Countless studies have reported that individuals detect threatening/angry faces faster than happy/neutral faces. Two classic views have been used to explain this phenomenon—that negative valence drives the effect, or conversely, that low-level perceptual characteristics of the stimuli are responsible for their rapid detection. In the current review, I question whether dichotomous perspectives are the most parsimonious way to explain a large and inconsistent literature. Further, I argue that nondichotomous, multicomponent accounts for the detection of emotionally valenced stimuli might help take us beyond traditional approaches to visual detection research, and I suggest various ways in which future research can use these newer approaches to more effectively elucidate the mechanisms underlying the rapid detection of emotionally valenced stimuli.
AndersonB. A.LaurentP A.YantisS. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108
, 10367–10371.
2.
AndersonB. A.YantisS. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6–9.
3.
Bar-HaimY.LamyD.PergaminL.Bakersman-KranenburgM. J.van IjzendoornM. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
4.
BeaverJ. D.MoggK.BradleyB. P. (2005). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli and modulation of visuospatial attention. Emotion, 5, 67–79.
5.
BeckerD. V.AndersonU. S.MortensenC. R.NeufeldS. L.NeelR. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 637–659.
6.
BeckerS. I.HorstmannG.RemingtonR. W. (2011). Perceptual grouping, not emotion, accounts for search asymmetries with schematic faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1739–1757.
7.
BlanchetteI. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1484–1504.
8.
BroschT.SharmaD. (2005). The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: A comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Emotion, 5, 360–364.
9.
ByrneA.EysenckM. (1995). Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 549–562.
10.
CalvoM. G.AveroP.LundqvistD. (2006). Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 785–811.
11.
CalvoM. G.EstevesF. (2005). Detection of emotional faces: Low perceptual threshold and wide attentional span. Visual Cognition, 12, 13–27.
12.
CalvoM. G.MarreroH. (2009). Visual search of emotional faces: The role of affective content and featural distinctiveness. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 782–806.
13.
CaveK. R.BattyM. J. (2006). From searching for features to searching for threat: Drawing the boundary between preattentive and attentive vision. Visual Cognition, 14, 629–646.
14.
ChouchourelouA.MatsukaT.HarberK.ShiffrarM. (2006). The visual analysis of emotional actions. Social Neuroscience, 1, 63–74.
15.
CoelhoC. M.CloeteS.WallisG. (2011). The face-in-the-crowd effect: When angry faces are just cross(es). Journal of Vision, 10, 1–14.
16.
EastwoodJ. D.SmilekD. (2005). Functional consequences of perceiving facial expressions of emotion without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 565–584.
17.
EastwoodJ. D.SmilekD.MerikleP. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1004–1013.
18.
EastwoodJ. D.SmilekD.MerikleP. M. (2003). Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 352–358.
19.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press.
20.
EstevesF. (1999). Attentional bias to emotional facial expressions. European Review of Applied Psychology, 49, 91–97.
21.
FenskeM. J.EastwoodJ. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327–343.
22.
FlyktA. (2005). Visual search with biological threat stimuli: Accuracy, reaction times, and heart rate changes. Emotion, 5, 349–353.
23.
FlyktA. (2006). Preparedness for action: Responding to the snake in the grass. The American Journal of Psychology, 119, 29–43.
24.
ForbesS. J.PurkisH. M.LippO. V. (2011). Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 794–804.
25.
FoxE.LesterV.RussoR.BowlesR.PichlerA.DuttonK. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61–92.
26.
FoxE.RussoR.BowlesR.DuttonK. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.
27.
FoxE.RussoR.DuttonK. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 355–379.
28.
FrischenA.EastwoodJ. D.SmilekD. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662–676.
29.
GaoX.LoBueV.HarveyT.IrvingJ. (2015). The effect of spatial frequency information and perceptual similarity in threat detection. Manuscript under review.
30.
GerritsenC.FrischenA.BlakeA.SmilekD.EastwoodJ. D. (2008). Visual search is not blind to emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1047–1059.
31.
Gilboa-SchechtmanE.FoaE. B.AmirN. (1999). Attentional biases for facial expressions in social phobia: The face-in-the-crowd paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 305–318.
32.
HansenC. H.HansenR. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.
33.
HayakawaS.KawaiN.MasatakaN. (2011). The influence of color on snake detection in visual search in human children. Scientific Reports, 1, 1–4.
34.
HorstmannG. (2009). Visual search for schematic affective faces: Stability and variability of search slopes with different instances. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 355–379.
