Wood, Kressel, Joshi, and Louie (2014) meta-analyzed studies examining changes in women’s mate preferences as a function of cycle phase, and claimed to find little evidence for shifts, contrary to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales’s (2014a) meta-analysis. This commentary concerns specific speculations Wood et al. made about particular researchers analyzing data multiple ways, capitalizing on chance and thereby inflating the Type I error rate. In so doing, Wood et al. misconstrued a key article explaining the high fertility period, misrepresented studies, and presented no supportive evidence. The corrosive effects of inappropriate research practices on scientific literatures are concerning. So too are unsubstantiated speculations of them.
BairdD. D.McConnaugheyR.WeinbergC. R.MuseyP. I.CollinsD. C.KesnerJ. S.WilcoxA. J. (1995). Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology, 6, 547–550.
2.
GangestadS. W.Garver-ApgarC. E.SimpsonJ. A.CousinsA. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151–163.
3.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preference for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927–933.
4.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (2003). Fluctuating asymmetry, developmental instability, and fitness: Toward model-based interpretation. In PolakM. (Ed.), Developmental instability: Causes and consequences (pp. 62–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.Garver-ApgarC. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2023–2027.
6.
GildersleeveK.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. (2014a). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle?: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259.
7.
GildersleeveK.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. (2014b). Meta-analyses and p-curves support robust cycle shifts in mate preferences: Response to Wood & Carden and Harris, Pashler & Mickes (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1272–1280.
8.
HarrisC. R.PashlerH.MickesL. (2014). Elastic analysis procedures: An incurable (but preventable) problem in the fertility effect literature. A comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton & Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1260–1264.
9.
HummelT.GollischR.WildtG.KobalG. (1991). Changes in olfactory perception during the menstrual cycle. Experientia, 47, 712–715.
JonesB. C. (2014). Comment: Alternatives to Wood et al.’s conclusions. Emotion Review, 6, 254–256.
12.
LarsonC. M.PillsworthC. G.HaseltonM. G. (2012). Ovulatory shifts in women’s attractions to primary partners and other men: Further evidence of the importance of primary partner sexual attractiveness. PLoS ONE, 7, e44456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044456
13.
MoffittC. A. (2003). Steroid hormone modulation of olfactory processing in the context of socio-sexual behaviors in rodents and humans. Brain Research Reviews, 43, 192–206.
14.
PillsworthE. G.HaseltonM. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247–258.
15.
RoneyJ. R.SimmonsZ. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of sexual motivation in natural menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 636–645.
16.
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534–547.
17.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
18.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness?Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.
19.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W.MillerR.ScheydG.KnightJ.FranklinM. (2003). MHC, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668–678.
20.
WilcoxA. J.DuncanD. B.WeinbergC. R.TrussellJ.BairdD. D. (2001). Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: Providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception, 63, 211–215.
21.
WoodW.KresselL.JoshiP. D.LouieB. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229–249.
