The responsibility to protect and the use of force: Building legality? Global Responsibility to Protect 2(3): 191–212.

Chandler D (2004) The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘liberal peace’. International Peacekeeping 11(1): 59–81.

Deitelhoff N (2006) Überzeugung in der Politik: Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen Regierens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Deitelhoff N (2009) The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization 63(1): 33–65.

Deitelhoff N Zimmermann L (2013) Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the validity of international norms. Working Papers, 18. Frankfurt am Main: HSFK. Available at: http://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/downloads/PRIF_WP_18.pdf (accessed 15 March 2014).

Finnemore M Sikkink K (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.

Flynn G Farrell H (1999) Piecing together the democratic peace: The CSCE, norms and the ‘construction’ of security in Post-Cold War Europe. International Organization 53(3): 505–535.

Gallagher A Ralph J (2013) Syria: Can legitimacy for intervention be found in a Uniting for Peace Resolution? BSS Leeds. Available at: http://www.bss.leeds.ac.uk/2013/09/05/syria-can-legitimacy-for-intervention-be-found-in-a-uniting-for-peace-resolution/ (accessed 15 March 2014).

Gholiagha S (2013) From Kosovo to Syria: Why R2P is of no use if the UN Security Council is unable to act together. Verfassungsblog. Available at: http://www.verfassungsblog.de/en/r2p-responsibility-to-protect-syrien-sicherheitsrat-voelkerrecht/ (accessed 15 March 2014).

Gholiagha S Wiener A (2013) Responsibility to Protect: A political science perspective on the international law section of the coalition agreement. Verfassungsblog. Available at: http://www.verfassungsblog.de/en/responsibility-to-protect-a-political-science-perspective-on-the-international-law-section-of-the-coalition-agreement (accessed 29 June 2014).

Hehir A (2010a) The responsibility to protect in international political discourse: Encouraging statement of intent or illusory platitudes? International Journal of Human Rights 15(8): 1–18.

Hehir A (2010b) The responsibility to protect: ‘Sound and fury signifying nothing’? International Relations 24(2): 218–239.

Hehir A (2012) The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holzscheiter A (2014) Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations. International Studies Perspective 15(2): 142–162.

Kratochwil FV (2014) The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liese A (2009) Exceptional necessity: How liberal democracies contest the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment when countering terrorism. Journal of International Law and International Relations 5(1): 17–48.

Loges B (2013) Schutz als neue Norm in den internationalen Beziehungen. Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und die Etablierung der Responsibility to Protect. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Milliken J (1999) The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225–254.

Milliken J (2001) Discourse study: Bringing rigor to critical theory. In: Fierke KM Jorgensen KE (eds) Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation. Armonk, NY and London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 136–159.

Onuf NG (1989) World of our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Onuf NG (1998) Constructivism: A user’s manual. In: Kubalkova V Onuf NG Kowert P (eds) International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY and London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 58–78.

Onuf NG (2013) Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.

Orford A (2011) International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair A (2010) International Relations Theory and International Law: A Critical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stamnes E (2009) ‘Speaking R2P’ and the prevention of mass atrocities. Global Responsibility to Protect 1(1): 70–89.

Ulbert C (2012) Vom Klang vieler Stimmen: Herausforderungen ‘kritischer’ Normenforschung. Eine Replik auf Stephan Engelkamp, Katharina Glaab und Judith Renner. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 19(2): 129–130.

Weiss TG (2011) RtoP alive and well after Libya. Ethics and International Affairs 25(3): 287–292.

Welsh J (2013) Norm contestation and the responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 5(4): 365–396.

Wiener A (2003) Die Wende zum Dialog: Konstruktivistische Brueckenstationen und ihre Zukunft. In: Hellmann G Wolf KD Zuern M (eds) Forschungsstand und Perspektiven der Internationalen Beziehungen in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 133–159.

Wiener A (2007) The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the state: Sociological and normative approaches to ‘interaction’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(1): 47–69.

Wiener A (2008) The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiener A (2009) Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35(1): 175–193.

Wiener A (2014) A Theory of Contestation. Berlin: Springer

Wiener A Puetter U (2009) The quality of norms is what actors make of it: Constructivist research on norms. Journal of International Law and International Relations 5(1): 1–16.