35.
HorstmannG.BaulandA. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. Emotion, 6, 193–207.
36.
HorstmannG.BorgstedtK.HeumannM. (2006). Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. Emotion, 6, 28–39.
37.
HorstmannG.LippO. V.BeckerS. I. (2012). On toothy grins and angry snarls—Open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces. Journal of Vision, 12, 1–15.
38.
HorstmannG.ScharlauI.AnsorgeU. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1067–1073.
39.
LarsonC. L.AronoffJ.StearnsJ. J. (2007). The shape of threat: Simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. Emotion, 7, 526–534.
40.
LippO. V. (2006). Of snakes and flowers: Does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance?Emotion, 6, 296–308.
41.
LippO. V.DerakshanN. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5, 365–369.
42.
LippO. V.DerakshanN.WatersA. M.LogiesS. (2004). Snakes and cats in the flower bed: Fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals. Emotion, 4, 233–250.
43.
LippO. V.WatersA. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192–200.
44.
LoBueV. (2009). More than just a face in the crowd: Detection of emotional facial expressions in young children and adults. Developmental Science, 12, 305–313.
45.
LoBueV. (2010). And along came a spider: Superior detection of spiders in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 59–66.
46.
LoBueV. (2013). What are we so afraid of? How early attention shapes our most common fears. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 38–42.
47.
LoBueV. (2014). Deconstructing the snake: The relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. Emotion, 14, 701–711.
48.
LoBueV.DeLoacheJ. S. (2008). Detecting the snake in the grass: Attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychological Science, 19, 284–289.
49.
LoBueV.DeLoacheJ. S. (2009). Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science, 13, 221–228.
50.
LoBueV.DeLoacheJ. S. (2011). What’s so special about slithering serpents? Children and adults rapidly detect snakes based on their simple features. Visual Cognition, 19, 129–143.
51.
LoBueV.LarsonC. L. (2010). What makes angry faces look so…angry? Examining visual attention to the shape of threat in children and adults. Visual Cognition, 18, 1165–1178.
52.
LoBueV.MatthewsK.HarveyT.StarkS. L. (2014). What accounts for the rapid detection of threat? Evidence for an advantage in perceptual and behavioral responding from eye movements. Emotion, 14, 816–823.
53.
LoBueV.RakisonD. (2013). What we fear most: A developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli. Developmental Review, 33, 285–303.
54.
LoBueV.RakisonD.DeLoacheJ. S. (2010). Threat perception across the lifespan: Evidence for multiple converging pathways. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 375–379.
55.
LundqvistD.ÖhmanA. (2005). Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention. Visual Cognition, 12, 51–84.
56.
MasatakaN.ShibasakiM. (2012). Premenstrual enhancement of snake detection in visual search in healthy women. Scientific Reports, 2, 1–4.
57.
MildersM.SahraieA.LoganS.DonnellonN. (2006). Awareness of faces is modulated by their emotional meaning. Emotion, 6(1), 10–17.
58.
ÖhmanA. (2009). Of snakes and faces: An evolutionary perspective on the psychology of fear. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 543–552.
59.
ÖhmanA.DimbergU. (1978). Facial expressions as conditioned stimuli for electrodermal responses: A case of “preparedness”?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1251–1258.
60.
ÖhmanA.FlyktA.EstevesF. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 466–478.
61.
ÖhmanA.LundqvistD.EstevesF. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: An anger superiority effect with schematic faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.
62.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward and evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
63.
PurcellD. G.StewartA. L.SkovR. B. (1996). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception, 25, 1091–1108.
64.
PurkisH. M.LippO. V. (2007). Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: Preferential attention without implicit valence. Emotion, 7, 314–323.
65.
SchuboA.GendollaG.MeineckeC.AbeleA. E. (2006). Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search task paradigm: Are faces special?Emotion, 6, 246–256.
66.
SoaresS. C.EstevesF.LundqvistD.ÖhmanA. (2012). Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 1032–1042.
67.
TipplesJ.AtkinsonA. P.YoungA. W. (2002). The eyebrow frown: A salient social signal. Emotion, 2, 288–296.
68.
TipplesJ.YoungA. W.QuinlanP.BroksP.EllisA. W. (2002). Searching for threat. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1007–1026.
69.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
70.
WilliamsM. A.MossS. A.BradshawJ. L.MattingleyJ. B. (2005). Look at me, I’m smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 12, 29–50.
71.
WolfeJ. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?Psychological Science, 9, 33–39.
