Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrett
L.
(2014 ). The conceptual act theory: A précis . Emotion Review , 6 , 292 –297 .
2.
Buss
D.
(2014 ). Comment: Evolutionary criteria for considering an emotion “basic”: Jealousy as an illustration . Emotion Review , 6 , 313 –315 .
3.
Clay-Warner
J.
(2014 ). Comment: Status, power, and emotion . Emotion Review , 6 , 315 –316 .
4.
Gendolla
G.
(2014 ). Comment: Emotions are functional—so…? Emotion Review , 6 , 317 –318 .
5.
LeDoux
J.
(2014 ). Comment: What’s basic about the brain mechanisms of emotion? Emotion Review , 6 , 318 –320 .
6.
Mesquita
B.
(2014 ). Author reply: The “social” is not merely another level of reality . Emotion Review , 6 , 327 –328 .
7.
Mesquita
B.
Boiger
M.
(2014 ). Emotions in context: A sociodynamic model of emotions . Emotion Review , 6 , 298 –302 .
8.
Moors
A.
(2014a ). Flavors of appraisal theories of emotion . Emotion Review , 6 , 303 –307 .
9.
Moors
A.
(2014b ). Author reply: Toward a multilevel mechanistic explanation of complex regularities between environment and emotional components . Emotion Review , 6 , 320 –330 .
10.
Nesse
R. M.
(2014 ). Comment: A general “theory of emotion” is neither necessary nor possible . Emotion Review , 6 , 320 –322 .
11.
Shweder
R. A.
(2014 ). Comment: The tower of appraisals: Trying to make sense of the one big thing . Emotion Review , 6 , 322 –324 .
12.
Tracy
J.
(2014a ). An evolutionary approach to understanding distinct emotions . Emotion Review , 6 , 308 –312 .
13.
Tracy
J.
(2014b ). Author reply: Incompatible conclusions or different levels of analysis? Emotion Review , 6 , 330 –331 .
14.
Zachar
P.
(2014 ). Comment: Five uses of philosophy in scientific theories of emotion . Emotion Review , 6 , 324 –326 .