Training intensity (TI) monitoring has become a necessary aspect of professional soccer training. This study systematically reviewed the original investigations that have reported values regarding TI across macrocycles, mesocycles, and one-, two-, and three-match day (MD) microcycles in professional soccer, to analyze TI variations among months, weeks, and training sessions, respectively. A systematic review of PubMed, and FECYT (Web of Sciences, CCC, DIIDW, KJD, MEDLINE, RSCI, and SCIELO) was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The articles were included following these criteria: (i) professional soccer players, (ii) players monitored for TI values, (iii) TI distribution in, at least, 3 days, weeks, or months, (iv) variables related to TI (physical/physiological), and (v) original studies. The quality assessment of included articles was done using MINORS checklist. From the 473 studies initially identified, 19 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. In microcycles, most articles showed lower values in MD+1 and progressively incremented until MD-4 or MD-3. As the number of days between matches decreased, TI values decreased, with values in MD-1 lower than 50% of MD’s intensity, or even values <50% in all sessions between matches in 3 MD microcycles. The variability standard in mesocycles was less clear. In macrocycles, TI was greater in the preseason than the values in the last stages of the in-season period. In conclusion, coaches may design a post-match recovery strategy followed by an increase in intensity until MD-3. Regarding mesocycles, a week-to-week TI prescription was the most common due to the different demands that are experienced during a match with different contextual factors. Finally, despite slight variations in intensity/volume between preseason and in-season periods during macrocycles, overall TI is similar for both time periods. However, training volume is usually reduced while intensity is kept high.
StauntonCAAbtGWeavingD, et al. Misuse of the term ‘load’ in sport and exercise science. J Sci Med Sport2021; 25(5): 439–444.
2.
ImpellizzeriFMMarcoraSMCouttsAJ.Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2019; 14: 270–273.
3.
ImpellizzeriFMMcCallAWardP, et al. Training load and its role in injury prevention, part 2: conceptual and methodologic pitfalls. J Athl Train2020; 55: 893–901.
4.
ImpellizzeriFMMenaspàPCouttsAJ, et al. Training load and its role in injury prevention, part I: back to the future. J Athl Train2020; 55: 885–892.
5.
BourdonPCCardinaleMMurrayA, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: S2-161–S2-170.
6.
MiguelMOliveiraRLoureiroN, et al. Load measures in training/match monitoring in soccer: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 2721.
7.
Rico-GonzálezMMendez-VillanuevaALos ArcosA. Training load periodization in soccer with one official match a week: a systematic review. In: AlviraDCRaya-GonzálezJ (eds) An essential guide to sports performance. New York: NOVA Science Publisher, 2020, pp.123–166.
8.
HaderKRumpfMCHertzogM, et al. Monitoring the athlete match response: can external load variables predict post-match acute and residual fatigue in soccer? a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med Open2019; 5: 1–19.
9.
AndradeRWikEHRebelo MarquesA, et al. Is the acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) associated with risk of time-loss injury in professional team sports? a systematic review of methodology, variables and injury risk in practical situations. Sports Med2020; 50: 1613–1635.
10.
DrewMKFinchCF.The relationship between training load and injury, illness and soreness: a systematic and literature review. Sports Med2016; 46: 861–883.
11.
HalsonSL.Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med2014; 44: 139–147.
12.
BowenLGrossASGimpelM, et al. Accumulated workloads and the acute: chronic workload ratio relate to injury risk in elite youth football players. Br J Sports Med2017; 51: 452–459.
13.
StolenTChamariKCastagnaC, et al. Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med2005; 35: 501–536.
ChenMJFanXMoeST.Criterion-related validity of the borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 873–899.
16.
Pino-OrtegaJRico-GonzálezM. The use of applied technology in team sport. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
17.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021;372: n71.
18.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 134: 103–112.
19.
PRISMA-SGroupRethlefsenMLKirtleyS, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev2021; 10: 39.
20.
Rico-GonzálezMPino-OrtegaJClementeFM, et al. Guidelines for performing systematic reviews in sports science. Biol Sport2022; 39: 463–471.
21.
Group CCCR. Data extraction template for included studies.
22.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al. Original article methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors). ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
23.
MalageladaFSahiradCDalmau PastorM, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical techniques. Int Orthop (SICOT)2019; 43: 625–637.
24.
NairRKahlenbergCAHsuWK.Outcomes of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes: the need for high-level evidence. Clin Orthop Related Res2015; 473: 1971–1977.
25.
Martín GarcíaAGómez DíazABradleyPS, et al. Quantification of a professional football team’s external load using a microcycle structure. J Strength Conditioning Res2018; 32: 3511–3518.
26.
OwenALLago PeñasCGómezMÁ, et al. Analysis of a training mesocycle and positional quantification in elite European soccer players. Int J Sports Sci Coaching2017; 12: 665–676.
27.
OwenALDjaouiLNewtonM, et al. A contemporary multi-modal mechanical approach to training monitoring in elite professional soccer. Sci Med Football2017; 1: 216–221.
