The main aim of this work was to review the use of technological tracking methods to assess collective spatial-positioning variables in team sports. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and PICO design for systematic reviews, study identification was performed in four databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, ProQuest Central, and Web of Science). Articles were selected if they focused on player position and technological tracking methods. After duplicate removal, 2194 articles were identified based on the established search criteria, of which 72 articles were selected and analysed. Semi-automatic optic-based systems, Global Positioning System/Global Navigation Satellite Systems, and local positioning systems were used in 60%, 33% and 7% of the studies, respectively. All studies that measured tactical variables by local positioning system technology in team sports used local position measurement technology. Optic-based systems were used more often in the early years to analyse collective tactical behaviour during competition. Later, Global Positioning System/Global Navigation Satellite Systems became more frequent to measure behaviour in team sports during the training process. The possibility of using the same system during competition and training will facilitate the assessment of collective tactical behaviour in team sports.
AlarifiAAl-SalmanAAlsalehM, et al. Ultra wideband indoor positioning technologies: analysis and recent advances. Sensors2016; 16: 707.
2.
CastellanoJSilvaPUsabiagaO, et al. The influence of scoring targets and outer-floaters on attacking and defending team dispersion, shape and creation of space during small-sided soccer games. J Hum Kinet2016; 51: 153–163.
3.
GonçalvesBSantosSMateusN, et al. Individual and collective creativity in young footballers. Egitania Sciencia2015; 8: 33–39.
4.
GonçalvesBVFigueiraBEMaçãsV, et al. Effect of player position on movement behaviour, physical and physiological performances during an 11-a-side football game. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 191–199.
5.
SampaioJELagoCGonçalvesB, et al. Effects of pacing, status and unbalance in time motion variables, heart rate and tactical behaviour when playing 5-a-side football small-sided games. J Sci Med Sport2014; 17: 229–233.
6.
SilvaPVilarLDavidsK, et al. Sports teams as complex adaptive systems: manipulating player numbers shapes behaviours during football small-sided games. SpringerPlus2016; 5: 191.
7.
Rico-GonzálezMLos ArcosANakamuraFY, et al. The use of technology and sampling frequency to measure variables of tactical positioning in team sports: a systematic review. Res Sports Med2020; 28: 279–292.
8.
AraújoDDavidsK. Team synergies in sport: theory and measures. Front Psychol2016; 7: 1449.
9.
MemmertDLemminkKAPMSampaioJ. Current approaches to tactical performance analyses in soccer using position data. Sports Med2017; 47: 1–10.
10.
LowBCoutinhoDGonçalvesB, et al. A systematic review of collective tactical behaviours in football using positional data. Sports Med2019; 50: 343–385.
11.
ReinRMemmertD. Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: future challenges and opportunities for sports science. SpringerPlus2016; 5: 1410.
12.
JacksonBMPolglazeTDawsonB, et al. Comparing global positioning system and global navigation satellite system measures of team-sport movements. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2018; 13: 1005–1010.
13.
TreviñoG. Trilateración: Sismos, GPS, rayos y teléfonos celulares, y la XIX Olimpiada de Ciencias de la Tierra. GEOS2014; 34: 15.
14.
LarssonP. Global positioning system and sport-specific testing. Sports Med2003; 33: 1093–1101.
15.
MaloneJJLovellRVarleyMC, et al. Unpacking the black box: applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: 18–26.
16.
ScottMTUScottTJKellyVG. The validity and reliability of global positioning systems in team sport: a brief review. J Strength Condition Res2015; 30: 1470–1490.
17.
WinterDA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2009.
18.
Bastida CastilloAGómez CarmonaCDDe la Cruz SánchezE, et al. Accuracy, intra- and inter-unit reliability, and comparison between GPS and UWB-based position-tracking systems used for time–motion analyses in soccer. Eur J Sport Sci2018; 18: 450–457.
19.
RidolfiMVandermeerenSDefrayeJ, et al. Experimental evaluation of UWB indoor positioning for sport postures. Sensors2018; 18: 168.
20.
LeserRSchleindlhuberALyonsK, et al. Accuracy of an UWB-based position tracking system used for time-motion analyses in game sports. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 14(7): 635–642.
21.
BuenoMJde O CaetanoFG, et al. How do futsal players of different categories play during official matches? A tactical approach to players’ organization on the court from positional data. PLoS ONE2018; 13: e0199619.
