It is argued that Mason and Capitanio (2012) are not clear on what would count as a “basic emotion,” and their reconstruction appears more geared toward emotionality in general. Their notion that species-typical outcome is the criterion of basicness requires making speculative assumptions about what is expected and average. Suggestions about an epigenetic approach to social construction of emotionality are also offered.
AverillJ. R.NunleyE. P. (1988). Grief as an emotion and as a disease: A social-constructionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 79–95.
2.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.
3.
HartmannH. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adpatation. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
4.
MasonW. A.CapitanioJ. P. (2012). Basic emotions: A reconstruction. Emotion Review, 4, 238–244.
5.
OatleyK.KeltnerD.JenkinsJ. M. (2006). Understanding emotions (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
RichardsonR. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
RussellJ. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.14510.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145
8.
ScarrS. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1–19.
9.
ScarrS. (1993). Biological and cultural diversity: The legacy of Darwin for development. Child Development, 64, 1333–1353.
10.
ZacharP.KendlerK. S. (2010). Philosophical issues in the classification of psychopathology. In MillonT.KruegerR. F.SimonsenE. (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology (pp. 126–148). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
