Tracy, Shariff, and Cheng (2010) present a timely and eloquent review of the current research on the emotion pride in terms of a naturalist framework. The present commentary not only echoes arguments relating to pride’s adaptive function, but also highlights some points of theoretical clarification. Specifically, we question the necessity of the naturalist approach and the emphasis on two facets of pride.
Barrett, L.F., Lindquist, K.A., Bliss-Moreau, E., Gendron, M., Brennan, L., Mize, J., et al. (2007). Of mice and men: Natural kinds of emotions in the mammalian brain? A response to Panksepp and Izard. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 297-311.
2.
Barrett, L.F., Lindquist, K.A., & Gendron, M. ( 2007). Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 327-332.
3.
Izard, C.E. ( 2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260-280.
4.
Panksepp, J. ( 2007). Neurologizing the psychology of affects: How appraisal-based constructivism and basic emotion theory can coexist. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 281-295.
5.
Tracy, J., Shariff, A., & Cheng, J. ( 2010). A naturalist’s view of pride. Emotion Review, 2(2), 163-177.
6.
Williams, L.A., & DeSteno, D. ( 2008). Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1,007-1,017.
7.
Williams, L.A., & DeSteno, D. ( 2009). Pride: Adaptive social emotion or seventh sin?Psychological Science, 20(3), 284-288.