28.
GonçalvesLGCKalva FilhoCANakamuraFY, et al. Effects of match-related contextual factors on weekly load responses in professional brazilian soccer players. IJERPH2020; 17: 5163.
29.
OliveiraRBritoJMartinsA, et al. In-season training load quantification of one-, two- and three-game week schedules in a top European professional soccer team. Physiol Behav2019; 201: 146–156.
30.
SpringhamMWilliamsSWaldronM, et al. Prior workload has moderate effects on high-intensity match performance in elite-level professional football players when controlling for situational and contextual variables. J Sports Sci2020; 38: 2279–2290.
31.
AndersonLOrmePDi MicheleR, et al. Quantification of training load during one-, two- and three-game week schedules in professional soccer players from the english premier league: implications for carbohydrate periodisation. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1250–1259.
32.
KellyDMStrudwickAJAtkinsonG, et al. Quantification of training and match-load distribution across a season in elite English premier league soccer players. Sci Med Football2020; 4: 59–67.
33.
RagoVBritoJFigueiredoP, et al. Relationship between external load and perceptual responses to training in professional football: effects of quantification method. Sports2019; 7: 68.
34.
OliveiraRBritoJPMartinsA, et al. In-season internal and external training load quantification of an elite European soccer team. PLoS One2019; 14: e0209393.
35.
OliveiraRBritoJPLoureiroN, et al. Does the distribution of the weekly training load account for the match results of elite professional soccer players?Physiol Behav2020; 225: 113118.
36.
RagoVRebeloAKrustrupP, et al. Contextual variables and training load throughout a competitive period in a top-level male soccer team. J Strength Cond Res2021; 35: 3177–3183.
37.
MaloneJJDi MicheleRMorgansR, et al. Seasonal training-load quantification in elite english premier league soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015; 10: 489–497.
38.
CoppalleSRavéGMoranJ, et al. Internal and external training load in under-19 versus professional soccer players during the in-season period. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 558.
39.
AndersonLOrmePMicheleRD, et al. Quantification of seasonal-long physical load in soccer players with different starting status from the English premier league: implications for maintaining squad physical fitness. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2016; 11: 1038–1046.
40.
ClementeFMSilvaRCastilloD, et al. Weekly load variations of distance-based variables in professional soccer players: a full-season study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 3300.
41.
ReyECorredoiraFCostaPB, et al. Acute effects of training load on contractile properties during a competitive microcycle in elite soccer players. Biol Sport2020; 37: 157–163.
42.
Penedo JamardoEReyEPadrón CaboA, et al. The impact of different recovery times between matches on physical and technical performance according to playing positions. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 271–282.
43.
ClementeFMClarkCCastilloD, et al. Variations of training load, monotony, and strain and dose-response relationships with maximal aerobic speed, maximal oxygen uptake, and isokinetic strength in professional soccer players. PLoS One2019; 14: e0225522.
44.
FaveroTGWhiteJ.Periodization in college soccer. Strength Conditioning J2018; 40: 33–44.
45.
SarmentoHMarcelinoRAngueraMT, et al. Match analysis in football: a systematic review. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1831–1843.
46.
ChmuraPKonefałMChmuraJ, et al. Match outcome and running performance in different intensity ranges among elite soccer players. Biol Sport2018; 35: 197.
47.
AlexandreDDa SilvaCDHill HaasS, et al. Heart rate monitoring in soccer: interest and limits during competitive match play and training, practical application. J Strength Cond Res2012; 26: 2890–2906.
48.
BangsboJ.Physiological demands of football. Sports Sci Exchange2014; 27: 1–6.
49.
HarperDJCarlingCKielyJ.High intensity acceleration and deceleration demands in elite team sports competitive match play: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Sports Med2019; 49: 1923–1947.
50.
AkenheadRHayesPRThompsonKG, et al. Diminutions of acceleration and deceleration output during professional football match play. J Sci Med Sport2013; 16: 556–561.
51.
NédélecMMcCallACarlingC, et al. Recovery in soccer: part I – post-match fatigue and time course of recovery. Sports Med2012; 42: 997–1015.
52.
Rico-GonzálezMPino-OrtegaJClementeFM, et al. Relationship between training load management and immunoglobulin a to avoid immunosuppression after soccer training and competition: a theoretical framework based on covid-19 for athletes’ healthcare. Healthcare2021; 9: 856.
53.
SlimaniMBakerJSCheourF, et al. Steroid hormones and psychological responses to soccer matches: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2017; 12: e0186100.
54.
SaidiKAbderrahmanABHackneyAC, et al. Hematology, hormones, inflammation, and muscle damage in elite and professional soccer players: a systematic review with implications for exercise. Sports Med2021; 51: 2607–2627.
55.
NobariHPraçaGMClementeFM, et al. Comparisons of new body load and metabolic power average workload indices between starters and non-starters: a full-season study in professional soccer players. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering Technology2021; 235(2): 105–113.
56.
