Cabrera GonzalezMPerez LopezLMMartinez SotoGGutierrez de la IglesiaD.Prognostic value of age and Wassel classification in the reconstruction of thumb duplication. J Child Orthop. 2013,
7: 551–7.
2.
DijkmanRRVan NieuwenhovenCAHoviusSER.Letter to the editor regarding “prognostic value of age and Wassel classification in the reconstruction of thumb duplication”. J Child Orthop. 2014,
8: 289–90.
3.
HalversonHM.The development of prehension in infants. In: BarkerRGKouninJSWrightHF (Eds.) Child behavior and development: A course of representative studies.
New York,
McGraw-Hill, 2005: 49–65.
4.
HellevuoCLeppanenOVKapanenSVilkkiSK.Long-term outcomes after pollicization: a mean 11-year follow-up study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2020,
45: 173–80.
5.
HohlsteinRR.The development of prehension in normal infants. Am J Occup Ther. 1982,
36: 170–6.
6.
IacobucciG.Paediatricians condemn “national scandal” of 400 000 children waiting for treatment. BMJ. 2023,
381: 1097.
7.
JiaZWBaiDMLongJT, et al.
Optimal surgical timing and treatment of thumb duplication in children. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013,
29: 336–40.
8.
Lightdale-MiricNMueskeNMLawrenceEL, et al.
Long term functional outcomes after early childhood pollicization. J Hand Ther. 2015,
28: 158–65; quiz 66.
9.
ManskePRRotmanMBDaileyLA.Long-term functional results after pollicization for the congenitally deficient thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1992,
17: 1064–72.