This study aimed to compare the aerodynamics of a shoulder amputee cyclist through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and mathematical models. The geometry of the cyclist-bicycle system was collected by a Sense 3D scanner. The boundaries around the bicycle-cyclist system were defined on Ansys Workbench software. The velocities were set between 1 and 13 m/s with increments of 1 m/s. To compare the drag, ANOVA and simple linear regression models between CFD and mathematical models for absolute values and logarithmic transformations were used. No statistically significant variations between CFD and the analytical procedures were found (F = 0.335; p = 0.800; η2 = 0.021). The linear regression models between CFD and analytical procedures showed a very high adjustment for drag in absolute values for Pugh, Schneau, and Nonweiler (R2 = 0.996; Ra2 = 0.992; SEE = 0.933) and after logarithmic transformation (R2 = 0.996; Ra2 = 0.995; SEE = 0.046).
FortePMarinhoDABarbosaTM.Estimation of an elite road cyclist mechanical power and energy cost wearing standard and aero helmets: an analytical procedure and numerical simulations approach. Eur J Hum Mov2021; 46: 4–15.
2.
FortePMarinhoDABarbosaTM, et al. Estimation of an elite road cyclist performance in different positions based on numerical simulations and analytical procedures. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 538–547.
3.
ScaranoFTerraWSciacchitanoA.Investigation of the drag crisis on the leg of a cycling mannequin by means of robotic volumetric PIV. In: 15th International conference on fluid control, measurements and visualization, Naples, Italy, May 2019, pp.27–30.
4.
TerraWSciacchitanoAScaranoF.Cyclist Reynolds number effects and drag crisis distribution. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics2020; 200: 104143.
5.
FortePMoraisJEP. NeivaH, et al. The drag crisis phenomenon on an elite road cyclist—a preliminary numerical simulations analysis in the aero position at different speeds. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17(14): 1–9.
6.
BlockenBvan DruenenTToparlarY, et al. Aerodynamic drag in cycling pelotons: new insights by CFD simulation and wind tunnel testing. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics2018; 179: 319–337.
7.
BlockenBvan DruenenTToparlarY, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of different cyclist hill descent positions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics2018; 181: 27–45.
8.
FortePMarinhoDANikolaidisPT, et al. Analysis of cyclist’s drag on the aero position using numerical simulations and analytical procedures: a case study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17(10): 3430–3439. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103430
9.
GarimellaRPeetersTParrillaE, et al. Estimating cycling aerodynamic performance using anthropometric measures. Appl Sci2020; 10(23): 8635.
10.
DebrauxPGrappeFManolovaAV, et al. Aerodynamic drag in cycling: methods of assessment. Sports Biomech2011; 10(3): 197–218.
11.
FortePMarinhoDAMoraisJE, et al. The variations on the aerodynamics of a world-ranked wheelchair sprinter in the key-moments of the stroke cycle: a numerical simulation analysis. PLoS One2018; 13(2): 1–12.
12.
CandauRBGrappeFMénardM, et al. Simplified deceleration method for assessment of resistive forces in cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc1999; 31(10): 1441–1447.
WilliamsonC.Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu Rev FluidMech2003; 28(1): 477–539.
15.
PerrinRBrazaMCidE, et al. Near-wake turbulence properties in the high Reynolds number incompressible flow around a circular cylinder measured by two- and three-component PIV. Flow Turbul Combust2006; 77(1): 185–204.
16.
RodríguezILehmkuhlOChivaJ, et al. On the flow past a circular cylinder from critical to super-critical Reynolds numbers: wake topology and vortex shedding. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2015; 55: 91–103.
17.
HeilDP.Body mass scaling of projected frontal area in competitive cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol2001; 85(3-4): 358–366.
18.
BlockenBDefraeyeTKoninckxE, et al. CFD simulations of the aerodynamic drag of two drafting cyclists. Comput Fluids2013; 71: 435–445.
19.
DefraeyeTBlockenBKoninckxE, et al. Aerodynamic study of different cyclist positions: CFD analysis and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. J Biomech2010; 43(7): 1262–1268.
20.
FortePMoraisJEBarbosaTM, et al. Assessment of able-bodied and amputee cyclists’ aerodynamics by computational fluid dynamics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2021; 9: 163.
21.
FortePMarinhoDASilveiraR, et al. The aerodynamics and energy cost assessment of an able-bodied cyclist and amputated models by computer fluid dynamics. Medicinar2020; 56(5): 241.
22.
DyerB.The importance of aerodynamics for prosthetic limb design used by competitive cyclists with an amputation: an introduction. Prosthet Orthot Int2015; 39(3): 232–237.
23.
FortePBarbosaTMMarinhoDA. Technologic appliance and performance concerns in wheelchair racing – helping Paralympic athletes to excel. In: New Perspectives in Fluid Dynamics. London: IntechOpen, 2015, pp. 101–121.
24.
PetersM. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. London: Springer, 2024, p.18.
25.
MarinhoDAWillemsenDBarbosaTM, et al. Numerical simulations of a swimmer’s head and cap wearing different types of goggles. Sports Biomech2021; 23(9): 1123–1213.
26.
BertucciWMBetikACDucS, et al. Gross efficiency and cycling economy are higher in the field as compared with on an axiom stationary ergometer. J Appl Biomech2012; 28(6): 636–644.
27.
El HelouNBerthelotGThibaultV, et al. Tour de France, Giro, Vuelta, and classic European races show a unique progression of road cycling speed in the last 20 years. J Sports Sci2010; 28(7): 789–796.
28.
FitzgeraldSKelsoRGrimshawP, et al. Measurement of the air velocity and turbulence in a simulated track cycling team pursuit race. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics2019; 190: 322–330.
29.
RaiesiHPiomelliUPollardA.Evaluation of turbulence models using direct numerical and large-eddy simulation data. J Fluid Eng2011; 133(2): 21203-1–21203–10.
30.
de LevaP. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech1996; 29(9): 1223–1230.
31.
FergusonCJ (ed.). An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. In: FergusonCJ (ed.) Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. 4th ed.Washington: American Psychological Association, 2015, pp.301–310.
32.
BarbosaTMRamosRSilvaAJ, et al. Assessment of passive drag in swimming by numerical simulation and analytical procedure. J Sports Sci2018; 36(5): 492–498.
33.
BarbosaTMMoraisJEForteP, et al. A comparison of experimental and analytical procedures to measure passive drag in human swimming. PLoS One2015; 10(7): e0130868.