NobariHSilvaRClementeFM, et al. Variations of external workload across a soccer season for starters and non-starters. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering Technology2021; 21: 17543371211039297.
57.
MorgansROrmePAndersonL, et al. An intensive winter fixture schedule induces a transient fall in salivary IgA in English premier league soccer players. Res Sports Med2014; 22: 346–354.
58.
MoreiraAArsatiFCuryPR, et al. Salivary immunoglobulin a response to a match in top-level Brazilian soccer players. J Strength Conditioning Res2009; 23: 1968–1973.
59.
NédélecMMcCallACarlingC, et al. Recovery in soccer: part ii—recovery strategies. Sports Med2013; 43: 9–22.
60.
ClementeFMAfonsoJCostaJ, et al. Relationships between Sleep, athletic and match performance, training load, and injuries: a systematic review of soccer players. Healthcare2021; 9: 808.
61.
SilvaJRRumpfMCHertzogM, et al. Acute and residual soccer match-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2018; 48: 539–583.
62.
JulianRPageRMHarperLD.The effect of fixture congestion on performance during professional male soccer match-play: a systematic critical review with meta-analysis. Sports Med2021; 51: 255–273.
63.
AkenheadRNassisGP.Training load and player monitoring in high-level football: current practice and perceptions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2016; 11: 587–593.
64.
FosterC.Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exercise1998; 30: 1164–1168.
65.
WindtJGabbettTJ.Is it all for naught? What does mathematical coupling mean for acute:chronic workload ratios?Br J Sports Med2019; 53: 988–990.
66.
EnrightKGreenMHayG, et al. Workload and injury in professional soccer players: role of injury tissue type and injury severity. Int J Sports Med2020; 41: 89–97.
67.
FanchiniMRampininiERiggioM, et al. Despite association, the acute: chronic work load ratio does not predict non-contact injury in elite footballers. Sci Med Football2018; 2: 108–114.
68.
ImpellizzeriFMWoodcockSCouttsAJ, et al. What role do chronic workloads play in the acute to chronic workload ratio? Time to dismiss ACWR and its underlying theory. Sports Med2021; 51: 581–592.
69.
BarrettSMcLarenSSpearsI, et al. The influence of playing position and contextual factors on soccer players’ match differential ratings of perceived exertion: a preliminary investigation. Sports2018; 6: 13.
70.
CurtisRMHugginsRABenjaminCL, et al. Contextual factors influencing external and internal training loads in collegiate men’s soccer. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 374–381.
71.
AquinoRGonçalvesLGGalgaroM, et al. Match running performance in Brazilian professional soccer players: comparisons between successful and unsuccessful teams. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2021; 13: 93.
72.
Granero GilPBastida CastilloARojas ValverdeD, et al. Influence of contextual variables in the changes of direction and centripetal force generated during an elite-level soccer team season. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 967.
73.
Oliva LozanoJMRojas ValverdeDGómez CarmonaCD, et al. Worst case scenario match analysis and contextual variables in professional soccer players: a longitudinal study. Biol Sport2020; 37: 429–436.
74.
ChenaMMorcilloJARodríguez HernándezML, et al. The effect of weekly training load across a competitive microcycle on contextual variables in professional soccer. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 5091.
75.
BarreraJSarmentoHClementeFM, et al. The effect of contextual variables on match performance across different playing positions in professional Portuguese soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 5175.
76.
NobariHBanoocyNKOliveiraR, et al. Win, draw, or lose? Global positioning system-based variables’ effect on the match outcome: a full-season study on an Iranian professional soccer team. Sensors2021; 21: 5695.
77.
Guerrero CalderónBKlempMCastillo RodriguezA, et al. A new approach for training-load quantification in elite-level soccer: contextual factors. Int J Sports Med2021; 42(8): 716–723.
78.
NovakARImpellizzeriFMTrivediA, et al. Analysis of the worst-case scenarios in an elite football team: towards a better understanding and application. J Sports Sci2021; 39(16): 1850–1859.
79.
VolpiPBisciottiGNChamariK, et al. Risk factors of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football players: a systematic review of the literature. Muscle Ligaments Tendons J2016; 6(4): 480–485.
80.
SlimaniMNikolaidisPT.Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of male soccer players according to their competitive level, playing position and age group: a systematic review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2019; 59(1):141–163.
81.
GonçalvesLGCClementeFPalucci VieiraLH, et al. Effects of match location, quality of opposition, match outcome and playing position on load parameters and players’ prominence during official matches in professional soccer players. Hum Mov2021; 22(3): 35–44.
82.
BialkowskiALuceyPCarrP, et al. Win at home and draw away: automatic formation analysis highlighting the differences in home and away team behaviors. In: Proceedings of 8th annual MIT sloan sports analytics conference, Boston, MA, 2014, pp. 1–7.
83.
Rico-GonzálezMLos ArcosARojas-ValverdeD, et al. A survey to assess the quality of the data obtained by radio-frequency technologies and microelectromechanical systems to measure external workload and collective behavior variables in team sports. Sensors2020; 20(8): 2271.
