In this comment, I indicate several challenges and opportunities—out of the many—for an integrated science–humanities approach to emotions, from the perspective of a historian of the modern sciences of emotions.
BinetH.CourtierJ. (1896). Influence de la vie émotionnelle sur le coeur, la respiration et la circulation capillaire. L’année psychologique, 3, 65–126.
2.
CooleD.FrostS. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
DrorO. E. (2004). “Voodoo death”: Fantasy, excitement, and the untenable boundaries of biomedical science. In JohnstonR. D. (Ed.), The politics of healing: Essays in the twentieth-century history of North American alternative medicine (pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
DrorO. E. (2011). De-medicalizing the medical humanities. The European Legacy, 16, 317–326.
5.
DrorO. E. (2016). Cold-War “super-pleasure”: Insatiability, self-stimulation and the post-war brain. In DrorO. E.HitzerB.LaukötterA.León-SanzP. (Eds.), History of science and the emotions (pp. 227–249). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Fausto-SterlingA. (2005). The bare bones of sex: Part 1—Sex and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1491–1517.
7.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
8.
MossoA. (1886). La peur: Étude psycho-physiologique. Paris, France: Alcan.
9.
SimpsonD. (1992). Raymond Williams: Feeling for structures, voicing “history.”Social Text, 30, 9–26.
