The very impressive findings on empathy in relation to self-recognition are interpreted in a theoretical framework within which the central concept of synchronous identification, the consequence of compassion, and the relation between maturation and socialization appear to be debatable.
BarrettL. F.BarM. (2009). See it with feeling: Affective predictions during object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1325–1334.
2.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bischof-KöhlerD. (2012). Empathy and self-recognition in phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspective. Emotion Review, 4, 40–48.
4.
CromwellH. C. (2011). Rat pup social motivation: A critical component of early psychological development. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1284–1290.
5.
DamasioA. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotions in the making of consciousness. London, UK: Vintage.
DecetyJ.MeyerM. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 1053–1080.
8.
de WaalF. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.
9.
MeaneyM. J.SzyfM. (2005). Maternal care as a model for experience dependent chromatin plasticity?Trends in Neurosciences, 28, 456–463.
10.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
SingerT.LammC. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.
12.
Wilson-MendenhallC.BarrettL. F.SimmonsW. K.BarsalouL. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization [Supplemental material]. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127.
