Agnes Moors’ claim that the processes underlying emotional behavior and those driving non-emotional instrumental behavior are predominantly goal-directed leads her to the eliminativist conclusion that there is no solid mechanistic distinction between emotional and non-emotional episodes—and, thus, that emotions do not qualify as scientifically fruitful concepts. Here, I introduce a distinction between two types of goal-directed processes and discuss the sense of value that I consider relevant to emotional goals. On that basis, I reexamine whether the path to eliminativism is actually unescapable.
Feher da SilvaC.LombardiG.EdelsonM.HareT. A. (2023). Rethinking model-based and model-free influences on mental effort and striatal prediction errors. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(6), 956–969. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01573-1
5.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
6.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
7.
MillerK. J.LudvigE. A.PezzuloG.ShenhavA. (2018). Realigning models of habitual and goal-directed decision-making. In MorrisR.BornsteinA.ShenhavA. (Eds.), Goal-directed decision making (pp. 407–428). Academic Press.
8.
MoorsA. (2022). Demystifying emotions: A typology of theories in psychology and philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
9.
PauliW. M.GentileG.ColletteS.TyszkaJ. M.O’DohertyJ. P. (2019). Evidence for model-based encoding of Pavlovian contingencies in the human brain. Nature Communications, 10(1),Article 1099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08922-7
10.
ScarantinoA. (2014). The motivational theory of emotions. In D’ArmsJ.JacobsonD. (Eds.), Moral psychology and human agency: Philosophical essays on the science of ethics (pp. 156–185). Oxford University Press.
11.
ShenhavA. (2024). The affective gradient hypothesis: An affect-centered account of motivated behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(12), 1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.08.003
