Appraisal theories have described elaborate mechanisms underlying the elicitation of emotion at the psychological-cognitive level, but typically do not integrate neuroscientific concepts and findings. At the same time, theoretical developments in appraisal theory have been pretty much ignored by researchers studying the neuroscience of emotion. We feel that a stronger integration of these two literatures would be highly profitable for both sides. Here we outline a blueprint of the “appraising brain.” To this end, we review neuroimaging research investigating the processing of major appraisal variables, and sketch a neuro-cognitive process model of appraisal with a special emphasis on the chronometry and the recursive aspect of emotional evaluation. We hope that this contribution will stimulate more hypothesis-driven research on the neuroscience of appraisal.
AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.MasterS. L.YeeC. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247.
2.
BlackfordJ. U.BuckholtzJ. W.AveryS. N.ZaldD. H. (2010). A unique role for the human amygdala in novelty detection. Neuroimage, 50, 1188–1193.
3.
BotvinickM. M.CohenJ. D.CarterC. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.
4.
BroschT.CoppinG.SchererK. R.SchwartzS.SanderD. (2011). Generating value(s): Psychological value hierarchies reflect context-dependent sensitivity of the reward system. Social Neuroscience, 6, 198–208.
5.
BroschT.CoppinG.SchwartzS.SanderD. (2012). The importance of actions and the worth of an object: Dissociable neural systems representing core value and economic value. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 497–505.
6.
BroschT.PourtoisG.SanderD. (2010). The perception and categorization of emotional stimuli: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 377–400.
7.
BroschT.PourtoisG.SanderD.VuilleumierP. (2011). Additive effects of emotional, endogenous, and exogenous attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1779–1787.
8.
BroschT.van BavelJ. J. (2012). The flexibility of emotional attention: Accessible social identities guide rapid attentional orienting. Cognition, 125, 309–316.
9.
BroschT.WieserM. J. (2011). The (non)automaticity of amygdala responses to threat: On the issue of fast signals and slow measures. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 14451–14452.
10.
BrownM. W.BashirZ. I. (2002). Evidence concerning how neurons of the perirhinal cortex may effect familiarity discrimination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 357, 1083–1095.
11.
CraigA. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 59–70.
12.
CunninghamW. A.BroschT. (2012). Motivational salience: Amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 54–59.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP. D. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 97–104.
15.
EllsworthP. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5, 125–131.
16.
FrijdaN. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
GrandjeanD.SchererK. R. (2008). Unpacking the cognitive architecture of emotion processes. Emotion, 8, 341–351.
18.
KnochD.Pascual-LeoneA.MeyerK.TreyerV.FehrE. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832.
19.
KumaranD.MaguireE. A. (2007). Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection?Hippocampus, 17, 735–748.
20.
LaBarK. S.GitelmanD. R.ParrishT. B.KimY. H.NobreA. C.MesulamM. M. (2001). Hunger selectively modulates corticolimbic activation to food stimuli in humans. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 493–500.
21.
LindquistK. A.WagerT. D.KoberH.Bliss-MoreauE.BarrettL. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 121–143.
22.
MoorsA. (2013). On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 132–140.
23.
MoorsA.EllsworthP.SchererK. R.FrijdaN. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124.
24.
OlofssonJ. K.NordinS.SequeiraH.PolichJ. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77, 247–265.
25.
OyaH.KawasakiH.HowardM. A.IIIAdolphsR. (2002). Electrophysiological responses in the human amygdala discriminate emotion categories of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9502–9512.
26.
PessoaL. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148–158.
27.
PessoaL.AdolphsR. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773–783.
28.
PourtoisG.SpinelliL.SeeckM.VuilleumierP. (2010). Temporal precedence of emotion over attention modulations in the lateral amygdala: Intracranial ERP evidence from a patient with temporal lobe epilepsy. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 83–93.
29.
RanganathC.RainerG. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 193–202.
30.
RosemanI. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5, 141–149.
31.
RoyM.ShohamyD.WagerT. D. (2012). Ventromedial prefrontal-subcortical systems and the generation of affective meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 147–156.
32.
SanderD. (2009). The amygdala. In SanderD.SchererK. R. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 28–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
SanderD. (in press). Models of emotion: The affective neuroscience approach. In ArmonyJ. L.VuilleumierP. (Eds.), Handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
SanderD.GrafmanJ.ZallaT. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14, 303–316.
35.
SanderD.GrandjeanD.KaiserS.WehrleT.SchererK. R. (2007). Interaction effects of perceived gaze direction and dynamic facial expression: Evidence for appraisal theories of emotion. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 470–480.
36.
SanderD.GrandjeanD.SchererK. R. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 18, 317–352.
37.
SchererK. R. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review, 5, 150–162.
38.
SchererK. R.BroschT. (2009). Culture-specific appraisal biases contribute to emotion dispositions. European Journal of Personality, 23, 265–288.
39.
SchwartzC. E.WrightC. I.ShinL. M.KaganJ.WhalenP. J.McMullinK. G.RauchS. L (2003). Differential amygdalar response to novelversus newly familiar neutral faces: A functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 854–862.
40.
SeidelE. M.EickhoffS. B.KellermannT.SchneiderF.GurR. C.HabelU.DerntlB. (2010). Who is to blame? Neural correlates of causal attribution in social situations. Social Neuroscience, 5, 335–350.
41.
SperdutiM.DelaveauP.FossatiP.NadelJ. (2011). Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: A brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216, 151–157.
42.
TricomiE.FiezJ. A. (2008). Feedback signals in the caudate reflect goal achievement on a declarative memory task. Neuroimage, 41, 1154–1167.
43.
van OverwalleF. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 829–858.
44.
van VeenV.CarterC. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593–602.
45.
ZahnR.MollJ.KruegerF.HueyE. D.GarridoG.GrafmanJ. (2007). Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 6430–6435.
