The comments by Brosch and Sander, de Sousa, Frijda, Kuppens, and Parkinson admirably complement the four main articles, adding layers of complexity, but perhaps at the expense of theoretical parsimony and stringency. Their suggestions are inspiring and heuristic, but we must not forget that science is about testing concrete predictions.
BroschT.SanderD. (2013). Comment: The appraising brain: Toward a neuro-cognitive model of appraisal processes in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 163–168.
2.
de SousaR. (2013). Comment: Language and dimensionality in appraisal theory. Emotion Review, 5, 171–175.
3.
EllsworthP. C. (1995). Levels of thought and levels of emotion. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 192–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
EllsworthP. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5, 125–131.
5.
EllsworthP. C.SchererK. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In DavidsonR.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FrijdaN. H. (2013). Comment: The why, when, and how of appraisal. Emotion Review, 5, 169–170.
8.
KuppensP. (2013). Comment: Appraisal affords flexibility to emotion in more ways than one. Emotion Review, 5, 176–179.
9.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
10.
MulliganK.SchererK. R. (2012). Toward a working definition of emotion. Emotion Review, 4, 345–357.
11.
ParkinsonB. (2013). Comment: Journeys to the center of emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 180–184.
12.
SchererK. R. (2012). Neuroscience findings are consistent with appraisal theories of emotion. But does the brain “respect” constructionism?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 163–164.
13.
SchererK. R. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review, 5, 150–162.
14.
SchererK. R.CoutinhoE. (in press). How music creates emotion: A multifactorial process approach. In CochraneT.FantiniB.SchererK. R. (Eds.), The emotional power of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
SchererK. R.ZentnerK. R. (2001). Emotional effects of music: Production rules. In JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 361–392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
