Appraisal and constructivist theories of emotion both emphasize that emotions are not modular phenomena, but are constructed from more basic psychological parts. In the scientific debate, differences between the two approaches are sometimes overplayed, by classifying appraisal theories as “natural kinds” models, and sometimes underplayed, by basically merging them into constructivist accounts. The aim of this contribution is to illustrate some similarities and some differences between contemporary appraisal and constructivist approaches, and to highlight the fact that appraisal theory has indeed already confronted the idea of construction in the elicitation of emotion. In doing so, I want to argue that, while there is a distinction between appraisal and constructivist camps, it is not as stark as one might think, even though the names of the “ingredients” of emotions may differ.
ArnoldM. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
2.
BarrettL. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28–58.
3.
BroschT.PourtoisG.SanderD.VuilleumierP. (2011). Additive effects of emotional, endogenous, and exogenous attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1779–1787.
4.
BroschT.SanderD. (2013). The appraising brain: Towards a neuro-cognitive model of appraisal processes in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 163–168.
5.
CloreG.OrtonyA. (2013). Psychological construction in the OCC model of emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 335–343.
6.
CritchleyH. D.TangJ.GlaserD.ButterworthB.DolanR. J. (2005). Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response. NeuroImage, 27, 885–895.
7.
CunninghamW. A.BroschT. (2012). Motivational salience: Amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 54–59.
8.
CunninghamW. A.DunfieldK. A.StillmanP. (2013). Emotional states from affective dynamics. Emotion Review, 5, 344–355.
9.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP. D.PackerD. J.van BavelJ. J. (2007). The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Social Cognition, 25, 736–760.
10.
EkmanP. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 169–200.
11.
EllsworthP.SchererK. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In DavidsonR. J.GoldsmithH. H.SchererK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GendronM.BarrettL. F. (2009). Reconstructing the past: A century of ideas about emotion in psychology. Emotion Review, 1, 316–339.
14.
GrandjeanD.SchererK. R. (2008). Unpacking the cognitive architecture of emotion processes. Emotion, 8, 341–351.
15.
GrossJ. J.BarrettL. F. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation: One or two depends on your point of view. Emotion Review, 3, 8–16.
16.
JamesW. (1884). What is an emotion?Mind, 9, 188–205.
17.
LeventhalH.SchererK. R. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition & Emotion, 1, 3–28.
18.
LindquistK. (2013). Emotions emerge from more basic psychological ingredients: A modern psychological constructionist model. Emotion Review, 5, 356–368.
19.
LindquistK.WagerT. D.KoberH.Bliss-MoreauE.BarrettL. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 121–143.
20.
MacDonaldA. W.IIICohenJ. D.StengerV. A.CarterC. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.
21.
MarrD. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
22.
MoorsA. (2007). Can cognitive methods be used to study the unique aspect of emotion: An appraisal theorist’s answer. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1238–1269.
23.
MoorsA. (2010). Automatic constructive appraisal as a candidate cause of emotion. Emotion Review, 2, 139–156.
24.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
25.
OrtonyA.CloreG. L.CollinsA. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
RosemanI. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 161–200.
28.
RosemanI. J.SmithC. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
RussellJ. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
30.
SanderD.GrafmanJ.ZallaT. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14, 303–316.
31.
SanderD.GrandjeanD.SchererK. R. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 18, 317–352.
32.
SchererK. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
SchererK. R.EllsworthP. (2009). Appraisal theories. In SanderD.SchererK. R. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 45–49). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
SpuntR. P.LiebermanM. D.CohenJ. R.EisenbergerN. I. (2012). The phenomenology of error processing: The dorsal ACC response to stop-signal errors tracks reports of negative affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1753–1765.
35.
TomkinsS. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, and consciousness. New York, NY: Springer.
36.
VytalK.HamannS. (2010). Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions: A voxel-based meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2864–2885.
37.
WrightP.HeG.ShapiraN. A.GoodmanW. K.LiuY. (2004). Disgust and the insula: fMRI responses to pictures of mutilation and contamination. Neuroreport, 15, 2347–2351.
