According to legal tradition, the ideal judge is entirely dispassionate. Affective science calls into question the legitimacy of this ideal; further, it suggests that no judge could ever meet this standard, even if it were the correct one. What judges can and should do is to learn to effectively manage—rather than eliminate—emotion. Specifically, an emotion regulation perspective suggests that (a) judicial emotion is best managed by cognitive reappraisal and, often, disclosure; (b) behavioral suppression should be used sparingly; and (c) suppression of emotional experience is rarely helpful. We argue that the dispassionate-judge ideal presents a barrier to achieving the flexibility necessary for adaptive judicial emotion regulation. We suggest a new ideal, that of the emotionally well-regulated judge, and propose several directions for future research to strengthen ties between law and psychology, with particular attention to the study of emotion.
AbramsK.KerenH. (2009). Who’s afraid of law & the emotions?Minnesota Law Review, 94, 1998–2074.
2.
AnleuS. R.MackK. (2005). Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour. Journal of Law & Society, 32, 590–614.
3.
BandesS. (Ed.). (1999). The passions of law. New York, NY: NYU Press.
4.
BandesS. (2009). Repellent crimes and rational deliberation: Emotion and the death penalty. Vermont Law Review, 33, 489–518.
5.
BarrettL. F.GrossJ. J.ConnerT.BenvenutoM. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 713–724.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
7.
BeerJ. S.LombardoM. V. (2007). Insights into emotion regulation from neuropsychology. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 69–86). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BlumenthalJ. A. (2004). Law and the emotions: The problems of affective forecasting. Indiana Law Journal, 80, 155–238.
9.
BrennanW. J. (1988). Reason, passion, and “the progress of the law.”Cardozo Law Review, 10, 3–23.
10.
BrownT. (2011). The affective blindness of evidence law. Denver University Law Review, 89, 47–131.
11.
BushmanB. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 724–731.
12.
ChambersR.GulloneE.AllenN. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 560–572.
13.
Commonwealth v. White, 910 A.2d 658 (Pa. 2006).
14.
Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012 (1988).
15.
DunnB. D.BillottiD.MurphyV.DalgleishT. (2009). The consequences of effortful emotion regulation when processing distressing material: A comparison of suppression and acceptance. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 47, 761–773.
16.
EisenbergN.HoferC.VaughanJ. (2007). Effortful control and its socioemotional consequences. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 287–306). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
GranekL. (2012, May27). When doctors grieve. New York Times, p. SR12.
18.
GrewalD.DavidsonH. A. (2008). Emotional intelligence and graduate medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1200–1202.
19.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.
20.
GrossJ. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
GrossJ. J. (Ed.). (in press). Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2007). Individual differences in emotion regulation. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 351–372). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
GrossJ. J.LevensonR. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970–986.
24.
GrossJ. J.ThompsonR. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
HasnasJ. J. (2009, May29). The unseen deserve empathy too. Wall Street Journal, A15.
HayesJ. P.MoreyR. A.PettyC. M.SethS.SmoskiM. J.McCarthyG.LaBarK. S. (2011). Staying cool when things get hot: Emotion regulation modulates neural mechanisms of memory encoding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–10.
28.
HendersonL. N. (1987). Legality and empathy. Michigan Law Review, 85, 1574–1653.
29.
HessU.KirouacG. (2000). Emotion expression in groups. In LewisM.Haviland-HonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 368–381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
HobbesT. (1904). Leviathan (WallerA. R., Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1651)
31.
HochschildA. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
HuangP. H. (2000). Reasons within passions: Emotions and intentions in property rights bargaining. Oregon Law Review, 79, 435–477.
33.
In re Sloop, 946 So.2d 1046 (S. Ct. Fla. 2007) (per curiam).
34.
KahanD. M.NussbaumM. C. (1996). Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 96, 269–374.
35.
KeltnerD.HorbergE. J.OveisC. (2006). Emotions as moral intuitions. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social thinking and behavior (pp. 161–175). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
36.
KemperT. D. (2000). Social models in the explanation of emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-HonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 45–58). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
KleinD. (2010). Introduction. In KleinD.MitchellG. (Eds.), The psychology of judicial decision making (pp. xi–xv). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
KooleS. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 4–41.
39.
KozinskiA. (1997). Teetering on the high wire. University of Colorado Law Review, 68, 1217–1229.
40.
Liteky v. U.S., 510 U.S. 540 (1994).
41.
MaroneyT. A. (2006). Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 119–142.
42.
MaroneyT. A. (2011a). The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. California Law Review, 99, 629–681.
43.
MaroneyT. A. (2011b). Emotional regulation and judicial behavior. California Law Review, 99, 1481–1552.
44.
MaroneyT. A. (2012). Angry judges. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65, 1207–1286.
45.
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990).
46.
NivenK.TotterdellP.HolmanD. (2009). A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion, 9, 498–509.
47.
NussbaumM. C. (1996). Emotion in the language of judging. St. John’s Law Review, 70, 23–26.
48.
NussbaumM. C. (2004). Hiding from humanity: Disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
O’BrienG. C. (2004). Confessions of an angry judge. Judicature, 87, 251–253.
50.
OgloffJ. R. P. (2002). Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) of the 20th century. In OgloffJ. R. P. (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century (pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
51.
People v. Carter, No. C053369, 2009 WL 626113 (Cal. App. 3 Dist. Mar. 12, 2009).
52.
PosnerR. A. (2001). Frontiers of legal theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
PosnerR. A. (2006). The role of the judge in the twenty-first century. Boston University Law Review, 86, 1049–1068.
54.
PosnerR. A. (2008). How judges think. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
PotegalM.NovacoR. W. (2010). A brief history of anger. In PotegalM.StemmlerG.SpielbergerC. (Eds.), International handbook of anger (pp. 9–24). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
56.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410–424.
57.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J. (2006). Personality and emotional memory: How regulating emotion impairs memory for emotional events. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 631–651.
58.
RiméB. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
SatterfieldJ. M.HughesE. (2007). Emotional skills training for medical students: A systematic review. Medical Education, 41, 935–941.
60.
SchusterM. L.PropenA. (2010). Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements. Law, Culture & Humanities, 6, 75–104.
61.
SheppesG.MeiranN. (2008). Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion, 8, 870–874.
62.
SmithA. C.KleinmanS. (1989). Managing emotions in medical school: Students’ contact with the living and the dead. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 56–69.
63.
SolomonR. C. (2000). Philosophy of emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
SteinbergR. J.FigartD. M. (1999). Emotional labor since the managed heart. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561, 8–26.
67.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114–137). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68.
US v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 93–94 (1944) (Jackson, J., dissenting).
69.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling:A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775–808.
70.
WegnerD. M. (2009). How to think, say, or do precisely the worst thing for any occasion. Science, 325, 48–50.
71.
WranikT.BarrettL. F.SaloveyP. (2007). Intelligent emotion regulation: Is knowledge power? In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 393–407). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
72.
WrightsmanL. S. (1999). Judicial decision making: Is psychology relevant?New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
73.
YoungL.BecharaA.TranelD.DamasioH.HauserM.DamasioA. (2010). Damage to ventromedial prefontal cortex impairs judgment of harmful intent. Neuron, 65, 845–851.
