It is clear a relational approach to the study of empathy is gaining traction across multiple disciplines. Both commentaries on “A Relational Framework for Integrating the Study of Empathy in Children and Adults” underscored the need to expand the relational framework of empathy to incorporate the broader social and cultural context in which children and adults live. In the present reply we outline some specific ways that culture can inform the study of empathy in interpersonal contexts. We focus on how culture and context shape the meaning of empathy and its expression and highlight how a within-culture approach to the study of empathy will advance our understanding of this nebulous construct.
AtkinsD.UskulA. K.CooperN. R. (2016). Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain. Emotion, 16, 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000162
2.
BornsteinM. H.CheahC. S. L. (2006). The place of “culture and parenting” in the ecological contextual perspective on developmental science. In RubinK. H.ChungO. B. (Eds.), Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent–child relations: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3.
CarloG.RoeschS. C.KnightG. P.KollerS. H. (2001). Between- or within-culture variation?: Culture group as a moderator of the relations between individual differences and resource allocation preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00094-6
4.
GoetzJ.PengK. (2018). Sympathy and responses to suffering: Similarity and variation in China and the United States. Emotion, 19, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000443
5.
HalpernJ. (2001). From detached concern to empathy: Humanizing medical practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
HollanD. (2020). Comment: The “relational approach” to empathy in ethnographic perspective. Emotion Review, 12, 291–292.
7.
HollanD.ThroopC. J. (2011). The anthropology of empathy: Introduction. In HollanD. W.ThroopC. J. (Eds.), The anthropology of empathy: Experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies (pp. 1–25). Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
8.
KupetzM. (2014). Empathy displays as interactional achievements—Multimodal and sequential aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006
9.
KupetzM. (2019). Embodying empathy in everyday and institutional settings: On the negotiation of resources, rights and responsibilities in comforting actions. In ReberE.GerhardtC. (Eds.), Embodied activities in face-to-face and mediated settings: Social encounters in time and space (pp. 329–367). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
KupetzM. (2020). Comment on “A Relational Framework for Integrating the Study of Empathy in Children and Adults”: A conversation analytic perspective. Emotion Review, 12, 293–294.
11.
LougheedJ. P.MainA.HelmJ. L. (2020). Mother–adolescent emotion dynamics during conflicts: Associations with perspective taking. Journal of Family Psychology. Advance online publication.
12.
MainA. (2019). Parenting and prosocial/moral development in Asian and Asian immigrants to the U.S. In LaibleD. J.CarloG.WalkerL. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
MainA.WalleE. A.KhoC.HalpernJ. (2017). The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective. Emotion Review, 9, 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440
14.
MainA.ZhouQ.LiewJ.LeeC. (2017). Prosocial tendencies in Chinese American children from immigrant families: Associations with sociodemographic characteristics and psychosocial adjustment. Social Development, 26, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12182
TrommsdorffG.FriedlmeierW.MayerB. (2007). Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407076441
17.
Van LissaC. J.HawkS. T.de WiedM.KootH. M.van LierP.MeeusW. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of affective and cognitive empathy within and between adolescents and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035050
