Effect of outdoor footwear bending stiffness on metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics,kinetics,and energy balance during level and uphill walking

Abstract

In outdoor footwear, sole properties must guarantee grip with the ground and support the forefoot without altering the kinematics of the metatarsophalangeal joints (MPJ). The present study aimed to implement an objective measure of shoe bending stiffness and investigate the effect of shoes with different bending stiffness on MPJ kinematics, kinetics, and energy balance during walking. The bending stiffness of four shoes was calculated using a customized flexometer. Then, the influence of each footwear on MPJ biomechanics during level and uphill walking was investigated with a motion capture system and a force plate on 10 healthy subjects. Results showed that MPJ peak dorsiflexion angle, stiffness, and energy balance were affected both by shoe bending stiffness (p<0.001) and walking slope (p<0.001). The findings of the study, which quantify the influence of shoe stiffness on MPJ biomechanics, will be helpful in the design of outdoor footwear.

Keywords

Footwear metatarsophalangeal joint shoe bending stiffness level and uphill walking forefoot biomechanics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Macchiavelli

Pozzi

Young people and mountain: evidence from a survey in the Northern Italy. Rev Geogr Alpine J Alp Res 2014; 102: 67–91.

ISO 20344:2011. BSI Standards Publication Personal protective equipment—test methods for footwear. International Organization for Standardization.

Mistretta

Parolini

Marcolin

, et al. The influence of outdoor shoe sole stiffness on the metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics when walking and running in different conditions. Proceedings 2018; 2: 275.

Park

The bending stiffness of shoes is beneficial to running energetics if it does not disturb the natural MTP joint flexion. J Biomech 2017; 53: 127–135.

Oleson

Adler

Goldsmith

A comparison of forefoot stiffness in running and running shoe bending stiffness. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1886–1894.

Fraser

Harland

Smith

, et al. A study of football footwear bending stiffness. Procedia Eng 2014; 72: 315–320.

Latash

Zatsiorsky

VM.

Joint stiffness: myth or reality?

Hum Mov Sci 1993; 12: 653–692.

Mager

Richards

Hennies

, et al. Determination of ankle and metatarsophalangeal stiffness during walking and jogging. J Appl Biomech 2018; 34: 448–453.

Lin

Chen

CPC

Tang

SFT

, et al. Changes in windlass effect in response to different shoe and insole designs during walking. Gait Posture 2013; 37: 235–241.

10.

Stefanyshyn

Nigg

BM.

Influence of midsole bending stiffness on joint energy and jump height performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 471–476.

11.

Stefanyshyn

Nigg

BM.

Mechanical energy contribution of the metatarsophalangeal joint to running and sprinting. J Biomech 1997; 30: 1081–1085.

12.

Ray

Takahashi

KZ.

Gearing up the human ankle-foot system to reduce energy cost of fast walking. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 1–12.

13.

Roy

JPR

Stefanyshyn

. Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 562–569.

14.

Yang

Liu

, et al. The relative contributions of sagittal, frontal, and transverse joint works to self-paced incline and decline slope walking. J Biomech 2019; 92: 35–44.

15.

Smith

Lake

Lees

, et al. Measurement procedures affect the interpretation of metatarsophalangeal joint function during accelerated sprinting. J Sports Sci 2012; 30: 1521–1527.

16.

Day

Hahn

ME.

A comparison of metatarsophalangeal joint center locations on estimated joint moments during running. J Biomech 2019; 86: 64–70.

17.

Cavanagh

PR.

ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech 1995; 28: 1257–1261.

18.

Neumann

Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal system. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002.