GasperK. (2018). Utilizing neutral affective states in research: Theory, assessment, and recommendations. Emotion Review, 10, 255–266. https://doi.org:10.1177/1754073918765660
3.
KrumhuberE. G.SkoraL.KüsterD.FouL. (2017). A review of dynamic datasets for facial expression research. Emotion Review, 9, 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916670022
4.
MacCannC.MatthewsG.RobertsR. R. (2012). Casting the first stone of validity standards: A less critical perspective of the MSCEIT. Emotion Review, 4, 409–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445817
5.
MatsumotoD.HwangH. C. (2017). Methodological issues regarding cross-cultural studies of judgments of facial expressions. Emotion Review, 9, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916679008
6.
MaulA. (2012a). The validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) as a measure of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review, 4, 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445811
7.
MaulA. (2012b). Higher standards of validity evidence are needed in the measurement of emotional intelligence. Emotion Review, 4, 411–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912446357
8.
MayerJ. D.SaloveyP.CarusoD. R. (2012). The validity of the MSCEIT: Additional analyses and evidence. Emotion Review, 4, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445815
9.
MillerC.SacchetM.GotlibI. (2020). Support vector machines and affective science. Emotion Review, 12, 297–308.
10.
MinersC. T. H.CôtéS.LievensF. (2018). Assessing the validity of emotional intelligence measures. Emotion Review, 10, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917693688
11.
SiedleckaE.DensonT. F. (2019). Experimental methods for inducing basic emotions: A qualitative review. Emotion Review, 11, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917749016
12.
WitkowerZ.TracyJ. L. (2019). Bodily communication of emotion: Evidence for extrafacial behavioral expressions and available coding systems. Emotion Review, 11, 184–193. https://doi.org:10.1177/1754073917749880
