Strohminger gives a lively and accurate critique of McGinn’s book (2011) but is somewhat inaccurate herself in describing the current theoretical state of the science on disgust. My comment primarily focuses on the issues I have with McGinn’s and Strohminger’s discussions and briefly offers a possible unifying account of the function and meaning of disgust.
ChapmanH. A.KimD. A.SusskindJ. M.AndersonA. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222–1226.
2.
CurtisV. (2013). Don’t look, don’t touch, don’t eat: The science behind revulsion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
FesslerD. M. T.NavarreteC. D. (2005). The effect of age on death disgust: Challenges to terror management perspectives. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 279–296.
4.
FreudS. (1962). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (StracheyJ., Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
HazeS.GozuY.NakamuraS.KohnoY.SawanoK.OhtaH.YamazakiK. (2001). 2- Nonenal newly found in human body-odor tends to increase with aging. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 116, 520–524.
6.
HerzR. (2007). The scent of desire: Discovering our enigmatic sense of smell. New York, NY: William Morrow/HarperCollins.
7.
HerzR. (2012). That’s disgusting: Unraveling the mysteries of repulsion. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Co.
8.
McGinnC. (2011). The meaning of disgust. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
RozinP.HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R. (2008). Disgust. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
RozinP.NemeroffC.HorowitzM.GordonB.VoetW. (1995). The borders of the self: Contamination sensitivity and potency of the body apertures and other body parts. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 318–340.
11.
StrohmingerN. (2014). The meaning of digust: A refutation. Emotion Review, 6, 214–216.