22.
OlthofSBHFrenckenWGPLemminkKAPM. Match-derived relative pitch area changes the physical and team tactical performance of elite soccer players in small-sided soccer games. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 1557–1563.
23.
MouraFASantanaJEMarcheAL, et al. Quantitative analysis of the futsal players’ organization on the court. Port J Sport Sci2011; 11: 105–108.
24.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000097.
25.
SampaioJMaçãsV. Measuring tactical behaviour in football. Int J Sports Med2012; 33: 395–401.
26.
SilvaPDuarteRSampaioJ, et al. Field dimension and skill level constrain team tactical behaviours in small-sided and conditioned games in football. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1888–1896.
27.
SilvaPTravassosBVilarL, et al. Numerical relations and skill level constrain co-adaptive behaviors of agents in sports teams. PLoS ONE2014; 9: e107112.
28.
FolgadoHDuarteRFernandesO, et al. Competing with lower level opponents decreases intra-team movement synchronization and time-motion demands during pre-season soccer matches. PLoS ONE2014; 9: e97145.
29.
SampaioJGonçalvesBRenteroL, et al. Exploring how basketball players’ tactical performances can be affected by activity workload. Sci Sports2014; 29: e23–e30.
30.
TravassosBGonçalvesBMarcelinoR, et al. How perceiving additional targets modifies teams’ tactical behavior during football small-sided games. Hum Mov Sci2014; 38: 241–250.
31.
AguiarMGonçalvesBBotelhoG, et al. Footballers’ movement behaviour during 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-a-side small-sided games. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 1259–1266.
32.
RicATorrentsCGonçalvesB, et al. Soft-assembled multilevel dynamics of tactical behaviors in soccer. Front Psychol2016; 7: 1513.
33.
PraçaGMFolgadoHAndradeAGP, et al. Comportamento tático coletivo em Pequenos Jogos no Futebol: influência de jogadores adicionais. Braz J Kinanthropometry Hum Perform2016; 18: 62.
34.
BarnabéLVolossovitchADuarteR, et al. Age-related effects of practice experience on collective behaviours of football players in small-sided games. Hum Mov Sci2016; 48: 74–81.
35.
TimmermanEAFarrowDSavelsberghGJ. The effect of manipulating task constraints on game performance in youth field hockey. Int J Sports Sci Coach2017; 12: 588–594.
36.
GonçalvesBEstevesPFolgadoH, et al. Effects of pitch area-restrictions on tactical behavior, physical, and physiological performances in soccer large-sided games. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 2398–2408.
37.
RicATorrentsCGonçalvesB, et al. Dynamics of tactical behaviour in association football when manipulating players’ space of interaction. PLoS ONE2017; 12: e0180773.
38.
CoutinhoDGonçalvesBTravassosB, et al. Mental fatigue and spatial references impair soccer players’ physical and tactical performances. Front Psychol2017; 8: 1645.
39.
FolgadoHGonçalvesBSampaioJ. Positional synchronization affects physical and physiological responses to preseason in professional football (soccer). Res Sports Med2018; 26: 51–63.
40.
CoutinhoDGonçalvesBTravassosB, et al. Effects of pitch spatial references on players’ positioning and physical performances during football small-sided games. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 741–747.
41.
SantosSCoutinhoDGonçalvesB, et al. Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior in soccer. Res Q Exerc Sport2018; 89: 11–24.
42.
ClementeFMSequeirosJBCorreiaA, et al. How dots behave in two different pitch sizes? Analysis of tactical behavior based on position data in two soccer field sizes. RICYDE2018; 14: 16–28.
43.
GonçalvesBFolgadoHCoutinhoD, et al. Changes in effective playing space when considering sub-groups of 3 to 10 players in professional soccer matches. J Hum Kinet2018; 62: 145–155.
44.
TakiTHasegawaJ. Visualization of dominant region in team games and its application to teamwork analysis. In: Proceedings computer graphics international, Geneva, 19–24 June 2000, pp.227–235. New York: IEEE.
45.
OkiharaKKanAShiokawaM, et al. Compactness as a strategy in a soccer match in relation to a change in offence and defense [Communications to the fifth world congress on science and football]. J Sports Sci2004; 22: 515.
46.
FujimuraASugiharaK. Geometric analysis and quantitative evaluation of sport teamwork. Syst Comput Jpn2005; 36: 49–58.
