A proscriptive moral orientation, involving a focus on “should nots,” is used to resolve a contradiction in the moral socialization literature made evident by findings related to shame. The traditionally accepted view that underregulation of morality (i.e., absence of internalized moral standards) accounts for increased moral transgressions by children of highly restrictive parents is reconceptualized as a problem of overregulation of proscriptive morality, reflected in the internalized focus on prohibitions. Implications of a strong proscriptive orientation for hypocritical punitive responses towards others and for the ironic role of sin emphasized in some religions are briefly discussed.
Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D.M. ( 1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
2.
Campbell, S.B. ( 1995). Behavior problems in preschool children: A review of recent research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 36, 113-149.
3.
Grusec, J.E., & Goodnow, J.J. ( 1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view . Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.
4.
Hoglund, C.L., & Nicholas, K.B. (1995). Shame, guilt, and anger in college students exposed to abusive family environments. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 141-157.
5.
Janoff-Bulman, R. ( 2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120-128.
6.
Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. ( 2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 521-537.
7.
Lepper, M. ( 1983). Social control processes, attributions of motivation, and the internalization of social values. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 294-330). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Liberman, N., & Forster, J. ( 2000). Expression after suppression: A motivational explanation of postsuppressional rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 190-203.
9.
Lutwak, N., & Ferrari, J.R. ( 1997). Understanding shame in adults: Retrospective perceptions of parental-bonding during childhood. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185, 595-598.
10.
Muraven, M., Tice, D.M., & Baumeister, R.F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774-489.
11.
Newman, J.P., Wolff, W.T., & Hearst, E. ( 1980). The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 630-650.
12.
Paulussen-Hoogeboom, M., Stams, G.J.J.M., Hermanns, J.M.A., & Peetsma, T.T.D. (2007). Child negative emotionality and parenting from infancy to preschool: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 43, 438-453.
13.
Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010a). The "shoulds" and "should nots" of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 213-224.
14.
Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010b). Tracing the self-regulatory bases of moral emotions. Emotion Review, 2, 386-396.
15.
Tangney, J.P., Miller, R.S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D.H. ( 1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
16.
Wegner, D.M. ( 1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. New York, NY: Viking/Penguin.
