The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a newly developed pedal system (JA:Ped3) for measuring three-dimensional pedal forces in laboratory conditions in cycling. Three-dimensional force measurements were obtained using 12 strain gauges in each pedal, and the pedal angle was measured with a rotary potentiometer mounted on the pedal axle. The pedal forces were validated in a static condition by comparing a range of known forces and in dynamic conditions using the JA:Ped3 with the data collected simultaneously by two commercially available systems, SRM Powermeter and PowerForce. An incremental cycling test was performed with seven elite cyclists. In the static measurements, JA:Ped3 showed an average deviation of <2% and the maximum absolute error did not exceed 4.2 N. In the dynamic measurements, JA:Ped3-calculated pedal torque and power output yielded similar values to the corresponding data from the SRM Powermeter and showed an average deviation of <3%. Using the JA:Ped3 in a laboratory setting for testing, elite cyclists revealed plausible results. The pedal is lightweight and data transmission could be implemented to offer a device for laboratory and field measurements. This pedal would be specifically helpful for cyclists, coaches, therapists and scientists.
GardnerASStephensSMartinDT. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004; 36: 1252–1258.
2.
JonesSLPPassfieldL. The dynamic calibration of bicycle power measuring cranks. In: HaakeS (ed.) The engineering of sport. Oxford: Balkema Publishers, 1998, pp. 265–274.
3.
StapelfeldtBMornieuxGOberheimR. Development and evaluation of a new bicycle instrument for measurements of pedal forces and power output in cycling. Int J Sports Med2007; 28: 326–332.
4.
DorelSCouturierAHugF. Influence of different racing positions on mechanical and electromyographic patterns during pedalling. Scand J Med Sci Sports2009; 19: 44–54.
5.
DorelSDrouetJMCouturierA. Changes of pedaling technique and muscle coordination during an exhaustive exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41: 1277–1286.
BiniRRDiefenthaelerFMotaCB. Fatigue effects on the coordinative pattern during cycling: kinetics and kinematics evaluation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2010; 20: 102–107.
9.
ChapmanAVicenzinoBBlanchP. Do differences in muscle recruitment between novice and elite cyclists reflect different movement patterns or less skilled muscle recruitment?J Sci Med Sport2009; 12: 31–34.
10.
BiniRRCarpesFPDiefenthaelerF. Physiological and electromyographic responses during 40-km cycling time trial: relationship to muscle coordination and performance. J Sci Med Sport2008; 11: 363–370.
11.
CandottiCTLossJFBagatiniD. Cocontraction and economy of triathletes and cyclists at different cadences during cycling motion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2009; 19: 915–921.
12.
BiniRRHumePA. Bilateral asymmetry assessment in cycling using commercial instrumented crank system and instrumented pedals. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2014; 9: 876–881.
13.
DalyDJCavanaghPR. Asymmetry in bicycle ergometer pedalling. Med Sci Sports1976; 8: 204–208.
14.
HuntMASandersonDJMoffetH. Biomechanical changes elicited by an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency during steady rate cycling. Clin Biomech2003; 18: 393–400.
15.
HuntMASandersonDJMoffetH. Interlimb asymmetry in persons with and without an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency during stationary cycling. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 1475–1478.
16.
KunstlingerULudwigHGStegemannJ. Force kinetics and oxygen consumption during bicycle ergometer work in racing cyclists and reference-group. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol1985; 54: 58–61.
17.
SargeantAJDaviesCT. Forces applied to cranks of a bicycle ergometer during one- and two-leg cycling. J Appl Physiol1977; 42: 514–518.
18.
BrookeJDHoareJRosenrotP. Computerized system for measurement of force exerted within each pedal revolution during cycling. Physiol Behav1981; 26: 139–143.
19.
BiniRHumePACroftJ. Pedal force effectiveness in cycling: a review of constraints and training effects. J Sci Cycling2013; 2: 11–24.
20.
BoydTHullMLWoottenD. An improved accuracy six-load component pedal dynamometer for cycling. J Biomech1996; 29: 1105–1110.
21.
DavisRRHullML. Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling: II. Analysis and results. J Biomech1981; 14: 857–872.
22.
HullMLDavisRR. Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling: I. Instrumentation. J Biomech1981; 14: 843–856.
23.
NewmillerJHullMLZajacFE. A mechanically decoupled two force component bicycle pedal dynamometer. J Biomech1988; 21: 375–386.
24.
ÁlvarezGVinyolasJ. A new bicycle pedal design for on-road measurements of cycling forces. J Appl Biomech1996; 12: 130–142.
25.
DorelSDrouetJMHugF. New instrumented pedals to quantify 2D forces at the shoe-pedal interface in ecological conditions: preliminary study in elite track cyclists. Comput Method Biomec2008; 11: 89–90.
26.
RoweTHullMLWangEL. A pedal dynamometer for off-road bicycling. J Biomech Eng1998; 120: 160–164.
27.
MornieuxGZameziatiKMutterE. A cycle ergometer mounted on a standard force platform for three-dimensional pedal forces measurement during cycling. J Biomech2006; 39: 1296–1303.
28.
NeptuneRRHerzogW. Adaptation of muscle coordination to altered task mechanics during steady-state cycling. J Biomech2000; 33: 165–172.
29.
RossatoMBiniRRCarpesFP. Cadence and workload effects on pedaling technique of well-trained cyclists. Int J Sports Med2008; 29: 746–752.
30.
RubyPHullML. Response of intersegmental knee loads to foot/pedal platform degrees of freedom in cycling. J Biomech1993; 26: 1327–1340.
StoneCHullML. The effect of rider weight on rider-induced loads during common cycling situations. J Biomech1995; 28: 365–375.
33.
WhitesideDChinAMiddletonK. The validation of a three-dimensional ball rotation model. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology2013; 227: 49–56.
34.
LukesRHartJHaakeS. An analytical model for track cycling. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology2012; 226: 143–151.
35.
AbbissCRQuodMJLevinG. Accuracy of the Velotron ergometer and SRM power meter. Int J Sports Med2009; 30: 107–112.
36.
BrokerJPGregorRJ. A dual piezoelectric element force pedal for kinetic analysis of cycling. Int J Sports Biomech1990; 6: 394–403.
SandersonDJBlackA. The effect of prolonged cycling on pedal forces. J Sports Sci2003; 21: 191–199.
39.
SandersonDJHennigEMBlackAH. The influence of cadence and power output on force application and in-shoe pressure distribution during cycling by competitive and recreational cyclists. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 173–181.
40.
BiniRRDiefenthaelerF. Kinetics and kinematics analysis of incremental cycling to exhaustion. Sports Biomech2010; 9: 223–235.
41.
BiniRHumePACroftJL. Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance. Sports Med2011; 41: 463–476.
42.
CandottiCTRibeiroJSoaresDP. Effective force and economy of triathletes and cyclists. Sports Biomech2007; 6: 31–43.