47.
PassosPAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Interpersonal dynamics in sport: the role of artificial neural networks and 3-D analysis. Behav Res Methods2006; 38: 683–691.
48.
PassosPAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Information-governing dynamics of attacker–defender interactions in youth rugby union. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 1421–1429.
49.
YueZBroichHSeifrizF, et al. Mathematical analysis of a soccer game. Part I: individual and collective behaviors. Stud Appl Math2008; 121: 223–243.
50.
PassosPAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Interpersonal pattern dynamics and adaptive behavior in multiagent neurobiological systems: conceptual model and data. J Mot Behav2009; 41: 445–459.
51.
LamesMErtmerJWalterFL. Oscillations in football – order and disorder in spatial interactions between the two teams. Int J Sport Psychol2010; 41: 85.
52.
BourboussonJSèveCMcGarryT. Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: part 1. Intra- and inter-couplings among player dyads. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 339–347.
53.
BourboussonJSèveCMcGarryT. Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: part 2. The interaction between the two teams. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 349–358.
54.
DuarteRAraújoDFernandesO, et al. Capturing complex human behaviors in representative sports contexts with a single camera. Medicina (Mex)2010; 46: 408.
55.
MaalejLBattikhTJabriI. Basketball game systems identification by real time video processing. IETE J Res2011; 57: 491.
56.
TravassosBAraújoDVilarL, et al. Interpersonal coordination and ball dynamics in futsal (indoor football). Hum Mov Sci2011; 30: 1245–1259.
57.
TravassosBAraújoDDuarteR, et al. Spatiotemporal coordination patterns in futsal (indoor football) are guided by informational game constraints. Hum Mov Sci2012; 31: 932–945.
58.
FonsecaSMilhoJPassosP, et al. Approximate entropy normalized measures for analyzing social neurobiological systems. J Mot Behav2012; 44: 179–183.
59.
FonsecaSMilhoJTravassosB, et al. Measuring spatial interaction behavior in team sports using superimposed Voronoi diagrams. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 179–189.
60.
DuarteRAraújoDFreireL, et al. Intra- and inter-group coordination patterns reveal collective behaviors of football players near the scoring zone. Hum Mov Sci2012; 31: 1639–1651.
61.
DuarteRAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Interpersonal coordination tendencies shape 1-vs-1 sub-phase performance outcomes in youth soccer. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 871–877.
62.
WallaceJLNortonKI. Evolution of World Cup soccer final games 1966–2010: game structure, speed and play patterns. J Sci Med Sport2014; 17: 223–228.
63.
MouraFAMartinsLEBAnidoRDO, et al. Quantitative analysis of Brazilian football players’ organization on the pitch. Sports Biomech2012; 11: 85–96.
64.
EstevesPTAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Interpersonal dynamics and relative positioning to scoring target of performers in 1 vs. 1 sub-phases of team sports. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1285–1293.
65.
BartlettRButtonCRobinsM, et al. Analysing team coordination patterns from player movement trajectories in soccer: methodological considerations. Int J Perform Anal Sport2012; 12: 398–424.
66.
DuarteRAraújoDFolgadoH, et al. Capturing complex, non-linear team behaviours during competitive football performance. J Syst Sci Complex2013; 26: 62–72.
67.
DuarteRAraújoDCorreiaV, et al. Competing together: assessing the dynamics of team–team and player–team synchrony in professional association football. Hum Mov Sci2013; 32: 555–566.
68.
ClementeMFCouceiroSMMartinsFML, et al. Measuring Collective Behaviour in Football Teams: inspecting the impact of each half of the match on ball possession. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013; 13: 678–689.
69.
ClementeFMCouceiroMSMartinsFML, et al. An online tactical metrics applied to football game. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol2013; 5: 1700–1719.
70.
MouraFAMartinsLEBAnidoRO, et al. A spectral analysis of team dynamics and tactics in Brazilian football. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 1568–1577.
71.
VilarLAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Science of winning soccer: emergent pattern-forming dynamics in association football. J Syst Sci Complex2013; 26: 73–84.
72.
UedaFMasaakiHHiroyukiH. The causal relationship between dominant region and offense– defense performance – focusing on the time of ball acquisition. Football Sci2014; 11: 1–17.
73.
FolgadoHLemminkKAPMFrenckenW, et al. Length, width and centroid distance as measures of teams tactical performance in youth football. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 14: S487–S492.
