To assess the glycaemic profile and glycaemic variation in the second and third trimesters of normal pregnancies.
Methodology
Healthy pregnant women aged 19–35 years between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation were recruited for ambulatory glucose profile monitoring. A total of 18 women in the second trimester, 15 women in the third trimester and 9 healthy non-pregnant women were recruited providing, respectively, 205 days (19,680 data points), 147 days (14,112 data points) and 100 days (9,600 data points) for analysis.
Results
Mean blood glucose level was 20.2% lower in the second trimester and 10.6% lower in the third trimester than non-pregnant women (p < 0.001). In pregnancy, it took 15 to 20 minutes more to reach peak postprandial blood glucose levels compared to non-pregnant women (p = 0.003). Glycaemic variability was more in the third trimester (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
There is tight blood sugar control along with lower mean blood glucose in healthy pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women. Despite this tight glycaemic control, glycaemic variability is higher during pregnancy.
CousinsLRiggLHollingsworthD, et al.
The 24-hour excursion and diurnal rhythm of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol1980;
136: 483–488.
2.
PhelpsRLMetzgerBEFreinkelN.Carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy: diurnal profiles of plasma glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, triglycerides, cholesterol, and individual amino acids in late normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol1981;
140: 730–736.
3.
SeshiahVSahayBKDasAK, et al.
Gestational diabetes mellitus – Indian guidelines. J Indian Med Assoc2009;
107: 799–802.
CarreiroMPLauriaMWNavesGN, et al.
Seventy two-hour glucose monitoring profiles in mild gestational diabetes mellitus: differences from healthy pregnancies and influence of diet counseling. Eur J Endocrinol2016;
175: 201–209.
8.
AlfadhliEOsmanEBasriT.Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as an educational tool for patients with gestational diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr2016;
8: 48.
9.
PolskySGarcettiR.CGM, pregnancy and remote monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther2017;
19: S-49–S-59.
10.
YogevYBen-HaroushAChenR, et al.
Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol2004;
191: 949–953.
11.
MurphyHRRaymanGDuffeieldK, et al.
Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: randomized clinical trial. BMJ2008;
337: a1680
12.
YogevYBen-HaroushAChenR, et al.
Continuous glucose monitoring for treatment adjustment in diabetic pregnancies – a pilot study. Diabet Med2003;
20: 558–562.
13.
SiegmundTRadNTRitterathC, et al.
Longitudinal changes in the continuous glucose profile measured by CGMS in healthy pregnant women and determination of cut off values. EJOG2008;
139: 46–52.
14.
HernandezTLFriedmanJEVan PeltRE, et al.
Pattern of glycaemia in normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged. Diabetes Care2011;
34: 1660–1668.
15.
KerssenAde ValkHWVisserGH.The continuous glucose monitoring system during pregnancy of women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: accuracy assessment. DiabetesTechnol Ther2004;
6: 645–651.
16.
SecherALStageERingholmL, et al.
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring as a tool to prevent severe hypoglycaemia in selected pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes – an observational study. Diabet Med2014;
31: 352–356.
17.
Di CianniGMiccoliRVolpeL, et al.
Intermediate metabolism in normal pregnancy and in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev2003;
19: 259–227.
18.
HaddenDRMcLaughlinC.Normal and abnormal maternal metabolism during pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med2009;
14: 66–71.
19.
Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: A report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes association and the endocrine society. Diab Care 2013; 36: 1384--1395.
20.
NaikDShyamsundefAHMruthyunjayaMD, et al.
Masked hypoglycaemia in pregnancy. J Diabetes2016;
9: 778–786.
21.
CousinLRiggLHollingsworthD, et al.
The 24 hour excursion and diurnal rhythm of glucose, insulin and C peptide in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol1980;
136: 483–488.
22.
LeonceJBrocktonNRobinsonS, et al.
Glucose production in human placenta. Placenta2006;
27: S103–S108.
23.
CunninghamGFLevenoKJBloomSL, et al. Maternal physiology. In: Cunningham GF, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL (eds) William obstetrics. 23rd ed. McGraw Hill, pp.107–135.
24.
DuranASáenzSTorrejónMJ, et al.
Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: the St. Carlos gestational diabetes study. Diabetes Care2014;
37: 2442–2450.
25.
BuhlingKJWinkelTWolfC, et al.
Optimal timing for blood glucose measurement in pregnant women with diabetes and non-diabetic pregnant population evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). J Perinat Med2005;
33: 125–131.
26.
SuhSKimJH.Glycemic variability: how do we measure it and why is it important?Diabetes Metab J2015;
39: 273–282.
27.
MonnierLColetteC.Glycemic variability. Should we and can we prevent it?Diabetes Care2008;
31: S150–S154.
28.
CengizETamborlaneWV.A tale of two compartments: interstitial versus blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther2009;
11: S11–S16.
29.
MurphyHRElleriDAllenJM, et al.
Closed-loop insulin delivery during pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care2011;
34: 406–411.
30.
RodbardD.Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes Technol Ther2016;
18: S3–S13.
