Cultural variants may spread by being more appealing, more memorable, or less offensive than other cultural variants. Empirical studies suggest that such “emotional selection” is a force to be reckoned with in cultural evolution. We present a research paradigm that is suitable for the study of emotional selection. It guides empirical research by directing attention to the circumstances under which emotions influence the likelihood that an individual will influence another individual to acquire a cultural variant. We present a modeling framework to translate such knowledge into specific and testable predictions of population-level change. A set of already analyzed basic cases can serve as a toolbox.
AcerbiA.van LeeuwenE. J.HaunD. B.TennieC. (2016). Conformity cannot be identified based on population-level signatures. Scientific Reports, 6. http://doi.org/10.1038/srep36068
2.
ArrowsmithD. K.PlaceC. M. (1990). An introduction to dynamical systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BergerJ. (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22, 891–893.
4.
BergerJ.MilkmanK. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 192–205.
5.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L.FeldmanM. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
CowndenD.ErikssonK.StrimlingP. (2017). A popular misapplication of evolutionary modeling to the study of human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 421–427.
9.
De BarraM.ErikssonK.StrimlingP. (2014). How feedback biases give ineffective medical treatments a good reputation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3214
10.
EliasN. (2000) The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
11.
ElsterJ. (2015). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EnquistM.GhirlandaS.ErikssonK. (2011). Modelling the evolution and diversity of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366, 412–423.
13.
ErikssonK. (2012). The nonsense math effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 746–749.
14.
ErikssonK.CoultasJ. (2014). Corpses, maggots, poodles and rats: A content bias for disgust in three phases of cultural transmission. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 14, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342107
15.
ErikssonK.CoultasJ.De BarraM. (2016). Cross-cultural differences in emotional selection on transmission of information. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 16, 122–143.
16.
ErikssonK.CowndenD.EhnM.StrimlingP. (2014). “Altruistic” and “antisocial” punishers are one and the same. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1, 1–13. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2469806
17.
ErikssonK.CowndenD.StrimlingP. (2017). Social learning may lead to population level conformity without individual level frequency bias. Scientific Reports, 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17826-9
18.
ErikssonK.EnquistM.GhirlandaS. (2007). Critical points in current theory of conformist social learning. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 67–87.
19.
ErikssonK.StrimlingP. (2015). Group differences in broadness of values may drive dynamics of public opinion on moral issues. Mathematical Social Sciences, 77, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.06.004
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
22.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
23.
HeathC.BellC.SternbergE. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1028–1041.
24.
HeuerF.ReisbergD. (1992). Emotion, arousal, and memory for detail. In ChristiansonS. (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 151–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
LumsdenC. J.WilsonE. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
MitonH.ClaidièreN.MercierH. (2015). Universal cognitive mechanisms explain the cultural success of bloodletting. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 303–312.
27.
NicholsS. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69, 234–255.
28.
PetersK.KashimaY.ClarkA. (2009). Talking about others: Emotionality and the dissemination of social information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 207–222.
29.
PinkerS. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. New York, NY: Penguin.
30.
RichersonP.BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
SandholmW. H. (2009). Evolutionary game theory. In MeyersR. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 3176–3205). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
32.
SchellingT. C. (2006). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
33.
SkyrmsB. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SperberD. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
StrimlingP.De BarraM.ErikssonK. (2018). Asymmetries in punishment propensity may drive the civilizing process. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 148–155.
36.
StrimlingP.EnquistM.ErikssonK. (2009). Repeated learning makes cultural evolution unique. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 13870–13874.
37.
StrimlingP.VartanovaI.JanssonF.ErikssonK. (2019). The connection between moral positions and moral arguments drives opinion change. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 922–930.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