74.
ClementeFMSantos CouceiroMLourenço MartinsFM, et al. Intelligent systems for analyzing soccer games: the weighted centroid: Sistemas Inteligentes para el análisis de fútbol: centroide ponderado. Ing E Investig2014; 34: 70–75.
75.
VilarLAraújoDDavidsK, et al. Interpersonal coordination tendencies supporting the creation/prevention of goal scoring opportunities in futsal. Eur J Sport Sci2014; 14: 28–35.
76.
EstevesPTAraújoDVilarL, et al. Angular relationships regulate coordination tendencies of performers in attacker–defender dyads in team sports. Hum Mov Sci2015; 40: 264–272.
77.
LopesAFonsecaSLeserR, et al. Using Voronoi diagrams to describe tactical behaviour in invasive team sports: an application in basketball. Cuad Psicol Deporte2015; 15: 123–130.
78.
ClementeFMCouceiroMSMartinsFML, et al. Soccer team’s tactical behaviour: measuring territorial domain. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology2015; 229: 58–66.
79.
MouraFAvan EmmerikREASantanaJE, et al. Coordination analysis of players’ distribution in football using cross-correlation and vector coding techniques. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 2224–2232.
80.
EstevesPTSilvaPVilarL, et al. Space occupation near the basket shapes collective behaviours in youth basketball. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1557–1563.
81.
ShafizadehMDavidsKCorreiaV, et al. Informational constraints on interceptive actions of elite football goalkeepers in 1v1 dyads during competitive performance. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 1596–1601.
82.
Palucci VieiraLHAquinoRMouraFA, et al. Team dynamics, running, and skill-related performances of Brazilian U11 to professional soccer players during official matches. J Strength Cond Res2019; 33; 2202–2216.
83.
MetuliniRManiseraMZuccolottoP. Modelling the dynamic pattern of surface area in basketball and its effects on team performance. J Quant Anal Sports2018; 14: 117–130.
84.
FrenckenWKL. Team kinematics of small-sided soccer games: a systematic approach. In: ReillyTKorkusuzF (eds) Science and football VI. Abingdon: Routledge; Taylor & Francis, 2009, pp.161–166.
85.
FrenckenWLemminkKDellemanN, et al. Oscillations of centroid position and surface area of soccer teams in small-sided games. Eur J Sport Sci2011; 11: 215–223.
86.
FrenckenWVan Der PlaatsJVisscherC, et al. Size matters: pitch dimensions constrain interactive team behaviour in soccer. J Syst Sci Complex2013; 26: 85–93.
87.
LeserRMoserBHochT, et al. Expert-oriented modelling of a 1vs1-situation in football. Int J Perform Anal Sport2015; 15: 949–966.
88.
GrehaigneJ-FBouthierDDavidB. Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer. J Sports Sci1997; 15: 137–149.
89.
PonsEGarcía-CalvoTRestaR, et al. A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: agreement between systems. PLoS ONE2019; 14: e0220729.
90.
CastellanoJA′lvarez-PastorDBradleyPS. Evaluation of research using computerised tracking systems (Amisco and ProZone) to analyse physical performance in elite soccer: a systematic review. Sports Med2014; 44: 701–712.
91.
Bastida-CastilloAGómez-CarmonaCDe la Cruz-SánchezE, et al. Accuracy and inter-unit reliability of ultra-wide-band tracking system in indoor exercise. Appl Sci2019; 9: 939.
92.
LinkeDLinkDLamesM. Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions. PLoS ONE2018; 13: e0199519.
93.
HennessyLJeffreysI. The current use of GPS, its potential, and limitations in soccer. Strength Cond J2018; 40: 83–94.
94.
OgrisGLeserRHorsakB, et al. Accuracy of the LPM tracking system considering dynamic position changes. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1503–1511.
95.
Bastida-CastilloAGómez-CarmonaCDDe La Cruz SánchezE, et al. Comparing accuracy between global positioning systems and ultra-wideband-based position tracking systems used for tactical analyses in soccer. Eur J Sport Sci2019; 19: 1157–1165.
96.
HauslerJHalakiMOrrR. Application of global positioning system and microsensor technology in competitive rugby league match-play: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2016; 46: 559–588.
97.
LeserRBacaAOgrisG. Local positioning systems in (game) sports. Sensors2011; 11: 9778–9797.
