This case study in the history of “passion” and “emotion” is based on the writings of William James. James is famous for his (1884) theory of emotion. However, like his illustrious colleague, Théodule Ribot, he also recognized the importance of “passion” in psychology. That aspect of James’s work is underappreciated. Ribot explicitly defends the necessity of including “passion” in psychology. James does not go that far. But he does utilize a very similar concept in connection with the term “passion” and there can be little doubt he considered it scientifically legitimate. Consequently, like Ribot, James must be considered an exception to historical accounts of this period which describe a transition from “passion” to “emotion” in which “passion” plays no part.
DixonT. (2003). From passions to emotions: The creation of a psychological secular category. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DixonT. (2012). “Emotion”: The history of a keyword in crisis. Emotion Review, 4, 338–344. doi:10.1177/1754073912445814
10.
EssaryK. (2017). Passions, affections, or emotions? On the ambiguity of 16th-century terminology. Emotion Review, 9, 367–374.
11.
FrevertU. (2014). Emotional lexicons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
FriersonP. R. (2014). Passions and affects. In CohenA. (Ed.), Kant’s lectures on anthropology: A critical guide (pp. 94–113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FrijdaN.MesquitaB.SonnemansJ.van GoozenS. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments, and passions. In StrongmanK. T. (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 187–223). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
14.
GriffithsP. E. (1997). What emotions really are: The problem of psychological categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
KantI. (2006). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (LoudenR. B., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1789)
21.
LeoR. (2016). Affective physics: Affectus in Spinoza’s Ethica. In CummingsB.SierhuisF. (Eds.), Passions and subjectivity in early modern culture (pp. 33–51). London, UK: Routledge.
NicolasS.CharvillatA. (2001). Introducing psychology as an academic discipline in France: Théodule Ribot and the College de France (1888–1901). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 37(2), 143–164.
24.
NicolasS.MurrayD. J. (1999). Théodule Ribot (1839–1916): Founder of French psychology: A biographical introduction. History of Psychology, 2(4), 277–301.
25.
OkholmD. (2015). Dangerous passions, deadly sins: Learning from the psychology of ancient monks. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
RibotT. (1900). La psicología de los sentimientos (RubioR., Trans.). Madrid, Spain: Fernando Fé, Victoriano Suárez.Ribot, T. (1903). Psychologie der Gefühle. Altenburg, Germany: O. Bonde.
RussellJ. A. (2012). Introduction to special section: On defining emotion. Emotion Review, 4, 337.
39.
RussellJ. A.BarrettL. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.
40.
SouthworthJ. (2014). William James’ theory of emotion (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. (Accession No. 2315).
41.
VallerandR. J. (2015). The psychology of passion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
WassmannC. (2005). The science of emotion: Studying emotions in Germany, France, and the United States, 1860–1920 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (Accession No. 3168411).
43.
WassmannC. (2009). Physiological optics, cognition and emotion: A novel look at the early work of Wilhelm Wundt. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64(2), 213–249.
44.
WassmannC. (2014). “Picturesque incisiveness”: Explaining the celebrity of James theory of emotion. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 166–188.
