Adopting componential and appraisal approaches to emotion, this commentary highlights how Moors' goal-directed theory allows a deep analysis of the role of emotion in information-seeking decisions. We illustrate how (i) the opportunity to gain information can signal discrepancies with multiple goals, which are reduced by seeking or avoiding information, (ii) goalrelated appraisals and goal satisfaction may partly account for the rewarding properties of information, (iii) practical rationality can explain seemingly irrational information-seeking behaviors, and (iv) biased goal priorization and appraisal biases could lead to maladaptive information-seeking. We suggest that appraisal and goal-directed theories may complement current theoretical frameworks of information-seeking by providing a mechanistic approach to understanding how the evaluation and selection of goals, behavioral strategies, and actions influence information-seeking.
Bromberg-MartinE. S.MonosovI. E. (2020). Neural circuitry of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.006
2.
BuabangE. K.KösterM.HogarthL.MoorsA. (2025). Critical review of the habit theory in substance use disorder and application of Moors’ goal-directed theory. Current Addiction Reports, 12(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-025-00651-w
3.
CharpentierC. J.Bromberg-MartinE. S.SharotT. (2018). Valuation of knowledge and ignorance in mesolimbic reward circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(31), E7255–E7264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800547115
DukesD.AbramsK.AdolphsR.AhmedM. E.BeattyA.BerridgeK. C.BroomhallS.BroschT.CamposJ. J.ClayZ.ClémentF.CunninghamW. A.DamasioA.DamasioH.D’ArmsJ.DavidsonJ. W.de GelderB.DeonnaJ.de SousaR.SanderD. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8
6.
ErdemliA.AudrinC.SanderD. (2025). An integrative appraisal model of epistemic curiosity. Affective Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00328-7
7.
GolmanR.LoewensteinG. (2018). Information gaps: A theory of preferences regarding the presence and absence of information. Decision, 5(3), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000068
8.
KobayashiK.RavaioliS.BaranèsA.WoodfordM.GottliebJ. (2019). Diverse motives for human curiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(6), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0589-3
9.
MoorsA. (2022). Demystifying emotions: A typology of theories in psychology and philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
10.
MoorsA.BoddezY.De HouwerJ. (2017). The power of goal-directed processes in the causation of emotional and other actions. Emotion Review, 9(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669595
11.
MoorsA.Van de CruysS.PourtoisG. (2021). Comparison of the determinants for positive and negative affect proposed by appraisal theories, goal-directed theories, and predictive processing theories. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.015
12.
MurayamaK. (2022). A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: An integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic–extrinsic rewards. Psychological Review, 129(1), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000349
13.
PennycookG.EpsteinZ.MoslehM.ArecharA. A.EcklesD.RandD. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
14.
SanderD. (2025). Theories of emotion for human affective neuroscience. In ArmonyJ.VuilleumierP. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 7–32). Cambridge University Press.
15.
ScarantinoA. (2024). Motivational theories of emotions in philosophy and affective science. In A. Scarantino (Ed.), Emotion theory: The Routledge comprehensive guide(1st ed., pp. 429–466). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315559940-23
StussiY. (2025). Affective and computational determinants of threat extinction biases. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 192, Article 104804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2025.104804
18.
StussiY.DukesD.SanderD. (2024). The added value of affective processes for models of human cognition and learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 47, Article e165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000207
19.
TamirM. (2021). Effortful emotion regulation as a unique form of cybernetic control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(1), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620922199
20.
TurnerG.FergusonA. M.KatiyarT.PalminteriS.OrbenA. (2025). Old strategies, new environments: Reinforcement learning on social media. Biological Psychiatry, 97(10), 989–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.012
21.
Vivanco CarlevariA.OosterwijkSvan KleefG. A. (2025). Why do people engage with the suffering of strangers? Exploring epistemic, eudaimonic, social, and affective motives. Cognition and Emotion, 39(3), 614–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2385691
22.
WuenschL.StussiY.VernedeT.MurrayR. J.SanderD.PéronJ.PoolE. R. (2025). Differential influence of habit components on compulsive and problematic reward-seeking behaviors. PLoS Mental Health, 2(5), Article e0000323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000323
