Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy is notoriously difficult and lacking high quality evidence. Three studies (DiPEP, ARTEMIS and CT-PE-Pregnancy) evaluating a systematic approach to PE diagnosis have recently been published.
DiPEP is a retrospective case-control study that found a poor utility of clinical decision rules or D-dimer testing for PE diagnosis in pregnancy. ARTEMIS and CT-PE-Pregnancy are well conducted prospective management studies that proposed two algorithms with different clinical decision rules and D-dimer criteria for the diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. They included few events in high risk patients, which makes difficult the assessment of both algorithm's safety in women with a high probability of PE.
Considering this new evidence, D-dimer testing might be useful to avoid radiation imaging in pregnant women considered at low risk for PE. In contrast, a negative D-dimer cannot be considered sufficiently safe to rule out PE when clinicians estimate that PE is the most likely diagnosis.
McLeanKCushmanM.Venous thromboembolism and stroke in pregnancy. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog2016;
2016: 243–250.
2.
KamelHNaviBBSriramN, et al.
Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med2014;
370: 1307–1315.
3.
Knight MBK, Tuffnell D, Jayakody H, et al. (eds) On behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care – lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2014–16. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, UK, 2018.
4.
CreangaAASyversonCSeedK, et al.
Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011–2013. Obstet Gynecol2017;
130: 366–373.
5.
SchutteJMSteegersEASchuitemakerNW, et al.
Rise in maternal mortality in the Netherlands. BJOG2010;
117: 399–406.
6.
Van der PolLMMairuhuATTromeurC, et al.
Use of clinical prediction rules and D-dimer tests in the diagnostic management of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Blood Rev2017;
31: 31–36.
7.
MurphyNBroadhurstDIKhashanAS, et al.
Gestation-specific D-dimer reference ranges: a cross-sectional study. BJOG2015;
122: 395–400.
8.
Pinheiro MdeBJunqueiraDRCoelhoFF, et al.
D-dimer in preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta2012;
414: 166–170.
9.
KlineJAWilliamsGWHernandez-NinoJ.D-dimer concentrations in normal pregnancy: new diagnostic thresholds are needed. Clin Chem2005;
51: 825–829.
10.
ChanWSLeeASpencerFA, et al.
D-dimer testing in pregnant patients: towards determining the next 'level' in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost2010;
8: 1004–1011.
11.
HassaninIMShahinAYBadawyMS, et al.
D-dimer testing versus multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of postpartum pulmonary embolism in symptomatic high-risk women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2011;
115: 200–201.
12.
DamodaramMKaladindiMLuckitJ, et al.
D-dimers as a screening test for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: is it of any use?J Obstet Gynaecol2009;
29: 101–103.
13.
RighiniMRobert-EbadiHEliasA, et al.
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a multicenter prospective management outcome study. Ann Intern Med2018;
169: 766–773.
14.
LeungANBullTMJaeschkeR, et al.
An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2011;
184: 1200–1208.
15.
ChanW-SReyEKentNE, et al.
Venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada2014;
36: 527–553.
16.
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Thromboembolic Disease in Pregnancy and the Puerperium; Acute Management (Green-top Guideline No. 37b), 2015.
17.
KlineJARichardsonDMThanMP, et al.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnant patients investigated for suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med2014;
21: 949–959.
18.
O'ConnorCMoriartyJWalshJ, et al.
The application of a clinical risk stratification score may reduce unnecessary investigations for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2011;
24: 1461–1464.
19.
AndersonDRKahnSRRodgerMA, et al.
Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA2007;
298: 2743–2753.
20.
van EsNvan der HulleTvan EsJ, et al.
Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med2016;
165: 253–261.
21.
van der HulleTCheungWYKooijS, et al.
Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. The Lancet2017;
390: 289–297.
22.
RoyPMMeyerGVielleB, et al.
Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med2006;
144: 157–164.
23.
HuntBJParmarKHorspoolK, et al.
The DiPEP (Diagnosis of PE in Pregnancy) biomarker study: an observational cohort study augmented with additional cases to determine the diagnostic utility of biomarkers for suspected venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium. Br J Haematol2018;
180: 694–704.
24.
GleesonFVTurnerSScarsbrookAF.Improving the diagnostic performance of lung scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolic disease. Clin Radiol2006;
61: 1010–1015.
25.
KonstantinidesSVTorbickiAAgnelliG, et al.
2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J2014;
35: 3033–3069, 69a–69k.
26.
LimWLe GalGBatesSM, et al.
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv2018;
2: 3226–3256.
27.
van der PolLMTromeurCBistervelsIM, et al.
Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med2019;
380: 1139–1149.
28.
van EsJBeenenLFDoumaRA, et al.
A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost2015;
13: 1428–1435.
29.
EnsorJRileyRDMooreD, et al.
Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE. BMJ Open2016;
6: e011190.
30.
ToMSHuntBJNelson-PiercyC.A negative D-dimer does not exclude venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol2008;
28: 222–223.
31.
AustinPCSteyerbergEW.Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models. Stat Methods Med Res2017;
26: 796–808.
32.
Committee on Obstetric P.
Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol2017;
130: e210–e6.
33.
LoweS.Diagnostic imaging in pregnancy: making informed decisions.Obstet Med2019;
12: 116–122.
34.
Le GalGRighiniMRoyP-M, et al.
Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the Revised Geneva Score. Ann Intern Med2006;
144: 165.
35.
DronkersCEAvan der HulleTLe GalG, et al.
Towards a tailored diagnostic standard for future diagnostic studies in pulmonary embolism: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost2017;
15: 1040–1043.
36.
MahendruAAEverettTRWilkinsonIB, et al.
A longitudinal study of maternal cardiovascular function from preconception to the postpartum period. J Hypertens2014;
32: 849–856.
37.
TouhamiOMarzoukSBBennasrL, et al.
Are the Wells Score and the Revised Geneva Score valuable for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy?.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2018;
221: 166–171.
38.
PenalozaAVerschurenFMeyerG, et al.
Comparison of the unstructured clinician gestalt, the wells score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med2013;
62: 117–124 e2.
39.
ShenJHChenHLChenJR, et al.
Comparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis2016;
41: 482–492.
40.
LangloisECusson-DufourCMoumnehT, et al.
Could the YEARS algorithm be used to exclude PE during pregnancy? Data from the CT-PE-pregnancy study. J Thromb Haemost2019;
17: 1329–1334.
41.
GoodacreSHuntBJNelson-PiercyC.Diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. N Engl J Med2019;
380: e49.
