Certain emotional processes “bypass the will” and even awareness, whereas others arise due to the deliberative evaluation of objects, states, and events. It is important to differentiate between the automatic versus reflective origins of emotional processes, and sensory versus conceptual bases of diverse negative and positive emotions. A taxonomy of emotions based on different origins is presented. This taxonomy distinguishes between negative and positive automatic versus reflective emotions. The automatic emotions are connected with the (a) homeostatic and (b) hedonistic regulatory mechanisms. The reflective emotions—uniquely human—are described in reference to deliberative processes and appraisals based on two types of conceptual and verbalized evaluative standards: (a) ideal self-standards and (b) general, axiological standards of good and evil.
ArmonyJ.VuilleumierP. (Eds.). (2013). Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BindraD. (1968). Neuropsychological interpretation of the effects of drive and incentive-motivation on general activity and instrumental behavior. Psychological Review, 75, 1–22. doi:10.1037/h0025306
3.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.). (2004). Essays in social neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
CacioppoJ. T.GardnerW. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.191
5.
DamasioA. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.
6.
DavidsonR. J. (1993). Cerebral asymmetry and emotion: Conceptual and methodological conundrums. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 115–138. doi:10.1080/02699939308409180
7.
EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
EpsteinS. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In PervinL. (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
FreudS. (1933). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton.
10.
GazzanigaM. S. (2011). Who’s in charge?: Free will and the science of the brain. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
11.
GołąbA. (1999). Selektywne zapamiętywanie informacji jako wskaźnik postaw moralnych [Memory selectivity as an indicator of moral attitudes]. Warsaw, Poland: IP PAN.
12.
GreenwaldA. G.PratkanisA. R. (1984). The self. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 129–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.108.4.814
14.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.94.3.319
15.
HoffmanM. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Implications for caring and justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ImbirK.JarymowiczM. (2013). The effect of automatic vs. reflective emotions on cognitive control in the Antisaccade Tasks and the Emotional Stroop Test. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44(2), 137–146. doi:10.2478/ppb-2013–0016
17.
ImbirK. (2014). Affective Norms for 1,586 Polish Words (ANPW): Duality of Mind Approach. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0509-4
18.
ImbirK.JarymowiczM.ŻygierewiczJ.KuśR.MichalakM.KruszyńskiM.DurkaP. (2012). Emocje o genezie automatycznej bądź refleksyjnej a potencjały związane z bodźcem (ERP) [Neural correlates of automatic vs. reflective emotions: An ERP pilot study]. Psychologia - Etologia - Genetyka, 26(2), 23–41.
19.
ItoT. A.LarsenJ. T.SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.75.4.887
20.
JarymowiczM. (Ed.). (1993). To know self – To understand others. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
21.
JarymowiczM. (2006). O przejawach faworyzowania swoich wobec obcych i rzekomej nieuchronności zjawiska [On in-group favoritism and alleged inevitability of the phenomenon]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo IP PAN.
22.
JarymowiczM. (2008). Psychologiczne podstawy podmiotowości [Psychological foundations of personal agency]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
23.
JarymowiczM. (2009). Emotions as evaluative processes: From primary affects to appraisals based on deliberative thinking. In BłachnioA.PrzepiórkaA. (Eds.), Closer to emotions (pp. 55–72). Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL.
24.
JarymowiczM.Bar-TalD. (2006). Dominance of fear over hope in the life of individuals and collectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 367–392. doi:10.1002/ejsp.302
25.
JarymowiczM.ImbirK.JasielskaD.WolakT.NaumczykP. (2013). Wzbudzanie emocji specyficznych dla automatycznego vs refleksyjnego systemu wartościowania a odpowiedzi hemodynamiczne mózgu: badanie z wykorzystaniem fMRI [Elicitation of emotions specific for the automatic vs. reflective evaluative systems and the hemodynamic responses of the brain: fMRI effects]. Psychologia - Etologia - Genetyka, 27(2), 7–24.
26.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking. Fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
27.
KahnemanD.FredricksonB. L.SchreiberC. A.RedelmeierD. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.1993.tb00589.x
28.
KaryłowskiJ. (1982). On the two types of altruistic behaviour: Doing good to feel good versus to make others feel good. In DerlegaV.GrzelakJ. (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 397–413). New York, NY: Academic Press.
29.
KernisM. H. (Ed.). (2006). Self-esteem. Issues and answers. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30.
KohlbergL. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In LickonaT. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
31.
KozieleckiJ. (1997). Transgresja i kultura [Transgression and culture]. Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Akademickie ŻAK.
32.
LazarusR. S. (1994). Appraisal: The long and short of it. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. (Eds.), Nature of emotions: Fundamental questions (pp. 208–215). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
LeDouxJ. E. (1998). The emotional brain. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
34.
LeDouxJ. E. (2012). Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron, 73(4), 653–676. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.018
35.
LindquistK. A.WagerT. D.KoberH.Bliss-MoreauE.BarrettL. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 121–143. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000446
36.
MansteadA. S. R.FrijdaN. H.FischerA. H. (Eds.). (2004). Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.98.2.224
38.
MarkusH. R.MoyaP. M. L. (Eds.). (2010). Doing race. 21 essays for the 21st century. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
39.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.
40.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.64.5.723
41.
OatleyK.JenkinsJ. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
PeetersG.CzapińskiJ. (1990). Positive–negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33–60). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
45.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.
46.
PiagetJ. (1980). Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique [The elementary forms of dialectics]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
47.
PinkerS. (2011). The better angels of our nature. Why violence has declined. London, UK: Penguin Books.
48.
PlutchikR. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
49.
ReykowskiJ. (1979). Motywacja, postawy prospołeczne, a osobowość [Motivation, prosocial attitudes, and personality]. Warsaw, Poland: PWN
50.
ReykowskiJ. (1989). Dimensions of development of moral values. In EisenbergN.ReykowskiJ.StaubE. (Eds.), Social and moral values (pp. 23–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
RogersC. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London, UK: Constable.
52.
RollsE. T. (2000). Précis of the brain and emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(2), 177–191. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00432425
53.
RussellJ. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.110.1.145
54.
SanderD.GrafmanJ.ZallaT. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14(4), 303–316. doi:10.1515/REVNEURO.2003.14.4.303
55.
SanderD.SchererK. R. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
SnyderC. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1980). The uniqueness. The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
58.
SzusterA. (2005). W poszukiwaniu źródeł i uwarunkowań ludzkiego altruizmu [Search for the sources and determinants of human altruism]. Warsaw, Poland: IP PAN.
59.
TesserA. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290–299. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_1
60.
WierzbickaA. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WierzbickaA. (2009). Language and metalanguage: Key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1177/1754073908097175
62.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.35.2.151
